Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.82
Author | Message |
---|---|
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Please post any problem reports with Rosetta version 5.82 here. I'll be moving prior posts that clearly identify v5.82 to this thread later on today. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
since there is no 5.82 thread i will post here: from boinc mangager 12/1/2007 1:01:06 AM|rosetta@home|Task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_2342426_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 12/1/2007 1:01:06 AM|rosetta@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 12/1/2007 1:01:11 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_2342426_0 using rosetta version 582 12/1/2007 4:41:44 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_2342426_0 finished what does this mean? |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
since there is no 5.82 thread i will post here: well it kinda failed, but then the project decided to make it again, and then it succeeded |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
since there is no 5.82 thread i will post here: oh my blind eyes sometimes, i should have saw the restart, but the exit 0 and no finished file? thats got me puzzled |
Holmis Send message Joined: 15 Nov 07 Posts: 6 Credit: 975,490 RAC: 0 |
oh my blind eyes sometimes, i should have saw the restart, but the exit 0 and no finished file? thats got me puzzled It happens to me sometimes, it's usually when I "overload" my computer. To many things to do at once. It's quite harmless and you probably do not need to reset as suggested. This is one of those things that has been occurring with Bonic for a long time. Don't think anyone really knows why... /Holmis |
ramostol Send message Joined: 6 Feb 07 Posts: 64 Credit: 584,052 RAC: 0 |
This is still (I believe) a general issue, but since the wu in question is a 5.82 file: From local message file: 02-Dec-2007 12:14:08 [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 63171 seconds of work, reporting 5 completed tasks 02-Dec-2007 12:14:13 [rosetta@home] Scheduler request succeeded: got 3 new tasks 02-Dec-2007 12:14:15 [rosetta@home] Started download of vf_1rnbA.fasta.gz 02-Dec-2007 12:14:15 [rosetta@home] Started download of vf_1rnbA.psipred_ss2.gz 02-Dec-2007 12:15:37 [rosetta@home] Task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_2739310_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 02-Dec-2007 12:15:37 [rosetta@home] If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 02-Dec-2007 12:15:37 [---] Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 02-Dec-2007 12:15:37 [rosetta@home] Temporarily failed download of vf_1rnbA.fasta.gz: can't resolve hostname 02-Dec-2007 12:15:37 [rosetta@home] Temporarily failed download of vf_1rnbA.psipred_ss2.gz: can't resolve hostname 02-Dec-2007 12:15:37 [rosetta@home] Started download of boinc_vf_aa1rnbA03_05.200_v1_3.gz 02-Dec-2007 12:15:38 [rosetta@home] Started download of boinc_vf_aa1rnbA09_05.200_v1_3.gz 02-Dec-2007 12:15:38 [rosetta@home] Restarting task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_2739310_0 using rosetta version 582 02-Dec-2007 12:15:39 [---] Access to reference site succeeded - project servers may be temporarily down. 02-Dec-2007 12:15:45 [rosetta@home] Finished download of boinc_vf_aa1rnbA03_05.200_v1_3.gz 02-Dec-2007 12:15:45 [rosetta@home] Started download of boinc_vf_aa1rnbA15_05.200_v1_3.gz [etc etc] The computing of Rosetta tasks is now as before sensitive to unstable internet connections. Whether this is a Boinc of Rosetta problem I don't know, but I feel that such consequences of internet failures are unneccessary and should be addressed. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
This is still (I believe) a general issue, but since the wu in question is a 5.82 file: your having the same error as I had with the same group of work unit but a different fragment. 12/1/2007 1:01:06 AM|rosetta@home|Task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_2342426_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 12/1/2007 1:01:06 AM|rosetta@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 12/1/2007 1:01:11 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_2342426_0 using rosetta version 582 12/1/2007 4:41:44 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_2342426_0 finished |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
ramostol is actually having two issues. One with network connectivity, and the other with tasks completing with no finish line. And both happened to occur at the same time in the messages shown. I had download problems with the same two files last night. boinc_vf_aa1rnbA03_05.200_v1_3.gz & boinc_vf_aa1rnbA09_05.200_v1_3.gz The BOINC system is very resiliant. When your client requests files, there is a list of 3 servers that it goes through to get it. If the first fails it tries the second. Then the third, and if the client still doesn't have the file, it runs the list again (because the list is actually of 6 URLs). If you make it to the bottom of the list without getting the file, I'm not clear on whether that's when the client gives up and chalks up a permanent error, or not. Anyway, I wanted you to know that the internet problem that occured there was for work you were downloading at the time. And the task failure there, with no finish line, was an unrelated event that occured as a task was completing. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
M.L. Send message Joined: 21 Nov 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 180,462 RAC: 0 |
created 24 Nov 2007 12:43:55 UTC name CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_2298621 canonical result 122751258 granted credit 44.73 minimum quorum 1 initial replication 1 max # of error/total/success tasks 1, 2, 1 Task ID click for details Computer Sent Time reported or deadline explain Server state explain Outcome explain Client state explain CPU time (sec) claimed credit granted credit 122751258 580603 24 Nov 2007 13:29:27 UTC 4 Dec 2007 21:12:32 UTC Over Success Done 10,567.80 44.73 45.23 124543662 510574 4 Dec 2007 13:32:59 UTC 14 Dec 2007 13:32:59 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- --- Have aborted this task on 4 Dec {for pc 510574} on 5.82 |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
i had a perfect run with this task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3193642_0, but I took a 8 point hit in granted credit vs claimed credit. That just sucks peanuts beyond belief! That is the worst credit grant differential I have had in a long time! |
