Problems with Rosetta version 5.76

Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.76

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Rhiju
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 8 Jan 06
Posts: 223
Credit: 3,546
RAC: 0
Message 44913 - Posted: 12 Aug 2007, 20:53:03 UTC

Hi, this application is pretty similar to the previous one (5.73) -- thanks for continuing to post and reply to issues.
ID: 44913 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile kb7rzf
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 05
Posts: 16
Credit: 35,427
RAC: 0
Message 44974 - Posted: 14 Aug 2007, 22:11:52 UTC

Dunno if it matters, but running it, it says Rosetta Beta 5.76 LOL
ID: 44974 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Speedy
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Sep 05
Posts: 162
Credit: 703,854
RAC: 0
Message 44986 - Posted: 15 Aug 2007, 7:13:30 UTC - in response to Message 44974.  

I find it a litle confusing with the app saying 'Beta 5.76' since it been out since 12th/8
Have a crunching good day!!
ID: 44986 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 4875
Credit: 4,561,388
RAC: 3,272
Message 44988 - Posted: 15 Aug 2007, 8:37:23 UTC

is it a beta program or is it a finished version and they forgot to take beta out of the name?

this is the second "beta" program we have run now.
ID: 44988 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
transient
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Sep 06
Posts: 376
Credit: 10,836,395
RAC: 2,883
Message 44994 - Posted: 15 Aug 2007, 16:02:04 UTC

As I understand it 'beta' was put into the name to distinguish it from the other rosetta application. Apparently a version number is not enough of a difference.
ID: 44994 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 4875
Credit: 4,561,388
RAC: 3,272
Message 44997 - Posted: 15 Aug 2007, 17:49:48 UTC - in response to Message 44994.  

As I understand it 'beta' was put into the name to distinguish it from the other rosetta application. Apparently a version number is not enough of a difference.


well that would mean that it is not a finished version as such if it is a beta.
maybe mod.sense would care to comment or rhiju?
ID: 44997 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 45001 - Posted: 15 Aug 2007, 18:58:22 UTC

It's the version that has undergone testing on Ralph already. So it is "beta" in name only. I'm guessing we'll see a less confusing, but different name, once the 5.68 work is completed.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 45001 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Speedy
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Sep 05
Posts: 162
Credit: 703,854
RAC: 0
Message 45021 - Posted: 16 Aug 2007, 5:10:54 UTC - in response to Message 45001.  

It's the version that has undergone testing on Ralph already. So it is "beta" in name only. I'm guessing we'll see a less confusing, but different name, once the 5.68 work is completed.

Thanks for info. Any idea when the work with app 5.68 will be completated?
Have a crunching good day!!
ID: 45021 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
zoom314
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 May 07
Posts: 13
Credit: 118,553
RAC: 0
Message 45032 - Posted: 16 Aug 2007, 8:05:59 UTC

Yeah I was wondering why the app says Beta 5.76, Of course I'm running a 64bit version of Boinc 5.9.0 in XP x64 and the Beta app is a 32bit app too, A 64bit app would be nice of course.
Bad'OL MJSJ's PC Specs
ID: 45032 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
hugothehermit

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 05
Posts: 238
Credit: 314,893
RAC: 0
Message 45073 - Posted: 17 Aug 2007, 3:05:28 UTC

WU error Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)

This computer.

I haven't reported an error for so long that I forgotten if this is how to do it :)
ID: 45073 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
splodger

Send message
Joined: 15 Feb 06
Posts: 2
Credit: 658,187
RAC: 0
Message 45091 - Posted: 17 Aug 2007, 20:07:06 UTC

Hi!

My firewall (Zonealarm) has reported rosetta_beta_5.76_windows_intelx86.exe as trying to access the internet.

Why is it doing this?

Isn't reporting, etc. carried out by the BOINC application rather than the Rosetta .exe?

This may be a really stupid question! :)
ID: 45091 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
M.L.

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 06
Posts: 182
Credit: 180,462
RAC: 0
Message 45092 - Posted: 17 Aug 2007, 20:36:45 UTC
Last modified: 17 Aug 2007, 20:53:21 UTC

17/08/2007 19:46:18|rosetta@home|Starting LFAB__BOINC_TOP5CHEAT_JUMPRELAX_BARCODE-LFAB_-_1947_2281_0

Ran for 26 seconds only.
Is it worth trying to get a restart on this one? Or shall I abort?
{5.76}
ID: 45092 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 4875
Credit: 4,561,388
RAC: 3,272
Message 45095 - Posted: 17 Aug 2007, 20:56:32 UTC - in response to Message 45091.  

thats the install program for RAH Beta 5.76 that is the new RAH client.
Boinc is the application, but 5.76 also needs internet access to report and get work units. If there is something RAH or BOINC that needs to access the internet, let it.

Hi!

My firewall (Zonealarm) has reported rosetta_beta_5.76_windows_intelx86.exe as trying to access the internet.

Why is it doing this?

Isn't reporting, etc. carried out by the BOINC application rather than the Rosetta .exe?

This may be a really stupid question! :)


ID: 45095 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Stevea

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 05
Posts: 50
Credit: 738,655
RAC: 0
Message 45115 - Posted: 18 Aug 2007, 15:31:17 UTC
Last modified: 18 Aug 2007, 16:08:05 UTC

OK, this is starting to get annoying.

2 more results from a BETA release, 1 froze the rig the other has a validation error.

BETA 5.67

1st : cspA_BOINC_MFR_ABRELAX_CONTROL_1912_13731_0
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=100116577

Just how does this happen? And no credit! And It's done!

DONE :: 1 starting structures 13908.6 cpu seconds
This process generated 10449364 decoys from -542858906 attempts



2nd : LFAB__BOINC_TOP5CHEAT_JUMPRELAX_BARCODE-LFAB_-_1947_3886_1
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=100072160

Ran for 23 seconds, and froze the rig...waiting for permission to contact rosetta...this really needs to be removed, if it fails, move to the next one.

DO NOT freeze the whole rig up for overnight,waiting for permission, to run the debugger, COME ON.. You can name the app the same name and just overwrite it, one time permission setting!

Just name them all : rosetta_windows_intelx86.exe or a different name for Linux, and Mac.

You are changing apps so fast I cannot keep up with the permissions on my firewall. This really needs to be changed!!!

I really do have better things to do with my time than babysit computers for you!
BETA = Bahhh

Way too many errors, killing both the credit & RAC.

And I still think the (New and Improved) credit system is not ready for prime time...
ID: 45115 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile anders n

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 05
Posts: 403
Credit: 537,991
RAC: 0
Message 45123 - Posted: 18 Aug 2007, 17:11:39 UTC

This may be part of the problem.
"This process generated 10449364 decoys from -542858906 attempts"

Anders n
ID: 45123 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Stevea

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 05
Posts: 50
Credit: 738,655
RAC: 0
Message 45143 - Posted: 18 Aug 2007, 23:04:59 UTC - in response to Message 45123.  

This may be part of the problem.
"This process generated 10449364 decoys from -542858906 attempts"

Anders n


That IS what I was pointing out!

BETA = Bahhh

Way too many errors, killing both the credit & RAC.

And I still think the (New and Improved) credit system is not ready for prime time...
ID: 45143 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 4875
Credit: 4,561,388
RAC: 3,272
Message 45144 - Posted: 18 Aug 2007, 23:38:19 UTC - in response to Message 45143.  

This may be part of the problem.
"This process generated 10449364 decoys from -542858906 attempts"

Anders n


That IS what I was pointing out!


thats just the most absurd number of decoys and attempts i have ever seen.
ID: 45144 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Speedy
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Sep 05
Posts: 162
Credit: 703,854
RAC: 0
Message 45155 - Posted: 19 Aug 2007, 5:13:21 UTC - in response to Message 45144.  

This may be part of the problem.
"This process generated 10449364 decoys from -542858906 attempts"

Anders n


That IS what I was pointing out!


thats just the most absurd number of decoys and attempts i have ever seen.

Same here now long was the wu set to run for?
Have a crunching good day!!
ID: 45155 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Zander

Send message
Joined: 6 Aug 07
Posts: 1
Credit: 120,650
RAC: 0
Message 45162 - Posted: 19 Aug 2007, 12:06:40 UTC

Hi!

I have some troubles under RHEL3 and RHEL4:

$ boinc -return_results_immediately -allow_remote_gui_rpc
...
2007-08-19 14:20:34 [rosetta@home] [file_xfer] Started download of file boinc_description_file.txt
2007-08-19 14:20:36 [rosetta@home] [file_xfer] Finished download of file boinc_description_file.txt
2007-08-19 14:20:36 [rosetta@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 190 bytes/sec
2007-08-19 14:20:39 [rosetta@home] [file_xfer] Finished download of file boinc_mfr_aa3CSP_09_05.200_v1_3.gz
2007-08-19 14:20:39 [rosetta@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 107335 bytes/sec
2007-08-19 14:20:40 [rosetta@home] Starting cspA_200_BOINC_MFR_ABRELAX_PICKED_1987_1932_0
2007-08-19 14:20:40 [rosetta@home] Starting task cspA_200_BOINC_MFR_ABRELAX_PICKED_1987_1932_0 using rosetta_beta version 576
SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader

... and CPU is not used after that. What's wrong?
ID: 45162 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Jmarks
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 98,025
RAC: 0
Message 45165 - Posted: 19 Aug 2007, 12:13:29 UTC

I am not sure if you need to keep track of all 5.76 errors but it is better that I be safe than sorry.

99969790 90651802
99961264 90629952
100059579 90676390

Jmarks
ID: 45165 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.76



©2021 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org