Error report

Message boards : Number crunching : Error report

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Christian Barrett
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 11
Credit: 14,933
RAC: 0
Message 438 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 2:32:08 UTC

9/24/2005 9:26:46 PM|Einstein@Home|Restarting result l1_0992.5__0992.9_0.1_T06_S4lB_0 using einstein version 4.79
9/24/2005 9:26:46 PM|rosetta@home|Pausing result 1pvaA_abrelax_no_cst_1487_0 (removed from memory)
9/24/2005 9:26:48 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result 1pvaA_abrelax_no_cst_1487_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))

FYI

I got this when BOINC switched to einstein. the current run errored out. Running client 4.77
ID: 438 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Nightbird

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 70
Credit: 32,418
RAC: 0
Message 447 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 10:19:40 UTC
Last modified: 25 Sep 2005, 10:20:30 UTC

Leave applications in memory while preempted? yes

that will help


ID: 447 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile KWSN Sir Clark

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 05
Posts: 46
Credit: 387,432
RAC: 0
Message 452 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 10:47:16 UTC

Personally I wouldn't do that if you've got 512MB of RAM cause it'll use the RAM and your computer will slow down.
ID: 452 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Ocean Archer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Sep 05
Posts: 32
Credit: 49,302
RAC: 0
Message 453 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 10:48:33 UTC

If you plan on leaving the program in memory, should you add additional RAM?
ID: 453 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
RDC

Send message
Joined: 16 Sep 05
Posts: 43
Credit: 101,644
RAC: 0
Message 454 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 10:55:15 UTC - in response to Message 452.  

Personally I wouldn't do that if you've got 512MB of RAM cause it'll use the RAM and your computer will slow down.


Huh? I have 512MB of RAM with an old 1200 mhz AMD processor, usually have 4 or 5 BOINC applications in memory (CPDN, Rosetta, SZTAKI, LHC, Seti, Einstein, etc) and I have no slow down of my computer at all even when doing other things on the computer. Some timing issues with how BOINC records the CPU time yes but not any noticible slowdown of the computer itself. That's what swap memory is for, to help prevent the computer from slowing down as it swaps out programs/files residing in RAM to the HD when they aren't being used and brings them back in when they are needed.


ID: 454 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Nightbird

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 70
Credit: 32,418
RAC: 0
Message 455 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 11:15:27 UTC

@All
If somebody has a better idea, i'm sure that C. Barrett will be happy to hear you.
He has also 512 mb of ram.
And if he dooesn't try, he will not know if my idea is the or a solution.


ID: 455 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
J D K
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Sep 05
Posts: 168
Credit: 101,266
RAC: 0
Message 460 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 13:41:35 UTC - in response to Message 438.  

9/24/2005 9:26:46 PM|Einstein@Home|Restarting result l1_0992.5__0992.9_0.1_T06_S4lB_0 using einstein version 4.79
9/24/2005 9:26:46 PM|rosetta@home|Pausing result 1pvaA_abrelax_no_cst_1487_0 (removed from memory)
9/24/2005 9:26:48 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result 1pvaA_abrelax_no_cst_1487_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))

FYI

I got this when BOINC switched to einstein. the current run errored out. Running client 4.77



Look Here
BOINC Wiki

ID: 460 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Christian Barrett
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 11
Credit: 14,933
RAC: 0
Message 466 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 14:40:07 UTC - in response to Message 455.  

@All
If somebody has a better idea, i'm sure that C. Barrett will be happy to hear you.
He has also 512 mb of ram.
And if he dooesn't try, he will not know if my idea is the or a solution.


Ill be honest, this is the first time i had a stop on a switch in my 2 years of crunching so i had "assumed" that the programs were retained in memory on a switch. After reading your suggestion, i checked and lo and behold, it wasnt set up that way. hmmm.

