More bug fixes and CASP related preparrations !

Please continue to let us know about problems, its very useful to have your feedback !

Cheers, Mike

---

http://beautifulproteins.blogspot.com/
http://www.miketyka.com/

cs-only-2-T4lys_7-10_20161_4_0

process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255)

ERROR: rsd_type_list.size()
ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/fragment/Frame.cc line: 62
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out
called boinc_finish

prior to the below task, this task rs_stg0_lrlx_t388__boincid_SAVE_ALL_OUT_19633_731_0 also suffered the same problem shown below.
rs_stg0_lrlx_t370__fullseq_run4_SAVE_ALL_OUT_20137_295_0
Outcome Client error
Client state Compute error
Exit status -177 (0xffffff4f)
CPU time 10239
stderr out

<core_client_version>6.10.43</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Maximum elapsed time exceeded
Reason: Breakpoint Encountered (0x80000003) at address 0x7C90120E

I have got two client errors as well:

334732044
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Aborted by user
Exit status -197 (0xffffff3b)
CPU time 0

334733457
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Aborted by user
Exit status -197 (0xffffff3b)
CPU time 7707.375

Jochen

---

I have got two client errors as well:

334732044
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Aborted by user
Exit status -197 (0xffffff3b)
CPU time 0

334733457
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Aborted by user
Exit status -197 (0xffffff3b)
CPU time 7707.375

Jochen

...are you saying you did NOT abort them?

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

...are you saying you did NOT abort them?

No, I did abort them.
The first one wasn't creating any CPU load (not even after restarting BOINC). The second one was a 'long running model', I aborted because it would have been running for a couple of more hours.

Sorry, should have written this in the first place...

Jochen

---

rs_stg0_lrlx_t000__casp8_test_SAVE_ALL_OUT.IGNORE_THE_REST_A_20212_6434_0

exit code 1073807364 (0x40010004)

Not sure what's up with this one.

---

Very new to this project so please bear with me.
I've had three failures this evening with W.Units
no's 306695360 task id 335895445,
306692344 task id 335892188 &
305866751 task id 335003355
All finish with
Outcome Client error
Client state Compute error and
stderr out <core_client_version>6.10.43</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
The system cannot find the path specified.
(0x3) - exit code 3(0x3)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
on Computer ID 1278225 running Window XP (SP 3)
If it's the machine that's not up for the gig, Please let me know

Kind regards, Tackleway

---

If it's the machine that's not up for the gig, Please let me know.

How much RAM do you have? Rosetta WUs require 512Mb per WU minimum.

---

If it's the machine that's not up for the gig, Please let me know.

How much RAM do you have? Rosetta WUs require 512Mb per WU minimum.

Hole in one! thanks, I'll carry on with another machine whilst some additional
RAM is installed in the other. Cheers, Tackleway

Hi, minirosetta 2.11 was just killed off by my Symantec protection system with the remark "danger level high"

regards lugal

I got an error with rb_05_04_129_340_rs_stg0_lrlx_t000__casp9_SAVE_ALL_OUT.IGNORE_THE_REST_B_20284_2938_1

ERROR: ERROR: no template_pdb provided for alignment 1DEGA_1
ERROR:: Exit from: ....srcprotocolsjd2ThreadingJobInputter.cc line: 258
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out
called boinc_finish

Same error as ohelig above (on Mac OS X)

Task 336126568 rb_05_04_129_340_rs_stg0_lrlx_t000__casp9_SAVE_ALL_OUT.IGNORE_THE_REST_B_20284_1401_0

ERROR: ERROR: no template_pdb provided for alignment 1DEGA_1
ERROR:: Exit from: src/protocols/jd2/ThreadingJobInputter.cc line: 258
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>

Hi, minirosetta 2.11 was just killed off by my Symantec protection system with the remark "danger level high"

regards lugal

5/6/2010 9:50 AM,
High,
minirosetta_2.11_windows_intelx86.exe detected by SONAR,
Quarantined,Resolved - No Action,
SONAR,
2010.05.05.048,109.2.3.12,
minirosetta_2.11_windows_intelx86.exe,
File Based,
Fully removed

I had a similar experience with minirosetta_2.10

Why does Symantec think this is a threat?

---

Rosetta 2.11 works well on a Pentium Quad core, but still "hangs" on a PIII 1.4 GHz, like earlier versions did on both of my machines. The program is still running and graphics can be viewed, but the RMSD flatlines and there is no progress. I also run SETI@home without issues on both machines.

---

A flat RMSD is not indicative of a problem. It just means that the program is having trouble finding a better configuration for the protein. Are there any other symptoms of "hangs"?

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

Wrt to RMS "flatlines":

We are now running real live true blind targets, which means we do not know the answer (unlike during testing where we do) and so we cannot compute the RMSD since there is nothing to compare to (RMSD is the root mean square deviation from the experimentally determined fold found in nature).
Hence the RMSD flatlines!

Mike

---

http://beautifulproteins.blogspot.com/
http://www.miketyka.com/

Hi, minirosetta 2.11 was just killed off by my Symantec protection system with the remark "danger level high"

regards lugal

5/6/2010 9:50 AM,
High,
minirosetta_2.11_windows_intelx86.exe detected by SONAR,
Quarantined,Resolved - No Action,
SONAR,
2010.05.05.048,109.2.3.12,
minirosetta_2.11_windows_intelx86.exe,
File Based,
Fully removed

I had a similar experience with minirosetta_2.10

Why does Symantec think this is a threat?

In the past this has come up with Norton Internet Security, even though Norton Antivirus (standalone) and Norton 360 find no problems.

If that's the case for you (running NIS) try and exclude the rosetta executable, or set up NIS not to scan the folder in which it's found. The first is a temporary solution that needs to be re-done each time a new rosetta version comes out, while the latter is a permanent fix which risks a real problem getting in there (none I've ever noticed though).

---

All tasks erroed out when downloading.

<core_client_version>6.10.43</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
WU download error: couldn't get input files:
<file_xfer_error>
  <file_name>relax_options_lrm_ghoo_sc12_run01_A_yfsong</file_name>
  <error_code>-224</error_code>
  <error_message>file not found</error_message>
</file_xfer_error>
<file_xfer_error>
  <file_name>S_rb1_1unr_native_0000.pdb</file_name>
  <error_code>-224</error_code>
  <error_message>file not found</error_message>
</file_xfer_error>
<file_xfer_error>
  <file_name>yfsong_lrm_ghoo_sc12_run01_A.zip</file_name>
  <error_code>-224</error_code>
  <error_message>file not found</error_message>
</file_xfer_error>
<file_xfer_error>
  <file_name>boinc_rb1_1unr.pdb</file_name>
  <error_code>-224</error_code>
  <error_message>file not found</error_message>
</file_xfer_error>

</message>
]]>

I have reset and reattached the project with no result, stll the same error. Any idea what to do more? 7 different machines (Intel C2D, Xeon, WinXP x86, WinXP x64).

One of my two running Rosetta tasks completed, and no new task was downloaded. In fact, no new Rosetta tasks have downloaded for a couple of days. Windows Task Manager shows two instances of minirosetta_2.11 running, but only a single Rosetta task is indicated by the BOINC Manager, and it is running at high priority.

I began running the Colatz Conjecture tasks on my GPU a couple of days ago, and I don't believe that Rosetta has downloaded any new WUs since that time (although I could be mistaken). Do these projects interfere with each other?

I also wondered why two instances of minirosetta are running on my two CPUs if only a single task is being processed. The processing certainly does not appear to be any faster. In fact, it appears to have slowed down.

Is there anything I need to do to correct this situation?

deesy