Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.43
Author | Message |
---|---|
Rhiju Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 8 Jan 06 Posts: 223 Credit: 3,546 RAC: 0 |
Please post problems with Rosetta@home 5.43 here. We're especially interested in whether graphics-related crashes are reduced with this version. In January, we'll be trying updates with some of the graphics features revived, and with some new modes of Rosetta. So your feedback over the next few weeks is important to us, if you can spare the time! |
FluffyChicken Send message Joined: 1 Nov 05 Posts: 1260 Credit: 369,635 RAC: 0 |
|
Philip Send message Joined: 23 Oct 06 Posts: 6 Credit: 89,430 RAC: 0 |
Yes, I clicked and dragged on the graphics screen and it instantly crashed. The affected job was stopped and listed as a computation error in the client. I've never tried clicking and dragging before on previous versions - wasn't aware that mouse rotation was possible. So I can't say whether this might have worked for me in previous versions. But it's certainly broken in 5.43. |
Rhiju Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 8 Jan 06 Posts: 223 Credit: 3,546 RAC: 0 |
Whoa, that's a bummer. Amazing, Philip, your computer has a perfect success rate previous to this crash! If you see further crashes (without clicking/dragging), please let us know. Its going to take a couple days before the 5.43 WUs really become widespread; many users probably are going through their cache of 5.41 WUs still. We're crossing our fingers ... things looked very good on ralph. [There was a posting there of a computer that also crashed when two graphics windows were opened, on a multicore machine; I wonder if the problem is just with the "show graphics" window.] Yes, I clicked and dragged on the graphics screen and it instantly crashed. The affected job was stopped and listed as a computation error in the client. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Just installed 5.43 and tried dragging the graphics screen all around, unable to reproduce this problem. Can drag it all over my screen and enlarge and shrink to any size and it keeps on chugging away. Whoa, that's a bummer. Amazing, Philip, your computer has a perfect success rate previous to this crash! If you see further crashes (without clicking/dragging), please let us know. |
SAHBster Send message Joined: 24 Aug 06 Posts: 1 Credit: 27,266 RAC: 0 |
Just had to detach from the project, tried to reschedule but no luck. 3 of the last 5 WU's froze apparently due to graphics, now the project is telling me I do not have enough space for new WU's Attached is list of messages received to see if this is of any assistance to developers. 15/12/2006 09:18:46|rosetta@home|Resuming task s018__BOINC_LOOP_RELAX_IGNORE_THE_REST_hom001__IGNORE_THE_REST_mapback_hom009_S_00002_0004955_0_1446_133_0 using rosetta version 543 15/12/2006 12:02:29|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi 15/12/2006 12:02:29|rosetta@home|Reason: To fetch work 15/12/2006 12:02:29|rosetta@home|Requesting 3150 seconds of new work 15/12/2006 12:02:33|rosetta@home|Scheduler request succeeded 15/12/2006 12:02:33|rosetta@home|Message from server: No work sent 15/12/2006 12:02:33|rosetta@home|Message from server: (there was work but you don't have enough disk space allocated) 15/12/2006 12:02:33|rosetta@home|Message from server: BOINC will delete file jump_templates_v2.dat.gz when no longer needed 15/12/2006 12:02:33|rosetta@home|Got server request to delete file jump_templates_v2.dat.gz 15/12/2006 12:02:33|rosetta@home|No work from project 15/12/2006 13:59:15||Rescheduling CPU: application exited 15/12/2006 13:59:15|rosetta@home|Computation for task s018__BOINC_LOOP_RELAX_IGNORE_THE_REST_hom001__IGNORE_THE_REST_mapback_hom009_S_00002_0004955_0_1446_133_0 finished 15/12/2006 13:59:17|rosetta@home|Started upload of file s018__BOINC_LOOP_RELAX_IGNORE_THE_REST_hom001__IGNORE_THE_REST_mapback_hom009_S_00002_0004955_0_1446_133_0_0 15/12/2006 13:59:23|rosetta@home|Finished upload of file s018__BOINC_LOOP_RELAX_IGNORE_THE_REST_hom001__IGNORE_THE_REST_mapback_hom009_S_00002_0004955_0_1446_133_0_0 15/12/2006 13:59:23|rosetta@home|Throughput 18793 bytes/sec 15/12/2006 16:02:35|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi 15/12/2006 16:02:35|rosetta@home|Reason: To fetch work 15/12/2006 