Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta 2.00
Author | Message |
---|---|
Yifan Song Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 26 May 09 Posts: 62 Credit: 7,322 RAC: 0 |
minirosetta 2.00 is now up. The energy function optimization we\'ve been working on for the last few month are now in. This version also fixes some stability issues brought in by 1.98. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Oct 05 Posts: 692 Credit: 21,912,365 RAC: 5,047 ![]() |
|
P . P . L . Send message Joined: 20 Aug 06 Posts: 581 Credit: 4,865,274 RAC: 0 |
Hi. Is this right that the linux gnu is so big, at 31.4 MB that\'s huge plus the new db file. Espeacially if you have a lot of rigs, look out. ![]() |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Project administrator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 3508 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
PPL has a point. Looks like both Linux versions are more then 4x larger then prior releases. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Speedy![]() Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 159 Credit: 583,488 RAC: 0 |
PPL has a point. Looks like both Linux versions are more then 4x larger then prior releases. If this is the case I will wait until the size decreases again before I return to this project. Have a crunching good day!! |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Project administrator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 3508 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
speedy, I should clarify, we are talking about the download size of the new program version. It most likely is just due to a compiler parameter that incorporated some debug capabilities or something. So, it does not necessarily effect how much memory is required to run. The concern would just be if you have very limited bandwidth available to perform the initial download. Or perhaps if you have very limited disk space available to BOINC. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
nick n![]() Send message Joined: 26 Aug 07 Posts: 49 Credit: 219,102 RAC: 0 |
Seems to work fine but the graphics lock up and need to be force quitted in activity monitor in OS X 10.6.1. |
Michael G.R. Send message Joined: 11 Nov 05 Posts: 264 Credit: 9,224,416 RAC: 5,362 ![]() |
Seems to work fine but the graphics lock up and need to be force quitted in activity monitor in OS X 10.6.1. I\'m on OS X 10.6.1 and the graphics are fine here (though I haven\'t left them running for very long -- did you experience a lock up after a long time?). |
DJStarfox Send message Joined: 19 Jul 07 Posts: 140 Credit: 731,718 RAC: 382 |
Did the disk space requirements for this new version change? I\'m getting: 09-Nov-2009 09:09:12 [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent 09-Nov-2009 09:09:12 [rosetta@home] Message from server: There was work but you don\'t have enough disk space allocated. 09-Nov-2009 09:09:12 [rosetta@home] Message from server: An additional 8 MB is needed. Disk tab in BoincMgr only says 10.2 MB used by BOINC, even after resetting the project. How much space needs to be free to run the project? |
zpm Send message Joined: 21 Mar 09 Posts: 6 Credit: 349,801 RAC: 0 |
Did the disk space requirements for this new version change? I\'m getting: set the limit to 1 GB.... |
AMD_is_logical Send message Joined: 20 Dec 05 Posts: 299 Credit: 31,460,681 RAC: 0 |
These mix_score12 WUs gave validate errors for both crunchers: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=268883328 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=268921690 |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Project administrator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 3508 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
DJStarfox if you have Linux boxes, see the discussion previously in this thread about how the size of the executable seems to have increased significantly in version 2.00. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Gilles J. Seguin Send message Joined: 3 Apr 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 8,617,360 RAC: 0 |
PPL has a point. Looks like both Linux versions are more then 4x larger then prior releases. The cli command would display debug info $ nm minirosetta_2.00_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu that is, the file has not being strip. other improvement would be to used shared option with prelink utility. That is, static linking is far from being optimal. Here the CPU is quad core. i would like to know also what is hapening with availability of client for GPU hardware. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Oct 05 Posts: 692 Credit: 21,912,365 RAC: 5,047 ![]() |
|
AMD_is_logical Send message Joined: 20 Dec 05 Posts: 299 Credit: 31,460,681 RAC: 0 |
other improvement would be to used shared option Static linking is needed for portability. A non-static binary would probably not run properly on a lot of Linux machines. |
Evan Send message Joined: 23 Dec 05 Posts: 268 Credit: 402,585 RAC: 0 |
This one had a validate error on both attempts. mix_score12_correct_B_rlbd_1vie__IGNORE_THE_RESTlr13_DECOY_15624_476 |
[DPC]DeApen~BaDu Send message Joined: 17 Oct 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 102,981 RAC: 0 |
Can it be that this version delivers somewhat less performance? I\'m down 20% since the introduction of the 2.00 version. http://tadah.mine.nu/graphs/flushHistoryGraph.php?tabel=subteamoffset&prefix=rah&naam=BaDu&team=[DPC]DeApen The introduction was on the 6th my queue has 3 days of work, so you can see the preformance decrease since running 2.00 Is there a way to switch back to 1.98? |
transient![]() Send message Joined: 30 Sep 06 Posts: 376 Credit: 8,798,867 RAC: 0 |
No you can\'t switch versions. 2.00 has been out only for 4 day\'s. That seems to be a bit short to me to have such an effect on your RAC. |
[DPC]DeApen~BaDu Send message Joined: 17 Oct 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 102,981 RAC: 0 |
The graph is not showing RAC but daily points over the last 7 days generated bij a stats engine. |
transient![]() Send message Joined: 30 Sep 06 Posts: 376 Credit: 8,798,867 RAC: 0 |
The graph is not showing RAC but daily points over the last 7 days generated bij a stats engine. True, but when looking up your account at boincstats, I did not see such a drop. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Minirosetta 2.00
©2019 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org