Message boards : Number crunching : Error report
Author | Message |
---|---|
Christian Barrett Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 11 Credit: 14,933 RAC: 0 |
9/24/2005 9:26:46 PM|Einstein@Home|Restarting result l1_0992.5__0992.9_0.1_T06_S4lB_0 using einstein version 4.79 9/24/2005 9:26:46 PM|rosetta@home|Pausing result 1pvaA_abrelax_no_cst_1487_0 (removed from memory) 9/24/2005 9:26:48 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result 1pvaA_abrelax_no_cst_1487_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) FYI I got this when BOINC switched to einstein. the current run errored out. Running client 4.77 |
Nightbird Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 70 Credit: 32,418 RAC: 0 |
Leave applications in memory while preempted? yes that will help |
KWSN Sir Clark Send message Joined: 18 Sep 05 Posts: 46 Credit: 387,432 RAC: 0 |
Personally I wouldn't do that if you've got 512MB of RAM cause it'll use the RAM and your computer will slow down. |
Ocean Archer Send message Joined: 22 Sep 05 Posts: 32 Credit: 49,302 RAC: 0 |
If you plan on leaving the program in memory, should you add additional RAM? |
RDC Send message Joined: 16 Sep 05 Posts: 43 Credit: 101,644 RAC: 0 |
Personally I wouldn't do that if you've got 512MB of RAM cause it'll use the RAM and your computer will slow down. Huh? I have 512MB of RAM with an old 1200 mhz AMD processor, usually have 4 or 5 BOINC applications in memory (CPDN, Rosetta, SZTAKI, LHC, Seti, Einstein, etc) and I have no slow down of my computer at all even when doing other things on the computer. Some timing issues with how BOINC records the CPU time yes but not any noticible slowdown of the computer itself. That's what swap memory is for, to help prevent the computer from slowing down as it swaps out programs/files residing in RAM to the HD when they aren't being used and brings them back in when they are needed. |
Nightbird Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 70 Credit: 32,418 RAC: 0 |
@All If somebody has a better idea, i'm sure that C. Barrett will be happy to hear you. He has also 512 mb of ram. And if he dooesn't try, he will not know if my idea is the or a solution. |
J D K Send message Joined: 23 Sep 05 Posts: 168 Credit: 101,266 RAC: 0 |
9/24/2005 9:26:46 PM|Einstein@Home|Restarting result l1_0992.5__0992.9_0.1_T06_S4lB_0 using einstein version 4.79 Look Here BOINC Wiki |
Christian Barrett Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 11 Credit: 14,933 RAC: 0 |
@All Ill be honest, this is the first time i had a stop on a switch in my 2 years of crunching so i had "assumed" that the programs were retained in memory on a switch. After reading your suggestion, i checked and lo and behold, it wasnt set up that way. hmmm. I will switch it and see what happens. thanks! |
Nightbird Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 70 Credit: 32,418 RAC: 0 |
@All A friend got the same error like you (but no problems with the other Boinc projects). He has also "only" 256 mb of ram and all the wus ran errored. He tried "Leave applications in memory while preempted? yes" and now, all is ok. So when i saw your error message, i had the same idea. |
Golden Turtle Send message Joined: 23 Sep 05 Posts: 34 Credit: 22,941 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for the tip. Leave application in memory while preempted =YES works for me. Previously there were 4 WUs in succession with the error message, now all seems to work fine.All the errors came at switch from one BOINC project to Rosetta. |
[B@H] Ray Send message Joined: 20 Sep 05 Posts: 118 Credit: 100,251 RAC: 0 |
Personally I wouldn't do that if you've got 512MB of RAM cause it'll use the RAM and your computer will slow down. I only have 512 Megs and often have 3 left on memory with no slowing down. With CPDN you have to do that or you could louse up to 20 munits of processing on it when it switches to another project. But I have to admit that more would be better. Ray Pizza@Home Rays Place Rays place Forums |
KWSN Sir Clark Send message Joined: 18 Sep 05 Posts: 46 Credit: 387,432 RAC: 0 |
I was only suggesting it because Rosetta was taking up around 200MB of memory, I didn't check the optimised version now out and that's only using 32MB :) |