Astro Send message Joined: 2 Oct 05 Posts: 987 Credit: 500,253 RAC: 0 |
i had a perfect run with this task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3193642_0, but I took a 8 point hit in granted credit vs claimed credit. That just sucks peanuts beyond belief! That is the worst credit grant differential I have had in a long time! Hi Greg, I added your host to my files and ran it. Below is what all your work that is still available looks like. Notice that your Granted Credit/hour for that task is similar to what you get for other jobs. I then grabbed the same type jobs from work done by your machine, my AMD64 2800, and also that of the number one machine at rosetta belonging to MSO. I sorted them by TaskID, then deleted many of MSO's work so this would fit on one screen. With this you can compare how your machine does against a similar machine and also against the best machine. Notice everyone that I've looked at for that Job received 1.81 credit/decoy. I've been collecting samples on many hosts, and everyone I have shows that same amount/decoy. I.E everyone got paid the same for the same work done. MSO just does it much faster. Your data is Black, Mine is Red, and that of MSO is blue. Looks like ours are yeilding the same amount. I do see where some decoys within the same job type seem to take longer/shorter than others, and that I can't explain. However, it happens to everyone I see, so in that, it's seems fair. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
ok so rosie got me back..lol i had a perfect run with this task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3193642_0, but I took a 8 point hit in granted credit vs claimed credit. That just sucks peanuts beyond belief! That is the worst credit grant differential I have had in a long time! |
ramostol Send message Joined: 6 Feb 07 Posts: 64 Credit: 584,052 RAC: 0 |
ramostol is actually having two issues. One with network connectivity, and the other with tasks completing with no finish line. And both happened to occur at the same time in the messages shown. Sorry for being late in responding. But I don't feel too certain that the case is this easy. 7-8 months ago I had not infrequently task failures with no finishing line, due to various unexplained causes. However, the last months this error has appeared very seldom, and practically all incidences (one unsolved exception) can be linked to the quality of the network connection. Mind you, this is not necessarily a fault caused by the Rosetta server, but seems most often to be connected to faulty wireless connection (Rosetta knowing the internet connection is activated but being unable to locate a server because the connection is fluctuating) influencing the task computing. I am no computer expert, but now I begin to feel that in my case the facts speak for themselves. |
M.L. Send message Joined: 21 Nov 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 180,462 RAC: 0 |
According to the BOINC MANAGER I have a 5.82 task waiting to run--- Task ID 138895008 Name CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3253661_0 Workunit 126479703 Created 6 Feb 2008 16:40:54 UTC Sent 6 Feb 2008 16:41:27 UTC Received --- Server state In Progress Outcome Unknown Client state New Exit status 0 (0x0) Computer ID 735230 Report deadline 16 Feb 2008 16:41:27 UTC CPU time 0 stderr out Validate state Initial Claimed credit 0 Granted credit 0 application version --- Is this correct? Not seen 5.82 for a long long time. |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
At any time, you can click "applications" on the Rosetta home page and see all of the application names and version that may be sending work. Yes, I haven't seen any for a while either, but 5.82 is still active. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
I have one as well, CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3260163_0 thought 5.82 was done doing any work. guess not. According to the BOINC MANAGER I have a 5.82 task waiting to run--- |
Thomas Leibold Send message Joined: 30 Jul 06 Posts: 55 Credit: 19,627,164 RAC: 0 |
Yesterday I had one of my systems (quad-core opteron) run all three types of applications at the same time: Rosetta 5.82, Rosetta Beta 5.93 and Mini Rosetta 1.07. Looks like they get along alright, because they all completed successfully. Team Helix |
P . P . L . Send message Joined: 20 Aug 06 Posts: 581 Credit: 4,865,274 RAC: 0 |
This task has errored twice now, someone might want to have a look at it. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=129474110 2/21/2008 1:33:06 PM|rosetta@home|Starting task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3281563_1 using rosetta version 582 2/21/2008 1:33:34 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3281563_1 finished 2/21/2008 1:33:34 PM|rosetta@home|Output file CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3281563_1_0 for task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3281563_1 absent pete. |
M.L. Send message Joined: 21 Nov 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 180,462 RAC: 0 |
Task ID 142014099 Name CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3279881_0 Workunit 129384114 Created 19 Feb 2008 13:55:02 UTC Sent 19 Feb 2008 13:55:16 UTC Received 23 Feb 2008 8:44:11 UTC Server state Over Outcome Client error Client state Compute error Exit status 1 (0x1) Computer ID 735230 Report deadline 29 Feb 2008 13:55:16 UTC CPU time 16 stderr out <core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 # random seed: -840 bad seed ERROR:: Exit from: .dock_structure.cc line: 429 </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Invalid Claimed credit 0.0660766997366262 Granted credit 0 application version 5.82 |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Task ID 142134125 Name CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3281974_0 Workunit 129495785 Created 20 Feb 2008 1:06:11 UTC Sent 20 Feb 2008 1:06:14 UTC Received 27 Feb 2008 18:31:53 UTC Server state Over Outcome Client error Client state Compute error Exit status 1 (0x1) Computer ID 293392 Report deadline 1 Mar 2008 1:06:14 UTC CPU time 21.59375 from BOINC Manager - 2/27/2008 4:51:55 PM|rosetta@home|Output file CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3281974_0_0 for task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1ubi_-_filters_1782_3281974_0 absent stderr out <core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 # random seed: -2933 bad seed ERROR:: Exit from: .dock_structure.cc line: 429 </stderr_txt> ]]> |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.82
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org