Problems with Rosetta 5.95

Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta 5.95

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile bblum

Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 06
Posts: 6
Credit: 4,077
RAC: 0
Message 51937 - Posted: 14 Mar 2008, 1:08:02 UTC

Please post any problems you experience with Rosetta 5.95 here and we will do our best to address them as quickly as possible. Thanks so much for your help.
ID: 51937 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Angus

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 412
Credit: 321,053
RAC: 0
Message 51950 - Posted: 15 Mar 2008, 2:46:08 UTC
Last modified: 15 Mar 2008, 2:46:36 UTC

It's simply amazing how a new release can be a minor bug fix on Ralph,
The Ralph executable has been updated to 5.95. This version fixes a small bug in the previous version.

but when it gets to Rosetta (after only 6 days of testing) it is a major change in process.
Proudly Banned from Predictator@Home and now Cosmology@home as well. Added SETI to the list today. Temporary ban only - so need to work harder :)



"You can't fix stupid" (Ron White)
ID: 51950 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Christoph

Send message
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 57
Credit: 1,512,386
RAC: 0
Message 51959 - Posted: 15 Mar 2008, 11:31:43 UTC - in response to Message 51950.  

It's simply amazing how a new release can be a minor bug fix on Ralph,
The Ralph executable has been updated to 5.95. This version fixes a small bug in the previous version.

but when it gets to Rosetta (after only 6 days of testing) it is a major change in process.

The previous version on Rosetta@home was 5.93 and with 5.94 they released that new feature.
ID: 51959 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
M.L.

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 06
Posts: 182
Credit: 180,462
RAC: 0
Message 51990 - Posted: 17 Mar 2008, 7:13:45 UTC
Last modified: 17 Mar 2008, 7:40:55 UTC

Task ID 148077157
Name t028_1_NMRREF_1_t028_1_id_model_01_idlIGNORE_THE_REST_core_2979_14912_0
Workunit 135014118
Created 14 Mar 2008 12:12:52 UTC
Sent 14 Mar 2008 12:13:01 UTC
Received 17 Mar 2008 7:03:54 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Success
Client state Done
Exit status 0 (0x0)
Computer ID 735230
Report deadline 24 Mar 2008 12:13:01 UTC
CPU time 8796.89
stderr out

<core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
# random seed: 1213689
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
======================================================
DONE :: 1 starting structures 8796.41 cpu seconds
This process generated 10829700 decoys from -863090173 attempts
0 starting pdbs were skipped
======================================================


BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down...
BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down...

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Validate state Valid
Claimed credit 36.3455313825437
Granted credit 32.0810913987817
application version 5.95

The number of decoys is suspicious!! If genuine is this a record?
ID: 51990 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile bblum

Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 06
Posts: 6
Credit: 4,077
RAC: 0
Message 51992 - Posted: 17 Mar 2008, 20:22:26 UTC

Cristoph is correct: the new diversified beta sampling was added to version 5.94 on Ralph, which never made it to Rosetta@home because of the small bug that we discovered during the course of our tests on Ralph and corrected in version 5.95.
ID: 51992 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf

Send message
Joined: 16 Dec 05
Posts: 31
Credit: 153,110
RAC: 0
Message 52012 - Posted: 19 Mar 2008, 1:59:12 UTC

I have a workunit taking already 4 hours now, it is on 95% and it takes 30 seconds to go one step further. Is this normal ?



ID: 52012 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 52013 - Posted: 19 Mar 2008, 2:58:12 UTC - in response to Message 52012.  

I have a workunit taking already 4 hours now, it is on 95% and it takes 30 seconds to go one step further. Is this normal ?


If you are referring to that foldanddock task on your list, yes, those take much longer to complete a step. And if your target runtime is 3 hours, but you are still working on the first model, yes, it is normal for it to continue until that model is completed.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 52013 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile alpha

Send message
Joined: 4 Nov 06
Posts: 27
Credit: 1,550,107
RAC: 0
Message 52100 - Posted: 24 Mar 2008, 8:36:51 UTC

I woke up to find two more computer errors this morning from one computer:

Task 150170224
Task 150294704

Exit status -1073741819 (0xc0000005) on both. Zero credit.
ID: 52100 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
P . P . L .

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 06
Posts: 581
Credit: 4,865,274
RAC: 0
Message 52159 - Posted: 28 Mar 2008, 4:31:42 UTC
Last modified: 28 Mar 2008, 4:32:06 UTC

This is more like a bad task than the app, but here you go.

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=137906588

core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# cpu_run_time_pref: 21600
# random seed: 3365262
ERROR:: Exit from: .pose.cc line: 800

pete.
ID: 52159 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Path7

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 07
Posts: 128
Credit: 61,751
RAC: 0
Message 52162 - Posted: 28 Mar 2008, 11:22:22 UTC - in response to Message 52159.  

This is more like a bad task than the app, but here you go.

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=137906588

core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[............
.....................
...............ERROR:: Exit from: .pose.cc line: 800

pete.

Hello Peter Leman,
I'm surprised to see you posting in the 5.95 thread.
From: (https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/apps.php) the applications page you can see the 5.96 is the latest application.
It doesn't matter much in the situation of WU137906588, since the other computer (running the 5.96) also error-ed out the same way your computer did. But it might become a problem when your computer will continue to crunch using the 5.95 instead of the 5.96.
Can't find the 5.95 anymore on my Windows XP and Ubuntu 7.10.

Have a nice day,
Path7.
ID: 52162 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
P . P . L .

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 06
Posts: 581
Credit: 4,865,274
RAC: 0
Message 52169 - Posted: 29 Mar 2008, 2:13:16 UTC - in response to Message 52162.  

This is more like a bad task than the app, but here you go.

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=137906588

core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[............
.....................
...............ERROR:: Exit from: .pose.cc line: 800

pete.

Hello Peter Leman,
I'm surprised to see you posting in the 5.95 thread.
From: (https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/apps.php) the applications page you can see the 5.96 is the latest application.
It doesn't matter much in the situation of WU137906588, since the other computer (running the 5.96) also error-ed out the same way your computer did. But it might become a problem when your computer will continue to crunch using the 5.95 instead of the 5.96.
Can't find the 5.95 anymore on my Windows XP and Ubuntu 7.10.

Have a nice day,
Path7.


Hi Path.

I will be going to the newer app when my cashe of tasks runs out, never fear.

pete.


ID: 52169 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta 5.95



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org