16:02:35|rosetta@home|Requesting 21600 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 completed tasks 15/12/2006 16:02:40|rosetta@home|Scheduler request succeeded 15/12/2006 16:02:40|rosetta@home|Message from server: No work sent 15/12/2006 16:02:40|rosetta@home|Message from server: (there was work but you don't have enough disk space allocated) 15/12/2006 16:02:40|rosetta@home|Message from server: BOINC will delete file SASA-masks.dat.gz when no longer needed 15/12/2006 16:02:40|rosetta@home|Got server request to delete file SASA-masks.dat.gz 15/12/2006 16:02:40|rosetta@home|No work from project 15/12/2006 16:34:07|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi 15/12/2006 16:34:07|rosetta@home|Reason: Requested by user 15/12/2006 16:34:07|rosetta@home|Requesting 21600 seconds of new work 15/12/2006 16:34:12|rosetta@home|Scheduler request succeeded 15/12/2006 16:34:12|rosetta@home|Message from server: No work sent 15/12/2006 16:34:12|rosetta@home|Message from server: (there was work but you don't have enough disk space allocated) 15/12/2006 16:34:12|rosetta@home|Message from server: BOINC will delete file Paa.gz when no longer needed 15/12/2006 16:34:12|rosetta@home|Got server request to delete file Paa.gz 15/12/2006 16:37:06||Rescheduling CPU: project reset by user 15/12/2006 16:37:06|rosetta@home|Resetting project 15/12/2006 16:37:06||Rescheduling CPU: exit_tasks 15/12/2006 16:41:19|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi 15/12/2006 16:41:19|rosetta@home|Reason: Requested by user 15/12/2006 16:41:19|rosetta@home|Requesting 21600 seconds of new work 15/12/2006 16:41:24|rosetta@home|Scheduler request succeeded 15/12/2006 16:41:24|rosetta@home|Message from server: No work sent 15/12/2006 16:41:24|rosetta@home|Message from server: (there was work but you don't have enough disk space allocated) 15/12/2006 16:41:24|rosetta@home|Message from server: BOINC will delete file Paa_n.gz when no longer needed 15/12/2006 16:41:24|rosetta@home|Got server request to delete file Paa_n.gz 15/12/2006 16:41:38|rosetta@home|Resetting project 15/12/2006 16:41:38||Rescheduling CPU: exit_tasks 15/12/2006 16:41:38|rosetta@home|Detaching from project 15/12/2006 16:41:38||Rescheduling CPU: project detached by user |
Rene Send message Joined: 2 Dec 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 67,269 RAC: 0 |
Just re-attached my linux host and all 5.43 wu's went wrong. Some even froze up the manager, others just had a compute error. Manager 5.7.5 Linux Some massages: <core_client_version>5.7.5</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Maximum memory exceeded </message> ]]> <core_client_version>5.7.5</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Maximum memory exceeded </message> <stderr_txt> Graphics are disabled due to configuration... # random seed: 2307412 SIGSEGV: segmentation violation Stack trace (20 frames): [0x8ab6403] [0x8ace4bc] [0xffffe420] [0x88dac6f] [0x88dfec3] [0x8955e10] [0x8958733] [0x86d29a8] [0x86d9781] [0x86daf13] [0x842fc1b] [0x84305ba] [0x88bd312] [0x88c0117] [0x80dc90d] [0x84d61db] [0x85eb303] [0x85eb3ac] [0x8b2d9d4] [0x8048111] Exiting... </stderr_txt> ]]> ;-) |
FluffyChicken Send message Joined: 1 Nov 05 Posts: 1260 Credit: 369,635 RAC: 0 |
Looks like the new memory managment is kicking in on your computer Rene. afaik it is doing as it should, you would need to ask in the BOINC forums about this though. Don't know why the segfaults happened though. Team mauisun.org |
Chu Send message Joined: 23 Feb 06 Posts: 120 Credit: 112,439 RAC: 0 |
Could you please give a try to re-attach the project and see if the problem gets cleared out. I don't know exactly why this happens, but it looks like there was a mis-communication between your boinc mananger and our project server because the queue has been very full recently and most of them do not have special memory requirements, so it is strange to get message "no work" from the server and I am sure "not enough disk space" is one of the strange side effects from that mis-communication. Also, I noticed that all the three crashed jobs were running under 5.41 which has been known to have some graphic problems. But with new updated 5.43, the problem seems to be alleviated a lot according to the tests and reports so far. Thanks for your help and let us know if the problem gets solved.