[B@H] Ray Send message Joined: 20 Sep 05 Posts: 118 Credit: 100,251 RAC: 0 |
I was only suggesting it because Rosetta was taking up around 200MB of memory, I didn't check the optimised version now out and that's only using 32MB :) Whare did you see the optomized versions for this? I thought they were going to be made later. Ray Pizza@Home Rays Place Rays place Forums |
Ethan Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 05 Posts: 286 Credit: 9,304,700 RAC: 0 |
The optimized version is 4.76 or 4.77. . all the work units since Thursday or Friday are 'optimized'. . . Which is great for the project, they're doing the same amount of work in 1/5th the time, as well as people not losing credit if they restart the client. |
[B@H] Ray Send message Joined: 20 Sep 05 Posts: 118 Credit: 100,251 RAC: 0 |
The optimized version is 4.76 or 4.77. . all the work units since Thursday or Friday are 'optimized'. . . Which is great for the project, they're doing the same amount of work in 1/5th the time, as well as people not losing credit if they restart the client. I just got my first ones Saturday, glad that I did not have the old App and have to abort all units to get the new Application. If all are getting 4.77 now is that optomized for SSE, SSE2, MMX or what instruction set? If for MMX a lot of us could still do it faster if for SSE, SSE2 or SSE3 depending on the processor you have. Ray Pizza@Home Rays Place Rays place Forums |
JimB Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 19 Credit: 228,111 RAC: 0 |
My results have 5 client error/computing, and 2 client error/done. I get the same error code as Mr. Barrett - just sent in 2 bad wu's. I checked prefs and set Leave in memory to yes (was no). I have CPU with 1GB RAM, plenty of drive space and I'm running with seti and cpdn suspended, doing only rosetta today - 2 wu's at a time, one per thread. Any ideas why I'm getting those errors? I looked at the wiki referenced below, and I suspect I don't have prefs set properly rather than unstable hardware. /edit... Also, using 4.77 science app and 4.45 boinc. Thanks, "Be all that you can be...considering." Harold Green |
Desti Send message Joined: 16 Sep 05 Posts: 50 Credit: 3,018 RAC: 0 |
I got a similar error: BOINC request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded 2005-09-25 22:57 climateprediction.net Restarting result 0l7y_100047802_0 using hadsm3 version 4.13 2005-09-25 22:57 Einstein@Home Restarting result w1_0405.5__0405.8_0.1_T00_S4hB_1 using einstein version 4.81 2005-09-25 22:57 LHC@home Pausing result wjun3A_v6s4hhnom_mqx__19__64.257_59.2786__10_12__6__80_1_sixvf_boinc23409_7 (removed from memory) 2005-09-25 22:57 rosetta@home Pausing result 1btn__abrelax_05672_0 (removed from memory) 2005-09-25 22:57 BOINC request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 2005-09-25 22:57 rosetta@home Unrecoverable error for result 1btn__abrelax_05672_0 (process exited with code 131 (0x83)) 2005-09-25 22:57 BOINC request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 2005-09-25 22:57 rosetta@home Deferring communication with project for 1 minutes and 0 seconds 2005-09-25 22:57 rosetta@home Computation for result 1btn__abrelax_05672_0 finished 2005-09-25 22:57 LUE |
Desti Send message Joined: 16 Sep 05 Posts: 50 Credit: 3,018 RAC: 0 |
I got a similar error: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=39702 4.72 process exited with code 131 (0x83) [0x864ff8f] [0x86c183c] [0xffffe500] [0x852f698] [0x8534e0a] [0x855ca07] [0x842c683] [0x826a091] [0x826a4e0] [0x82bf17a] [0x8363006] [0x86c6e84] [0x8048121] SIGSEGV: segmentation violationStack trace (13 frames): Exiting... |
mrwizer Send message Joined: 18 Sep 05 Posts: 23 Credit: 507,085 RAC: 0 |
9/25/2005 4:48:12 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result 1pvaA_abrelax_14956_2 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) R@H app 4.77 BOINC app 4.45 WinXP Pro 1.8 P4 M |
J D K Send message Joined: 23 Sep 05 Posts: 168 Credit: 101,266 RAC: 0 |
|
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Error report
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org