Message boards : Number crunching : credit/hour how much is possible??
Author | Message |
---|---|
_heinz Send message Joined: 30 Jun 06 Posts: 24 Credit: 38,697 RAC: 0 |
how much you get in one hour, please report here ------------------------------------------------ I looked at my last 45 results summary cpu time= 446576,16 sec these are 124,0489333 hours granted credit summary:1248,89 credit/hour=1248,89/124,04 credit/hour=10,06 max credit/day=240 ----------------- P4 2,66GHz, WinXP |
Bird-Dog Send message Joined: 15 Dec 05 Posts: 42 Credit: 116,749 RAC: 0 |
10 wu`s 28549.67 secs (1hr pref) Credit granted 62.12 Credit/hr 7.833 Athlon XP 2400+ WinXP pro SP2 |
Astro Send message Joined: 2 Oct 05 Posts: 987 Credit: 500,253 RAC: 0 |
Celeron 500, 256Mram, 2.04 cr/hour P4 1.8 northwood, 512Mram, 6.34 cr/hour AMD64 2800+ clawhammer, 512Mram, 10.76 cr/hour AMD64, Mobile 3700 (754 socket), 1Mram, 13.93 cr/hour AMD64 3700 Sandiego, 1Mram, OC'ed 10%, 15.98 cr/hour |
Buffalo Bill Send message Joined: 25 Mar 06 Posts: 71 Credit: 1,630,458 RAC: 0 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+ 2GB RAM - 15.7*2 = 31.4/hr Intel Celeron 2.93GHz 1GB RAM - 10.9/hr x86 Family 6 Model 8 Stepping 3 600MHz 192MB RAM (Win 98 SE) - 3.3/hr |
casio7131 Send message Joined: 10 Oct 05 Posts: 35 Credit: 149,748 RAC: 0 |
dual p3/933 (768 mb ram) 20 wu (x10 h), cpu = 685818, granted = 922 cred/h = 9.68 = 2 x 4.84 athlon 1200 (1 gb ram) 16 wu (x10 h), cpu = 535756, granted = 798 cred/h = 5.36 athlon 2700+ (1 gb ram) 11 wu (x10 h), cpu = 391195, granted = 1228 cred/h = 11.31 |
Ethan Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 05 Posts: 286 Credit: 9,304,700 RAC: 0 |
Athlon x2 4200 overclocked to 2.5ghz 2gb ram = 16.16 credits/hour per cpu Intel Core Duo 1.66ghz 1gb ram = 12.65 credits/hour per cpu Intel Celeron 2ghz 256mb ram = 6.05 credits/hour Intel P4 1.5ghz 512mb ram = 5.5 credits/hour |
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 11 Feb 06 Posts: 316 Credit: 6,621,003 RAC: 0 |
how much you get in one hour, please report here This is my set of crunchers. I combined the latest 5 results, and took the average just to smooth things out. But a larger sample is needed, as credits granted can vary greatly. That is a long way to say the numbers could be off by 10-20% in either direction. The Athlon X2 number is wrong. Turns out it was frequency throttled. Now that I fixed it, the numbers are about double. Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA |
Housing and Food Services Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 85 Credit: 155,098,531 RAC: 0 |
Intel P4 3.2ghz 1gb ram = 7.72 c/h Intel P4 1.7ghz 512mb ram = 5.93 c/h Intel P3 733mhz 256mb ram = 3.97 c/h Intel D 2.8ghz dual core 1gb ram = 11.72 c/h per core |
Hoelder1in Send message Joined: 30 Sep 05 Posts: 169 Credit: 3,915,947 RAC: 0 |
Core 2 Duo E6700 @ 2.8 GHz: 23.75 c/h per core (47.5 c/h total) - got mine last weekend :-) Intel P4 3.2 GHz HT: 7.5 c/h per thread (15 c/h total) Intel P3 1.0GHz 256 kB cache, 384 MB ram: 3.75 c/h Team betterhumans.com - discuss and celebrate the future - hoelder1in.org |
STE\/E Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 125 Credit: 4,099,627 RAC: 936 |
Core 2 Duo E6700 @ 2.8 GHz: 23.75 c/h per core (47.5 c/h total) - got mine last weekend :-) Drool ... ;) ... I can't wait to get my hands on mine, I've got the X6800 Extreme Edition coming. I know it's way over priced but every once in awhile I have a Brain Fart and splurge ... :) Are you running yours at the Stock Rated Speed or have you Overclocked it, I'm going to try and get the X6800 up over 3.4Ghz. Any where between 3.4 & 3.5 will be just fine. |
Hoelder1in Send message Joined: 30 Sep 05 Posts: 169 Credit: 3,915,947 RAC: 0 |
Are you running yours at the Stock Rated Speed or have you Overclocked itIt is only 5 % overclocked (to 2.8 GHz) - the board I am using is not designed for overclocking and I want it to be rock-bottom stable. I'm still playing with the BIOS settings to squeeze some more speed out of it... ;-) Team betterhumans.com - discuss and celebrate the future - hoelder1in.org |
STE\/E Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 125 Credit: 4,099,627 RAC: 936 |
