Minirosetta 2.00

Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta 2.00

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 5 · Next

AuthorMessage
Yifan Song
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 26 May 09
Posts: 62
Credit: 7,322
RAC: 0
Message 63966 - Posted: 6 Nov 2009, 0:10:20 UTC

minirosetta 2.00 is now up.
The energy function optimization we've been working on for the last few month are now in.
This version also fixes some stability issues brought in by 1.98.
ID: 63966 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Chilean
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 05
Posts: 711
Credit: 26,694,507
RAC: 0
Message 63967 - Posted: 6 Nov 2009, 2:59:25 UTC

GPU support yet?? :D

The new BOINC version apparently likes my GPU and keeps requesting for work :(
ID: 63967 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
P . P . L .

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 06
Posts: 581
Credit: 4,865,274
RAC: 0
Message 63968 - Posted: 6 Nov 2009, 3:05:09 UTC

Hi.

Is this right that the linux gnu is so big, at 31.4 MB that's huge

plus the new db file.

Espeacially if you have a lot of rigs, look out.



ID: 63968 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 63971 - Posted: 6 Nov 2009, 5:55:35 UTC

PPL has a point. Looks like both Linux versions are more then 4x larger then prior releases.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 63971 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Speedy
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Sep 05
Posts: 163
Credit: 800,690
RAC: 466
Message 63972 - Posted: 6 Nov 2009, 7:24:33 UTC - in response to Message 63971.  

PPL has a point. Looks like both Linux versions are more then 4x larger then prior releases.

If this is the case I will wait until the size decreases again before I return to this project.
Have a crunching good day!!
ID: 63972 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 63973 - Posted: 6 Nov 2009, 18:56:51 UTC

speedy, I should clarify, we are talking about the download size of the new program version. It most likely is just due to a compiler parameter that incorporated some debug capabilities or something. So, it does not necessarily effect how much memory is required to run.

The concern would just be if you have very limited bandwidth available to perform the initial download. Or perhaps if you have very limited disk space available to BOINC.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 63973 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
nick n
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Aug 07
Posts: 49
Credit: 219,102
RAC: 0
Message 63975 - Posted: 7 Nov 2009, 1:38:51 UTC

Seems to work fine but the graphics lock up and need to be force quitted in activity monitor in OS X 10.6.1.
ID: 63975 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Michael G.R.

Send message
Joined: 11 Nov 05
Posts: 264
Credit: 11,247,510
RAC: 0
Message 63977 - Posted: 8 Nov 2009, 0:56:50 UTC - in response to Message 63975.  

Seems to work fine but the graphics lock up and need to be force quitted in activity monitor in OS X 10.6.1.


I'm on OS X 10.6.1 and the graphics are fine here (though I haven't left them running for very long -- did you experience a lock up after a long time?).
ID: 63977 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 07
Posts: 145
Credit: 1,235,310
RAC: 188
Message 63984 - Posted: 9 Nov 2009, 14:19:59 UTC

Did the disk space requirements for this new version change? I'm getting:
09-Nov-2009 09:09:12 [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
09-Nov-2009 09:09:12 [rosetta@home] Message from server: There was work but you don't have enough disk space allocated.
09-Nov-2009 09:09:12 [rosetta@home] Message from server: An additional 8 MB is needed.

Disk tab in BoincMgr only says 10.2 MB used by BOINC, even after resetting the project. How much space needs to be free to run the project?
ID: 63984 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
zpm

Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 09
Posts: 6
Credit: 349,801
RAC: 0
Message 63986 - Posted: 9 Nov 2009, 15:25:06 UTC - in response to Message 63984.  

Did the disk space requirements for this new version change? I'm getting:
09-Nov-2009 09:09:12 [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
09-Nov-2009 09:09:12 [rosetta@home] Message from server: There was work but you don't have enough disk space allocated.
09-Nov-2009 09:09:12 [rosetta@home] Message from server: An additional 8 MB is needed.

Disk tab in BoincMgr only says 10.2 MB used by BOINC, even after resetting the project. How much space needs to be free to run the project?


set the limit to 1 GB....
ID: 63986 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
AMD_is_logical

Send message
Joined: 20 Dec 05
Posts: 299
Credit: 31,460,681
RAC: 0
Message 63987 - Posted: 9 Nov 2009, 16:32:14 UTC

ID: 63987 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 63989 - Posted: 9 Nov 2009, 16:35:16 UTC

DJStarfox if you have Linux boxes, see the discussion previously in this thread about how the size of the executable seems to have increased significantly in version 2.00.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 63989 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Gilles J. Seguin

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 09
Posts: 2
Credit: 8,617,360
RAC: 0
Message 63993 - Posted: 9 Nov 2009, 21:12:44 UTC - in response to Message 63972.  

PPL has a point. Looks like both Linux versions are more then 4x larger then prior releases.

If this is the case I will wait until the size decreases again before I return to this project.


The cli command would display debug info
$ nm minirosetta_2.00_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
that is, the file has not being strip.

other improvement would be to used shared option
with prelink utility. That is, static linking is far from being optimal.
Here the CPU is quad core.

i would like to know also what is hapening with availability of client
for GPU hardware.
ID: 63993 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Chilean
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 05
Posts: 711
Credit: 26,694,507
RAC: 0
Message 63995 - Posted: 10 Nov 2009, 2:24:28 UTC

2.00 Works perfectly under Windows 7 Ultimate x64.

Including graphics.
ID: 63995 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
AMD_is_logical

Send message
Joined: 20 Dec 05
Posts: 299
Credit: 31,460,681
RAC: 0
Message 63996 - Posted: 10 Nov 2009, 3:40:18 UTC - in response to Message 63993.  

other improvement would be to used shared option
with prelink utility. That is, static linking is far from being optimal.

Static linking is needed for portability. A non-static binary would probably not run properly on a lot of Linux machines.
ID: 63996 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Evan

Send message
Joined: 23 Dec 05
Posts: 268
Credit: 402,585
RAC: 0
Message 64000 - Posted: 10 Nov 2009, 8:35:30 UTC

This one had a validate error on both attempts.
mix_score12_correct_B_rlbd_1vie__IGNORE_THE_RESTlr13_DECOY_15624_476
ID: 64000 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
[DPC]DeApen~BaDu

Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 09
Posts: 2
Credit: 102,981
RAC: 0
Message 64004 - Posted: 10 Nov 2009, 17:02:18 UTC

Can it be that this version delivers somewhat less performance?
I'm down 20% since the introduction of the 2.00 version.

http://tadah.mine.nu/graphs/flushHistoryGraph.php?tabel=subteamoffset&prefix=rah&naam=BaDu&team=[DPC]DeApen
The introduction was on the 6th my queue has 3 days of work, so you can see the preformance decrease since running 2.00

Is there a way to switch back to 1.98?
ID: 64004 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
[DPC]DeApen~BaDu

Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 09
Posts: 2
Credit: 102,981
RAC: 0
Message 64006 - Posted: 10 Nov 2009, 20:12:06 UTC

The graph is not showing RAC but daily points over the last 7 days generated bij a stats engine.
ID: 64006 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Yifan Song
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 26 May 09
Posts: 62
Credit: 7,322
RAC: 0
Message 64012 - Posted: 11 Nov 2009, 9:01:21 UTC

The large increase to the executable size could be due to the inclusion of a number of protocols that has been developed over the last 2 years. Those protocols were not able to compile with the boinc build until now.
There shouldn't be any difference in running the tasks though, the only difference is the time it takes to update.
ID: 64012 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 64019 - Posted: 11 Nov 2009, 18:50:02 UTC

If this is the cause, then how did the Windows version get by without any noticeable increase in size?
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 64019 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 5 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta 2.00



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org