I will switch it and see what happens. thanks!
ID: 466 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Nightbird

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 70
Credit: 32,418
RAC: 0
Message 470 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 15:04:35 UTC - in response to Message 466.  
Last modified: 25 Sep 2005, 15:15:44 UTC

@All
If somebody has a better idea, i'm sure that C. Barrett will be happy to hear you.
He has also 512 mb of ram.
And if he dooesn't try, he will not know if my idea is the or a solution.


Ill be honest, this is the first time i had a stop on a switch in my 2 years of crunching so i had "assumed" that the programs were retained in memory on a switch. After reading your suggestion, i checked and lo and behold, it wasnt set up that way. hmmm.

I will switch it and see what happens. thanks!

A friend got the same error like you (but no problems with the other Boinc projects).
He has also "only" 256 mb of ram and all the wus ran errored.
He tried "Leave applications in memory while preempted? yes" and now, all is ok.

So when i saw your error message, i had the same idea.



ID: 470 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Golden Turtle

Send message
Joined: 23 Sep 05
Posts: 34
Credit: 22,941
RAC: 0
Message 478 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 18:23:12 UTC

Thanks for the tip. Leave application in memory while preempted =YES works for me. Previously there were 4 WUs in succession with the error message, now all seems to work fine.All the errors came at switch from one BOINC project to Rosetta.
ID: 478 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [B@H] Ray
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 05
Posts: 118
Credit: 100,251
RAC: 0
Message 479 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 19:22:14 UTC - in response to Message 452.  

Personally I wouldn't do that if you've got 512MB of RAM cause it'll use the RAM and your computer will slow down.

I only have 512 Megs and often have 3 left on memory with no slowing down. With CPDN you have to do that or you could louse up to 20 munits of processing on it when it switches to another project. But I have to admit that more would be better.

Ray


Pizza@Home Rays Place Rays place Forums
ID: 479 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile KWSN Sir Clark

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 05
Posts: 46
Credit: 387,432
RAC: 0
Message 484 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 19:46:58 UTC

I was only suggesting it because Rosetta was taking up around 200MB of memory, I didn't check the optimised version now out and that's only using 32MB :)
ID: 484 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [B@H] Ray
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 05
Posts: 118
Credit: 100,251
RAC: 0
Message 486 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 20:03:10 UTC - in response to Message 484.  

I was only suggesting it because Rosetta was taking up around 200MB of memory, I didn't check the optimised version now out and that's only using 32MB :)

Whare did you see the optomized versions for this? I thought they were going to be made later.
Ray


Pizza@Home Rays Place Rays place Forums
ID: 486 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Ethan
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 05
Posts: 286
Credit: 9,304,700
RAC: 0
Message 488 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 20:14:23 UTC

The optimized version is 4.76 or 4.77. . all the work units since Thursday or Friday are 'optimized'. . . Which is great for the project, they're doing the same amount of work in 1/5th the time, as well as people not losing credit if they restart the client.
ID: 488 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [B@H] Ray
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 05
Posts: 118
Credit: 100,251
RAC: 0
Message 491 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 20:50:57 UTC - in response to Message 488.  

The optimized version is 4.76 or 4.77. . all the work units since Thursday or Friday are 'optimized'. . . Which is great for the project, they're doing the same amount of work in 1/5th the time, as well as people not losing credit if they restart the client.

I just got my first ones Saturday, glad that I did not have the old App and have to abort all units to get the new Application.
If all are getting 4.77 now is that optomized for SSE, SSE2, MMX or what instruction set? If for MMX a lot of us could still do it faster if for SSE, SSE2 or SSE3 depending on the processor you have.
Ray


Pizza@Home Rays Place Rays place Forums
ID: 491 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile JimB
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 19
Credit: 228,111
RAC: 0
Message 494 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 21:22:57 UTC
Last modified: 25 Sep 2005, 21:27:35 UTC


My results have 5 client error/computing, and 2 client error/done. I get the same error code as Mr. Barrett - just sent in 2 bad wu's. I checked prefs and set Leave in memory to yes (was no). I have CPU with 1GB RAM, plenty of drive space and I'm running with seti and cpdn suspended, doing only rosetta today - 2 wu's at a time, one per thread. Any ideas why I'm getting those errors? I looked at the wiki referenced below, and I suspect I don't have prefs set properly rather than unstable hardware.