It is only 5 % overclocked (to 2.8 GHz) - the board I am using is not designed for overclocking and I want it to be rock-bottom stable. I'm still playing with the BIOS settings to squeeze some more speed out of it... ;-) I noticed that when I checked your Computers & realized it was OC'ed a little bit. Stability is the the main reason I went with the X6800 EE, if I don't want to overclock it I don't have to & it will be plenty fast as is is. The Motherboard I'm getting is quite versatile for Overclocking & the CPU will have a Mini Liquid Cooling System so I should be able to bump it up & still retain Stability ... :) |
Ricardo Send message Joined: 9 Dec 05 Posts: 26 Credit: 24,039 RAC: 0 |
P4 @2.4 Ghz, Memory 512 MB, MFPS: 1225.11, MIS: 2358.67, WIN XP Credit/Hour: 8.06 - 10.32 (Different WU) Celeron D @ 2.66 Ghz, Memory 256 MB, MFPS: 1318.08, MIS: 2173.58, WIN XP Credit/Hour: 9.35 - 10.48 (Different WU) |
Mats Petersson Send message Joined: 29 Sep 05 Posts: 225 Credit: 951,788 RAC: 0 |
An Opteron dual core running at 2.6GHz (Opteron 2218) gets an average of 18.1 credits per hour, with a range of 13.4-22.5, that's over 26 work units processed between 25th and 31st of August. The granted credit for the said workunits is on average 2.4 times the claimed value, range 1.8-3.1. This machine is running Linux. Another linux machine, this one with 4x Opteron 840 is getting 9.3 credits per hour, which is 2.1 times the claimed value. Number of workunits: 9. In comparison, my Windows machine with an Athlon64 3400+ (only two workunits in the database) is getting around 14.3 credits per hour, and 1.1 times the claimed credit. -- Mats |
Gen_X_Accord Send message Joined: 5 Jun 06 Posts: 154 Credit: 279,018 RAC: 0 |
AMD Athalon XP 2400+ (2.0 GHZ) 768 MB DDR 2100 Windows XP Home My WU time is set to 10 hours Without typing all of the info, 90.34 hours and credits and stuff, I am getting 8.185 credits/hour |
[AF>Linux]Arnaud Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 38 Credit: 10,490 RAC: 0 |
P4 3Ghz HT Linux: 7.87 credits/hour/thread (~twice the claimed credits) Arnaud |
Bird-Dog Send message Joined: 15 Dec 05 Posts: 42 Credit: 116,749 RAC: 0 |
AMD Athalon XP 2400+ (2.0 GHZ) You seem to be doing better than me with the same system although you have more RAM and longer wu pref. Do either af these make any differance. |
Mats Petersson Send message Joined: 29 Sep 05 Posts: 225 Credit: 951,788 RAC: 0 |
AMD Athalon XP 2400+ (2.0 GHZ) In theory no difference between short and long run-time. But bear in mind that differences in memory types (slower or faster timings) as well as many other factors may matter here: - Network packages may take a small amount of cpu-time. - Incoming e-mails being scanned for viruses etc. Each workunit will take about a minute to start up, but as long as you don't have 1 hour per work-unit it shouldn't make a whole lot of difference. -- Mats |
miw Send message Joined: 20 Aug 06 Posts: 9 Credit: 1,037,281 RAC: 0 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800, O/C to 2.58GHz (7.5% O/C) 2GB Ram (clocked at CL2.5) Windows XP 32.69 Credits/Hr (Most recent 10 results) hostid=288946 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400, Stock Clock (2.2GHz) 1GB RAM (forget what type, think it's CL3) Linux (SUSE 10.1 SMP) 28.92 Credits/Hr (most recent 12 results) hostid=288952 --miw --miw |
Christoph Jansen Send message Joined: 6 Jun 06 Posts: 248 Credit: 267,153 RAC: 0 |
You seem to be doing better than me with the same system although you have more RAM and longer wu pref. Do either af these make any differance. Bird-Dog, you are running WUs for 1 hour which gives you a lot of overhead for initialization especially on WUs with bigger proteins. Longer runtimes will surely increase your output if you have your PC on for several hours. However, if you only have it on shorter then initialization will take place each time you start up the machine and will cost time. Longer runtimes per WU will only help you little in that case. But they will save you online time/volume. --Christoph |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit/hour how much is possible??
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org