Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.81
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
bentjeans Send message Joined: 30 Oct 07 Posts: 1 Credit: 5,313 RAC: 0 |
My host seems to have run the 2257's the past day or so without incident. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/show_host_detail.php?hostid=656908 |
P . P . L . Send message Joined: 20 Aug 06 Posts: 581 Credit: 4,865,274 RAC: 0 |
This one ran well over my run time, even after i reduced it from 8hrs to 6hrs for faster turn round. It had run over the 8hr mark. 2fqm__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-2fqm_-crystal_foldanddock__2257_17546_0 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=107955094 pete. |
Jmarks Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 132 Credit: 98,025 RAC: 0 |
|
rochester new york Send message Joined: 2 Jul 06 Posts: 2842 Credit: 2,020,043 RAC: 0 |
could someone look at why i have all these errors ??????? |
Jmarks Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 132 Credit: 98,025 RAC: 0 |
|
rochester new york Send message Joined: 2 Jul 06 Posts: 2842 Credit: 2,020,043 RAC: 0 |
ok thanks ill try it....... |
MattDavis Send message Joined: 22 Sep 05 Posts: 206 Credit: 1,377,748 RAC: 0 |
This is just a heads up that tons of MFR_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX units are erroring out AFTER crunching for a full runtime, which is annoying. It also errored out for people who got the unit after mine errored out. Just a heads up! edit: This isn't just one computer of mine but many different computers, not to mention that other people errored when they got the same unit. So it's not just a faulty computer on my end! |
Matthias Lehmkuhl Send message Joined: 20 Nov 05 Posts: 12 Credit: 2,515,057 RAC: 1,353 |
I use Show Graphics in Boinc Manager on application version 5.81 and after an little time i closed the window. This causes an error of the Result with the following error message: <core_client_version>5.10.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code 1073807364 (0x40010004) </message> <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 10800 # random seed: 3802685 </stderr_txt> ]]> resultid=119553269 Matthias Matthias |
mhhall Send message Joined: 28 Mar 06 Posts: 7 Credit: 10,193,127 RAC: 0 |
1) I note that the "explain" item does not document what a "Compute Error" is.... 2) Work unit 106606679 1n0u__TREEJUMP_ABRELAX_NOTOR-1n0u_-_BARCODE__2241_1083 Appears to have failed on two different machines. Seems like 2nd time that this has happened to me recently... other job was WU 106970621: 2reb__TREEJUMP_ABRELAX_TOR_EQ_-5_PROB_.5_SAVE_ALL_OUT-2reb_-_BARCODE__2243_7638_0 This looks like a programming issue on both counts in same routine (ERROR:: Exit from: .pose.cc line: 769) Or, there is a issue with software running processes on my machine. |
Trey Send message Joined: 3 Oct 06 Posts: 11 Credit: 110,142 RAC: 0 |
I got a Client/Compute error for result 119600589. The workunit it is for, MFR_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX_GB1_mutant_2286_166, apparently failed previously for someone else, but with a Validate error instead. |
Marky-UK Send message Joined: 1 Nov 05 Posts: 73 Credit: 1,689,495 RAC: 0 |
This is just a heads up that tons of MFR_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX units are erroring out AFTER crunching for a full runtime, which is annoying. It also errored out for people who got the unit after mine errored out. I'd agree with that - I haven't had a single MFR_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX WU that's worked; they all fail with a -161 error after completion. |
Stevea Send message Joined: 19 Dec 05 Posts: 50 Credit: 738,655 RAC: 0 |
Here is one that errored out after 2 runs, neither received credit: MFR_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX_GB1_mutant_2286_18566 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=108650563 And for what it's worth, this is still one of the lowest granting projects, for time computed.... Might be time for a credit adjustment, I only crunch this now when other projects are down. Crunching this project for 2-5 times less credit than others is just unacceptable for a credit counter like me, trying to keep up with the other members of my team. Sorry but I cannot afford to buy 3-5 quads to crunch whatever I want, I have to pick and choose now. And to all you cross project parity people that IMO screwed this project up.... Have you figured out this is impossible........ just MO Will not be responding to the naysayers..JMO BETA = Bahhh Way too many errors, killing both the credit & RAC. And I still think the (New and Improved) credit system is not ready for prime time... |
Geoff Roynon Send message Joined: 4 Nov 05 Posts: 5 Credit: 960,686 RAC: 0 |
I'm still having intermittent problems with some work-units never completing. The latest is WU "2p64_BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX_2p64_-crystal_foldanddock_2257_389...". It has been sitting on CPU Time: 03:05:31 Progress: 94.885% for the last hour. I will abort it now. Geoff PPC Mac G5 dual 1.8GHz, 3GB Ram, Mac OSX 10.5 BOINC Manager 5.10.28 Rosetta Beta 5.81 |
Trey Send message Joined: 3 Oct 06 Posts: 11 Credit: 110,142 RAC: 0 |
Yep, I've had several MFR_SYMM_FOLD_DOCK_AND_RELAX errors. For example:
|
Stevea Send message Joined: 19 Dec 05 Posts: 50 Credit: 738,655 RAC: 0 |
Detaching now way tooooo many errors for 0 credit.....Get your act together. Every rig now has errors... https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=108626751 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=108637515 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=108635707 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=108622177 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=108641769 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=108632329 C'mon.... BETA = Bahhh Way too many errors, killing both the credit & RAC. And I still think the (New and Improved) credit system is not ready for prime time... |
David Emigh Send message Joined: 13 Mar 06 Posts: 158 Credit: 417,178 RAC: 0 |
This is just a heads up that tons of MFR_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX units are erroring out AFTER crunching for a full runtime {...} Add me to the list of those bit by the MFR_SYMM_FOLD etc. bug. WU 108617269 Rosie, Rosie, she's our gal, If she can't do it, no one shall! |
rochester new york Send message Joined: 2 Jul 06 Posts: 2842 Credit: 2,020,043 RAC: 0 |
im getting bummed out with all these errors :( |
BarryAZ Send message Joined: 27 Dec 05 Posts: 153 Credit: 30,845,917 RAC: 104 |
I looked for this thread after seeing a batch of computation errors on different workstations -- useful information (albeit all user to user and no Rosetta admin input here). Just went around and aborted all my MFR_SYMM_FOLD workunits (I found about 10 to 15 of them locally). Of course the downside is until there is admin awareness of the problems with this set of work units, they will simply get recycled. If someone can get the attention of the admin folks at Rosetta, perhaps they can purge the outgoing database so that these bad boys don't simply recycle in the user universe. This is just a heads up that tons of MFR_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX units are erroring out AFTER crunching for a full runtime {...} |
Jmarks Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 132 Credit: 98,025 RAC: 0 |
|
M.L. Send message Joined: 21 Nov 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 180,462 RAC: 0 |
13-Nov-2007 23:25:30 [rosetta@home] Computation for task MFR_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX_GB1_mutant_2286_7378_0 finished 13-Nov-2007 23:25:30 [rosetta@home] Output file MFR_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX_GB1_mutant_2286_7378_0_0 for task MFR_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX_GB1_mutant_2286_7378_0 absent This WU reported 13 Nov 23.44.32 as 'Validate Error' and resent to computer 596025 13 Nov 23.45.24. Wishes the new cruncher all the best!! |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.81
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org