/edit...

Also, using 4.77 science app and 4.45 boinc.

Thanks,


"Be all that you can be...considering." Harold Green
ID: 494 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Desti

Send message
Joined: 16 Sep 05
Posts: 50
Credit: 3,018
RAC: 0
Message 495 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 21:25:25 UTC

I got a similar error:


BOINC request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded 2005-09-25 22:57
climateprediction.net Restarting result 0l7y_100047802_0 using hadsm3 version 4.13 2005-09-25 22:57
Einstein@Home Restarting result w1_0405.5__0405.8_0.1_T00_S4hB_1 using einstein version 4.81 2005-09-25 22:57
LHC@home Pausing result wjun3A_v6s4hhnom_mqx__19__64.257_59.2786__10_12__6__80_1_sixvf_boinc23409_7 (removed from memory) 2005-09-25 22:57
rosetta@home Pausing result 1btn__abrelax_05672_0 (removed from memory) 2005-09-25 22:57
BOINC request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 2005-09-25 22:57
rosetta@home Unrecoverable error for result 1btn__abrelax_05672_0 (process exited with code 131 (0x83)) 2005-09-25 22:57
BOINC request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 2005-09-25 22:57
rosetta@home Deferring communication with project for 1 minutes and 0 seconds 2005-09-25 22:57
rosetta@home Computation for result 1btn__abrelax_05672_0 finished 2005-09-25 22:57


LUE
ID: 495 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Desti

Send message
Joined: 16 Sep 05
Posts: 50
Credit: 3,018
RAC: 0
Message 499 - Posted: 25 Sep 2005, 23:32:55 UTC - in response to Message 495.  

I got a similar error:


BOINC request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded 2005-09-25 22:57
climateprediction.net Restarting result 0l7y_100047802_0 using hadsm3 version 4.13 2005-09-25 22:57
Einstein@Home Restarting result w1_0405.5__0405.8_0.1_T00_S4hB_1 using einstein version 4.81 2005-09-25 22:57
LHC@home Pausing result wjun3A_v6s4hhnom_mqx__19__64.257_59.2786__10_12__6__80_1_sixvf_boinc23409_7 (removed from memory) 2005-09-25 22:57
rosetta@home Pausing result 1btn__abrelax_05672_0 (removed from memory) 2005-09-25 22:57
BOINC request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 2005-09-25 22:57
rosetta@home Unrecoverable error for result 1btn__abrelax_05672_0 (process exited with code 131 (0x83)) 2005-09-25 22:57
BOINC request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 2005-09-25 22:57
rosetta@home Deferring communication with project for 1 minutes and 0 seconds 2005-09-25 22:57
rosetta@home Computation for result 1btn__abrelax_05672_0 finished 2005-09-25 22:57



https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=39702

4.72
process exited with code 131 (0x83)


[0x864ff8f]
[0x86c183c]
[0xffffe500]
[0x852f698]
[0x8534e0a]
[0x855ca07]
[0x842c683]
[0x826a091]
[0x826a4e0]
[0x82bf17a]
[0x8363006]
[0x86c6e84]
[0x8048121]
SIGSEGV: segmentation violationStack trace (13 frames):

Exiting...

ID: 499 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mrwizer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 05
Posts: 23
Credit: 507,085
RAC: 0
Message 502 - Posted: 26 Sep 2005, 0:05:12 UTC
Last modified: 26 Sep 2005, 0:06:05 UTC

9/25/2005 4:48:12 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result 1pvaA_abrelax_14956_2 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))

R@H app 4.77
BOINC app 4.45
WinXP Pro
1.8 P4 M
ID: 502 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
J D K
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Sep 05
Posts: 168
Credit: 101,266
RAC: 0
Message 504 - Posted: 26 Sep 2005, 1:18:42 UTC

ID: 504 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Error report



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org