|
Rene Send message Joined: 2 Dec 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 67,269 RAC: 0 |
Looks like the new memory managment is kicking in on your computer Rene. Keeping that in mind, I did re-attach with the following settings: Use at most 90% of memory when computer is in use Use at most 90% of memory when computer is idle Default: Use at most 50% of memory when computer is in use Use at most 90% of memory when computer is idle Just tried one with 100%-100% and this also failed. <core_client_version>5.7.5</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Maximum memory exceeded </message> <stderr_txt> Graphics are disabled due to configuration... # random seed: 2255689 SIGSEGV: segmentation violation Stack trace (20 frames): [0x8ab6403] [0x8ace4bc] [0xffffe420] [0x88dac6f] [0x88dfec3] [0x8955e10] [0x8958733] [0x86d29a8] [0x86d9781] [0x86daf13] [0x842fc1b] [0x84305ba] [0x88bd312] [0x88c0117] [0x80dc90d] [0x84d61db] [0x85eb303] [0x85eb3ac] [0x8b2d9d4] [0x8048111] Exiting... SIGSEGV: segmentation violation SIGABRT: abort called SIGABRT: abort called SIGABRT: abort called SIGABRT: abort called SIGABRT: abort called ...... (lots more) SIGABRT: abort called SIGABRT: abort called SIGABRT: abort called SIGABRT: abort called </stderr_txt> ]]> Maybe it's because of the 256Mb memory of the host..? ;-) EDIT: Just checked the running processes and saw that 5.43 was using 17.4 Mb. To compare: Seti 63.4 Mb and Docking 23.2 Mb. Both Seti and Docking are running OK. |
Rene Send message Joined: 2 Dec 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 67,269 RAC: 0 |
No problems (so far) with this host. Pentium D 805 (windows) 1Gb memory is running 2 wu's at this moment and I can open, drag, click... both graphics screens at once. VGA: Ati Radeon 9200 SE AGP 128Mb ;-) |
Philip Send message Joined: 23 Oct 06 Posts: 6 Credit: 89,430 RAC: 0 |
Just installed 5.43 and tried dragging the graphics screen all around, unable to reproduce this problem. Can drag it all over my screen and enlarge and shrink to any size and it keeps on chugging away. Oops - maybe I wasn't clear enough. No, dragging or resizing the window is NOT a problem. What crashed it, was clicking and dragging INSIDE the graphics window. To be precise, I clicked somewhere on the picture of the backbone structure inside the "ACCEPTED" box, and attempted to manipulate or rotate it by dragging to another point inside the graphics window (I think my release point may have ben outside of the "ACCEPTED" box though). As soon as I released the mouse button, the window graphics window crashed, with the usual "would you like to send a report to Microsoft", etc. |
Chu Send message Joined: 23 Feb 06 Posts: 120 Credit: 112,439 RAC: 0 |
The mouse zooming and rotating features have been disabled in 5.43 and I don't think you can do any mouse manipulation on the graphic now. I just tried what you did on our windows computer and nothing happened as expected. Were you able to rotate the protein in any of the graphic boxes when the crash occured? Were you running 5.43 then? Just installed 5.43 and tried dragging the graphics screen all around, unable to reproduce this problem. Can drag it all over my screen and enlarge and shrink to any size and it keeps on chugging away. |
Philip Send message Joined: 23 Oct 06 Posts: 6 Credit: 89,430 RAC: 0 |
The mouse zooming and rotating features have been disabled in 5.43 and I don't think you can do any mouse manipulation on the graphic now. I just tried what you did on our windows computer and nothing happened as expected. Were you able to rotate the protein in any of the graphic boxes when the crash occured? Were you running 5.43 then? No, indeed the protein didn't rotate. I didn't see any on screen response to the click and drag other than the crash at the end of it. Perhaps something to do with my specific graphics config? Don't know if the following is helpful, but here's some dxdiag.exe output for my display device: ------------------ System Information ------------------ Time of this report: 12/16/2006, 01:03:37 