Message boards : Number crunching : CPU Time not accurate?
Previous · 1 · 2
| Author | Message | 
|---|---|
| 
        
     Soren Hedberg Send message Joined: 30 Oct 06 Posts: 25 Credit: 3,653 RAC: 0  | 
        
         
 Hi Soren, Yes, it's set like that.     
 | 
| 
        
     Soren Hedberg Send message Joined: 30 Oct 06 Posts: 25 Credit: 3,653 RAC: 0  | 
        
         
 Rebooted, now it's working right.     
 | 
        
       Buffalo BillSend message Joined: 25 Mar 06 Posts: 71 Credit: 1,630,458 RAC: 0  | 
        
         
 Sometimes they just need a good swift kick ;)  | 
        
       River~~Send message Joined: 15 Dec 05 Posts: 761 Credit: 285,578 RAC: 0  | 
        
         
 Looks like most of your results are showing the same file access error on your stderr out: I think I have seen this error when I have managed to get two copies of BOINC running together. This mistake is easier to make on Linux, but I have seen it on Windows. One more thing - if you are looking in task manager for the BOINC cpu time, it should not increase a lot, as task manager shows time separately for BOINC (ie the core client) and for Rosetta. It should be one of the Rosetta threads that is taking up 99% or more of the cpu time, not a task called BOINC at all. On Linux the same is true of top and ps aux. Don't know if either point helps - but wish you luck sorting it out. River~~   
 | 
            Message boards : 
            Number crunching : 
        CPU Time not accurate?
    
         ©2025 University of Washington 
https://www.bakerlab.org