Target CPU run time


Advanced search

Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Target CPU run time

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Tom Philippart
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 May 06
Posts: 183
Credit: 834,667
RAC: 0
Message 70183 - Posted: 30 Apr 2011, 20:14:47 UTC

is it still relevant today?

I remember in 2006/2007 there were some discussions about the optimal time.

What is the project's preferred setting?

My computers run 24/7 so there's no personal preference involved.
ID: 70183 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Chilean
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 05
Posts: 711
Credit: 26,694,507
RAC: 0
Message 70243 - Posted: 4 May 2011, 15:57:36 UTC

I run 2 hours. I find that "IF" a WU fails, the maximum time I would "lose" due to it failing is two hours.
ID: 70243 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Orgil

Send message
Joined: 11 Dec 05
Posts: 82
Credit: 169,751
RAC: 0
Message 70247 - Posted: 5 May 2011, 2:36:28 UTC

As my observation 32nm cpu's run far greater effeciently than any other xeons or top quads of 45nm make. I tried to debate this fact at einstein@home forum but "the big gurus" there furuiosly blindly protecting their old tech against commonly shown fact that can be accessed by anyone at Top User Stats of any dc project website.
ID: 70247 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Target CPU run time



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org