Operating System: Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 2 (2600.xpsp.050928-1517) Language: English (Regional Setting: English) System Manufacturer: TOSHIBA System Model: Satellite M105 BIOS: Ver 1.00PARTTBL0 Processor: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz (2 CPUs) Memory: 1014MB RAM Page File: 1312MB used, 1131MB available Windows Dir: C:WINDOWS DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904) DX Setup Parameters: Not found DxDiag Version: 5.03.2600.2180 32bit Unicode --------------- Display Devices --------------- Card name: Mobile Intel(R) 945GM Express Chipset Family Manufacturer: Intel Corporation Chip type: Intel(R) Calistoga Graphics Controller DAC type: Internal Device Key: EnumPCIVEN_8086&DEV_27A2&SUBSYS_FF001179&REV_03 Display Memory: 128.0 MB Current Mode: 1280 x 800 (32 bit) (60Hz) Monitor: Plug and Play Monitor Monitor Max Res: 1600,1200 Driver Name: ialmrnt5.dll Driver Version: 6.14.0010.4436 (English) DDI Version: 9 (or higher) Driver Attributes: Final Retail Driver Date/Size: 11/28/2005 22:12:08, 36990 bytes WHQL Logo'd: Yes WHQL Date Stamp: n/a VDD: n/a Mini VDD: ialmnt5.sys Mini VDD Date: 11/28/2005 22:20:20, 1353820 bytes Device Identifier: {D7B78E66-64E2-11CF-9D63-0ADFA2C2CB35} Vendor ID: 0x8086 Device ID: 0x27A2 SubSys ID: 0xFF001179 Revision ID: 0x0003 Revision ID: 0x0003 Video Accel: Deinterlace Caps: n/a Registry: OK DDraw Status: Enabled D3D Status: Enabled AGP Status: Not Available DDraw Test Result: Not run D3D7 Test Result: Not run D3D8 Test Result: Not run D3D9 Test Result: Not run |
Philip Send message Joined: 23 Oct 06 Posts: 6 Credit: 89,430 RAC: 0 |
Were you running 5.43 then? Sorry, forgot to add - Yes, I was definitely running 5.43 at the time. |
FluffyChicken Send message Joined: 1 Nov 05 Posts: 1260 Credit: 369,635 RAC: 0 |
Philip, The integrated Intel (945) has been listed before when graphics problems happen. Is that using the trackpad, nipple or a mouse ? First try the newer graphics drivers, I think there are a lot of improvments in them Intel 945GM series drivers for WinXP P.S. Have you check to see if your battery is one of the recall (exploding Sony) ones. That laptop is on the risk list. Team mauisun.org |
Gen_X_Accord Send message Joined: 5 Jun 06 Posts: 154 Credit: 279,018 RAC: 0 |
I didn't even know about the mouse moves to the proteins in the graphics until I read that they were going bye-bye. Bummer. My granted credit is really low with this new version and its associated work units. It's killing my RAC. |
daniels Send message Joined: 3 Jul 06 Posts: 7 Credit: 13,439 RAC: 0 |
just for test, i have setup that setting for 2 hours and after it reached that period it just stop doing something, like the last time and get 70% done... i will increase the period to 4 hours, to have the task completed... but i think this is not a solution... the watch dog is not restarting the application, it just keep it in memory while it is not doing nothing... the other applications are working properly... i think someone should verify this... i am not using graphics also... |
googloo Send message Joined: 15 Sep 06 Posts: 133 Credit: 22,813,645 RAC: 1,448 |
12/15/2006 12:10:20 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result BAK_1avs_TnC_loop_model_1438_14802_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) 12/15/2006 7:53:42 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result BAK_1avs_TnC_loop_model_1438_22549_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) I am certain the screen was "blank" the second time. I am not sure about the first. Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.40GHz Memory: 2.00 GB physical, 3.85 GB virtual Disk: 222.65 GB total, 178.13 GB free Windows XP Home |
googloo Send message Joined: 15 Sep 06 Posts: 133 Credit: 22,813,645 RAC: 1,448 |
12/16/2006 7:28:50 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result BAK_1avs_TnC_loop_model_1438_31605_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.43
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org