Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta v1.15 bug thread
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
Evan Send message Joined: 23 Dec 05 Posts: 268 Credit: 402,585 RAC: 0 |
I hope this is the last of the few. it got there in the end but needed a bit of kicking. 159497259 |
David Emigh Send message Joined: 13 Mar 06 Posts: 158 Credit: 417,178 RAC: 0 |
Finally, a success with mini 1.15! This computer, hostid=599043, made it to the end of a 24 hour run on resultid=159274026. It may be important to note that this is a 64 bit processor with 4GB RAM and 8GB of swap space... Rosie, Rosie, she's our gal, If she can't do it, no one shall! |
David Emigh Send message Joined: 13 Mar 06 Posts: 158 Credit: 417,178 RAC: 0 |
I am 0/5 now on mini 1.15 workunits with these two computers: Make that 0/8 now. Neither of the two above linked computers, normally stable, reliable crunchers, has been able to successfully complete a mini 1.15 workunit since that application version was released on Rosetta. I have set the runtime preference for the two computers down to 3 hours, since that time frame seems to have worked for my wingmen on all of these failed tasks. Rosie, Rosie, she's our gal, If she can't do it, no one shall! |
Dave Mickey Send message Joined: 29 Dec 07 Posts: 33 Credit: 4,136,957 RAC: 0 |
One cruncher (333M Celeron, 192MB, NT4) got some mini 1.15s and every one (of about 5 or 6) did the thing where they say they have started, but accumulate no elapsed CPU time (remains as 0) and time to complete is reported blank, and they certainly seem to be going no where. After aborting them (giving each a fair chance to actually compute), turned off new work for a while (and SETI ran in the mean time), then it collected some Beta 5.96 WUs, and is crunching them now, seemingly OK. Will have to wait to see if more 1.15s come along, but it doesn't look good. Seems to be solid distinction of runnable vs. not. Other machine (500M P3, 512M, W2K) has gotten one mini 1.15, and ran it OK. |
David Emigh Send message Joined: 13 Mar 06 Posts: 158 Credit: 417,178 RAC: 0 |
I suspect the focus of development energy has already shifted to 1.16, but if there is any information still to be gleaned from the failures of 1.15, the data in this post may be significant. I changed the runtime preference for the two computers that I've been whining about for several days now, decreasing it from 24 hours to 3 hours. The result was dramatic. On one system, my success rate with mini 1.15 went from 0% to 100%. That computer is now 5/5 with the formerly un-runnable application. link to host The other system is still struggling, but the type of error reported has changed from "compute error" to "validate error." link to host Rosie, Rosie, she's our gal, If she can't do it, no one shall! |
glaesum Send message Joined: 16 Oct 06 Posts: 21 Credit: 508,632 RAC: 0 |
so... ...it doesn't look terribly hopeful that minirosetta is fully ready for the launch of CASP8 next monday, does it!!! |
mewbysea Send message Joined: 29 Jan 06 Posts: 17 Credit: 15,750,911 RAC: 708 |
I've been having the same problem as David with a runtime preference of 10 hours. I'll adjust to a shorter runtime and see if that helps. |
sslickerson Send message Joined: 14 Oct 05 Posts: 101 Credit: 578,497 RAC: 0 |
I've been away from the boards for a few days and I just noticed 3 WU of mine errored out (all minirosetta). This appears to be a fairly known problem after reading about all the problems everyone else has had. My question is this, am I going to get credit for the lost time (about 600 credits by my count)? Timothy |
staffann Send message Joined: 7 Oct 07 Posts: 7 Credit: 69,937 RAC: 0 |
First posted in the "problems with minirosetta 1.+" thread but realised that this is probably a better place: I just had a minirosetta 1.15 fail right after I had hit the graphics button. My computer runs WinXPSP2 on an Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and has a NVidia graphics card. AV is Avast. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=160186210 2008-05-02 13:42:02|World Community Grid|Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks 2008-05-02 13:42:02|World Community Grid|Reporting 1 tasks 2008-05-02 13:42:07|World Community Grid|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 601] 2008-05-02 13:42:07|World Community Grid|Deferring communication for 1 min 1 sec 2008-05-02 13:42:07|World Community Grid|Reason: requested by project 2008-05-02 13:45:11|rosetta@home|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec 2008-05-02 13:45:11|rosetta@home|Reason: Unrecoverable error for result 1who__BOINC_ABINITIO_IGNORE_THE_REST-S25-9-S3-3--1who_-_3092_1911_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) 2008-05-02 13:45:11|rosetta@home|Computation for task 1who__BOINC_ABINITIO_IGNORE_THE_REST-S25-9-S3-3--1who_-_3092_1911_0 