I have two separate machines in two locations that have multiple results that all have the same uploading error message (Project file upload handler is missing). I tried rebooting each machine with no difference. Both are running Linux Redhat 13.

You should check the main project page where they mention a major SAN storage problem has occurred again. Must be some pretty old junk to have the issues they've had. Heck I have a first gen SAN still chugging along here. (amongst others) Though not nearly the kind of disk activity they probably see.


Give it a week or three and things should be back to normal.

I have the same errorr on all my completed work units "Project file upload handler is missing". What should I do?

Hmmm.....strange.......
From eight jobs, five uploaded normaly, but 3 won't upload.

12-1-2011 20:22:46 rosetta@home Started upload of patrick_test_01_rlbn_1fkb_IGNORE_THE_REST_NATIVE_22848_37_0_0
12-1-2011 20:22:47 rosetta@home Project file upload handler is missing
12-1-2011 20:22:47 rosetta@home Backing off 1 hr 1 min 31 sec on upload of patrick_test_01_rlbn_1fkb_IGNORE_THE_REST_NATIVE_22848_37_0_0

They're all 'patrick_test' jobs!
Maybe that's the thruth meaning of 'ignore the rest'?

Should I delete the stuff?

---

Should I delete the stuff?

No.

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

Should I delete the stuff?

No.

And that's all you've got to say in response to all the faults and complaints? What a joke of an admin this project has. I've got better things to donate my PC time to than this crap.

Bye Bye Rosetta.

---

EvoDude, I am a volunteer moderator, nothing more. I don't have any additional information to offer on the servers or plans or problems, nor do I have any access to post messages on the project homepage nor access to it's servers. So please, don't leave on my account. The "Project Administrator" title posted next to my profile name is due to the standard BOINC server code, and is not an indication of any duties.

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

EvoDude, I am a volunteer moderator, nothing more. I don't have any additional information to offer on the servers or plans or problems, nor do I have any access to post messages on the project homepage nor access to it's servers. So please, don't leave on my account. The "Project Administrator" title posted next to my profile name is due to the standard BOINC server code, and is not an indication of any duties.

Don't beat yourself up. EvoDude's 0 RAC leads me to discover he hasn't run a single task here since 2007 anyway... Makes you wonder... or not...

---

EvoDude, I am a volunteer moderator, nothing more. I don't have any additional information to offer on the servers or plans or problems, nor do I have any access to post messages on the project homepage nor access to it's servers. So please, don't leave on my account. The "Project Administrator" title posted next to my profile name is due to the standard BOINC server code, and is not an indication of any duties.

Don't beat yourself up. EvoDude's 0 RAC leads me to discover he hasn't run a single task here since 2007 anyway... Makes you wonder... or not...

So, because I've been busy doing other work, particularly at Rosetta's test project where I'm 14th in the world and highest, by a country mile, in the UK means I can't have an opinion on the handling of the volunteers in this part of the project? Get real mate and check your facts properly before you cast aspersions. I PM'd the Mod in question as soon as he responded to discuss this privately, again something you wouldn't know, but let's not let actual fact get in the way of you having a personal dig at me.

My suggestion:- Keep your nose out of my business till you know what you are talking about.

---

Should I delete the stuff?

No.

Oke
There's still a week to go before they expire.
But nnw for now before it clutters my pc!

---

Whatever opinion you want to express, EvoDude, your "bye bye Rosetta" was both impotent and petulant, irrespective of what you've done on Ralph. However limited the front page info it's been apparent the failure was extensive and mod.sense's reply seems as complete and accurate now as it did at the time. As was mine.

---

Whatever opinion you want to express, EvoDude, your "bye bye Rosetta" was both impotent and petulant, irrespective of what you've done on Ralph. However limited the front page info it's been apparent the failure was extensive and mod.sense's reply seems as complete and accurate now as it did at the time. As was mine.

Aye aye - whatever. Why you needed to get personal about it I don't know but my post had nothing to do with you and maybe if you spent more time addressing the failings in your own site it would have less dead/broken links and people on here would be allowed to have freedom of expression and state their opinion without fear of unwarranted personal abuse.

Subject closed as far as I'm concerned but no doubt you will want to carry on your own wee petulant, impotent rant. Doesn't make you right, you know.

---

Tasks starting with casd_ seem to be failing after 30 seconds of runtime, and then reporting with validation errors as per reports here. They all seem to show 100 starting structures and 100 decoys... and 1200 CPU seconds in the output, but around 40 in the task's reported CPU time.

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

I caught several tasks ending too early which mentioned in Dec - now on my own computer. Dependence(what may cause this) is not found - all looks as normal for me.
The CPU target time was 2 hours and did not change.
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=403175973
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=403175972
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=403005728

P.S.
In general, I like the version 2.17. Over the last >2 months no serious crashes or memory leaks at all.

I caught several tasks ending too early which mentioned in Dec - now on my own computer. Dependence(what may cause this) is not found - all looks as normal for me.
The CPU target time was 2 hours and did not change.
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=403175973
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=403175972
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=403005728

P.S.
In general, I like the version 2.17. Over the last >2 months no serious crashes or memory leaks at all.

yes

# cpu_run_time_pref: 7200 sec = 2H

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/prefs.php?subset=project

Target CPU run time => 2H > 4H, 8H, 12H, 1 day

BOINC Update = rosetta@home

:)

---

I caught several tasks ending too early which mentioned in Dec - now on my own
computer. Dependence(what may cause this) is not found - all looks as normal for me.
The CPU target time was 2 hours and did not change.
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=403175973
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=403175972
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=403005728

P.S.
In general, I like the version 2.17. Over the last >2 months no serious crashes or memory leaks at all.

yes

# cpu_run_time_pref: 7200 sec = 2H

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/prefs.php?subset=project

Target CPU run time => 2H > 4H, 8H, 12H, 1 day

BOINC Update = rosetta@home

:)

I think you are missing Mad Max's point. The preferred run time was set at
2 hours but the three tasks each lasted less than 30 minutes and generated
11 decoys at most.

I've had some tasks with names starting with Ferredoxin-like_abinitio fail immediately on Mac with the following error:

ERROR: Option matching -relax:fastrelax_repeats not found in command line top-level context.

The tasks are :

405034651
405034650
404995301
404995300

Small point: the name for the last task (404995300) is 404995300 is Ferredoxin-lie_abinitio_SAVE_ALL_OUT_design_relax_fr28_009_23275_106_0. The k in like is missing.

I have the same problem. See my Result page if you want more information.

I have the same problem. See my Result page if you want more information.

Same here on Linux.

Edith says:
You have to link host results, account results are hidden to all other users.
See here for me: account and host

Same here on Linux.

Also on Linux, and also apparently the same problem.

Out of 24 complete work units since I set up BOINC/Rosetta yesterday, 9 have finished with the compute error "ERROR: Option matching -relax:fastrelax_repeats not found in command line top-level context"

Can I presume that this represents a bug in the S/W or should I be looking for H/W problems?

the latest result is: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=405000927

(Interesting to note that two other machines I have crunching have not encountered compute errors. However they have faster processors so they may be getting different types of work units.)

thanks,
hank

Can I presume that this represents a bug in the S/W or should I be looking for H/W problems?

No, looks like retries consistently fail so looks entirely like an issue with how the specific tasks were created. So it will be hit and miss as to whether a given host is assigned any of the failing tasks. Nothing to do with their speed, or OS or etc.

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense