I'm running the latest Boinc and Rosetta versions, but my tasks are stopping all the time. Also when I press Display Graphics, the task freezes, but the CPU keps running at 100%. I've re-installed Boinc manager a few times without fixing this. Can anyone offer help

---

RALPH and SETI are running fine now (I think). But there seems to be some trouble switching between two apps.

Fri Mar 30 19:22:34 2007|ralph@home|Starting 1hz6A_BOINC_NOFILTERS_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_NEWRELAXFLAGS_frags83__1881_9_0
Fri Mar 30 19:22:35 2007|ralph@home|Starting task 1hz6A_BOINC_NOFILTERS_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_NEWRELAXFLAGS_frags83__1881_9_0 using rosetta_beta version 557
Fri Mar 30 19:25:35 2007||Restarting 14dc03ab.15327.27825.1034670.3.138_0 - message timeout
Fri Mar 30 19:25:36 2007|SETI@home|Task 14dc03ab.15327.27825.1034670.3.138_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
Fri Mar 30 19:25:36 2007|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
Fri Mar 30 20:11:49 2007|ralph@home|Computation for task 1hz6A_BOINC_NOFILTERS_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_NEWRELAXFLAGS_frags83__1881_9_0 finished
Fri Mar 30 20:11:49 2007|SETI@home|Restarting task 14dc03ab.15327.27825.1034670.3.138_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 513
Fri Mar 30 20:11:51 2007|ralph@home|[file_xfer] Started upload of file 1hz6A_BOINC_NOFILTERS_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_NEWRELAXFLAGS_frags83__1881_9_0_0
Fri Mar 30 20:11:54 2007|ralph@home|[file_xfer] Finished upload of file 1hz6A_BOINC_NOFILTERS_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_NEWRELAXFLAGS_frags83__1881_9_0_0

Fri Mar 30 21:12:25 2007|ralph@home|Starting 2ztaA_BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK-2ztaA-nterm__1883_60_0
Fri Mar 30 21:12:26 2007|ralph@home|Starting task 2ztaA_BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK-2ztaA-nterm__1883_60_0 using rosetta_beta version 557
Fri Mar 30 22:13:35 2007|SETI@home|Resuming task 14dc03ab.15327.27825.1034670.3.138_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 513
Fri Mar 30 22:46:43 2007||Restarting 14dc03ab.15327.27825.1034670.3.138_0 - message timeout
Fri Mar 30 22:46:43 2007|SETI@home|Restarting task 14dc03ab.15327.27825.1034670.3.138_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 513
Fri Mar 30 22:46:44 2007||[error] Process 20701 not found

Activity Monitor said process 20701 was assigned to setiathome 5.13.
SETI is now assigned new process ID and running fine.

---

I've been gtting a lot of "access violation" and "illegal instruction" errors lately with 5.54. I don't use the graphics.

resultid=70385397
resultid=70335241
resultid=70108481
resultid=69679442
resultid=69560720

---

ralph (rosetta beta) 5.57 and 5.58 are running fine on my Mac.
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/results.php?userid=864
The graphics are running too. It's the first time I watch the graphics, so I can't tell you if what I see is correct or no. The pictures are changing. Boinc is not freezing. I can change the size of the window. Everything seems to be ok.

Like Sergio, I hope to see it soon on Rosetta.

Thank you Rhiju

---

Hi,

I'm not sure if it's here that I'm supposed to post this. The 1% thread that is active is a little hard to follow.

I've been constantly getting Computation Errors in Rosetta Version 5.54. I'm running Mac OS X 10.4.9. I rarely got these with the previous version of Rosetta.

The graphics have been running fine.

Hi,

I'm not sure if it's here that I'm supposed to post this. The 1% thread that is active is a little hard to follow.

I've been constantly getting Computation Errors in Rosetta Version 5.54. I'm running Mac OS X 10.4.9. I rarely got these with the previous version of Rosetta.

The graphics have been running fine.

Hold on there is a new app comming soon.

---

hi, i have the same problem (Process *** not found) on 3 Macs
iMac G5
MacBook Core Duo
iMac Core 2 Duo

sometimes goes and not...

i display correctly the graphics in any case...but the problem don't make me any process complete!

My problem is not any kind of errors, but with the steady drop in granted credit over the past two weeks along with a five month RAC of 225+ to 206.

I've heard that these even out. However, mine appears to be a steady consistant drop.

There have been code efficiency problems in the past, and I'm wondering if any inefficiencies exist in 5.5X.

We're looking into this. Keith, does your computer occasionally preempt Rosetta? Then one possible explanation: some of the new science modes that we're testing do not have frequent checkpointing (yet) -- this is our highest priority for the next update (the one after 5.59).

Can you post the answer over on the "Problems with Rosetta version 5.59" thread?

My problem is not any kind of errors, but with the steady drop in granted credit over the past two weeks along with a five month RAC of 225+ to 206.

I've heard that these even out. However, mine appears to be a steady consistant drop.

There have been code efficiency problems in the past, and I'm wondering if any inefficiencies exist in 5.5X.

---

with the latest version, for me the problem is solved!

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=70642330
Success Done 86,176.84
claimed credit 350.31 !!!!!!!
granted credit 390.51 ???????? why?

---

claimed credit 350.31
granted credit 390.51, why?

Rosetta credit is granted based on actual work completed. The credit claimed is based on the BOINC benchmarks. Your machine is crunching a little more efficiently then the benchmarks would have predicted, and so you were granted more credit.

[edit] I see you have a CORE2 CPU. I've noticed that they are almost always awarded significantly more credit then claimed. It just relates to crunching done by the benchmarks are compared to what is actually done in Rosetta. This is part of why Rosetta moved to this credit based on work compelted system for granting credit.

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

rrrrrrrr
but to day https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=70735784
86,477.50
365.09
614.97 !!!!!

and why BOINC benchmark has different results
my best 34xx71xx
but some times 33xx45xx and only after second RUN of benchmark takes my best results ?

---