finished 2008-05-02 13:45:11|rosetta@home|Output file 1who__BOINC_ABINITIO_IGNORE_THE_REST-S25-9-S3-3--1who_-_3092_1911_0_0 for task 1who__BOINC_ABINITIO_IGNORE_THE_REST-S25-9-S3-3--1who_-_3092_1911_0 absent 2008-05-02 13:45:11|World Community Grid|Resuming task faah4030_NSC119913_chem3D_B_xmd05230_02_1 using faah version 603 Computer & BOINC data: 2008-05-02 09:56:38||Starting BOINC client version 5.10.20 for windows_intelx86 2008-05-02 09:56:38||log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops 2008-05-02 09:56:38||Libraries: libcurl/7.16.4 OpenSSL/0.9.8e zlib/1.2.3 2008-05-02 09:56:38||Data directory: C:ProgramBOINC 2008-05-02 09:56:38|SETI@home|Found app_info.xml; using anonymous platform 2008-05-02 09:56:38||Processor: 2 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ [x86 Family 15 Model 43 Stepping 1] 2008-05-02 09:56:38||Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 3dnow mmx 2008-05-02 09:56:38||OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Professional Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00) 2008-05-02 09:56:38||Memory: 1023.23 MB physical, 3.40 GB virtual 2008-05-02 09:56:38||Disk: 76.32 GB total, 5.24 GB free 2008-05-02 09:56:38||Local time is UTC +1 hours |
david @ TPS Send message Joined: 26 Nov 06 Posts: 3 Credit: 881,762 RAC: 0 |
My Celeron with WinME seems happy with the mini's. Dave |
amgthis Send message Joined: 25 Mar 06 Posts: 81 Credit: 203,879,282 RAC: 0 |
My minirosetta 1.15 apps crash about 50-60% of the time on AMD 64's and Intel conroe duals Intel Kentsfield quads and none are overclocked. Typical error is # 107374. |
(_KoDAk_) Send message Joined: 18 Jul 06 Posts: 109 Credit: 1,859,263 RAC: 0 |
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?hostid=736555 Invalid Task ID 159962434 Task ID 159962433 Task ID 159962424 Task ID 159318279 Task ID 159128030 - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Out Of Memory (C++ Exception) (0xe06d7363) at address 0x766C42EB WTF ????? |
Blacksun Send message Joined: 2 May 07 Posts: 2 Credit: 1,284,699 RAC: 0 |
|
Evan Send message Joined: 23 Dec 05 Posts: 268 Credit: 402,585 RAC: 0 |
|
(_KoDAk_) Send message Joined: 18 Jul 06 Posts: 109 Credit: 1,859,263 RAC: 0 |
Client error https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=158424537 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=158422144 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=158418985 |
Venturini Dario[VENETO] Send message Joined: 25 May 07 Posts: 22 Credit: 245,028 RAC: 0 |
Not sure if this is a bug, but it's definitely weird: Workunit 146096927 stderr out <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures 14353.2 cpu seconds This process generated 14 decoys from 14 attempts ====================================================== BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down... BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down... called boinc_finish # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures 15500.1 cpu seconds This process generated 1 decoys from 1 attempts ====================================================== BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down... BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down... called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Valid Claimed credit 80.519063844009 Granted credit 5.15238734890731 application version 1.15 |
amgthis Send message Joined: 25 Mar 06 Posts: 81 Credit: 203,879,282 RAC: 0 |
The mini rosetta 1.15 units just continually crash. Why keep queuing them to distribute until the problems are sorted? People are wasting k watts of power for nothing in the meantime... I would think we would just line up 5.96 units until the bugs were sorted instead of wasting thousands of watts of energy for nothing. ???? |
sslickerson Send message Joined: 14 Oct 05 Posts: 101 Credit: 578,497 RAC: 0 |
The mini rosetta 1.15 units just continually crash. Why keep queuing them to I just abort them as soon as I see them but I'm sure that may be a problem for someone such as yourself with 14K RAC, sadly I only have 1 computer... I would set Rosetta to "no new work" for the time being and come back later when this gets all sorted out. |
glaesum Send message Joined: 16 Oct 06 Posts: 21 Credit: 508,632 RAC: 0 |
My Celeron with WinME seems happy with the mini's. that's interesting as it must mean that win98 is only one tweak away from working... meanwhile, as long I'm trashing under 50% of tasks sent I'll keep going on that pc (no probs on the XP m/ch at all). |
amgthis Send message Joined: 25 Mar 06 Posts: 81 Credit: 203,879,282 RAC: 0 |
The mini rosetta 1.15 units just continually crash. Why keep queuing them to |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta v1.15 bug thread
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org