Report work units with unusual amount of credits granted

Message boards : Number crunching : Report work units with unusual amount of credits granted

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
BennyRop

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 05
Posts: 555
Credit: 140,800
RAC: 0
Message 25153 - Posted: 27 Aug 2006, 17:42:21 UTC



Ananas:
I was graphing the new credits as credit/second like the pic above and then reporting the wildly unusual new credit grants. When graphing granted credit along with the claimed credit, it was also possible to see the effect of benchmarking/rebooting and unloading unneccessary software. The value I quoted is my subjective call on how much higher (or lower in one case) than the eyeballed average for that area of the chart.
In the chart above, only 2 of the WUs were reported.




ID: 25153 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
tralala

Send message
Joined: 8 Apr 06
Posts: 376
Credit: 581,806
RAC: 0
Message 25938 - Posted: 3 Sep 2006, 9:51:21 UTC
Last modified: 3 Sep 2006, 9:54:05 UTC

I just processed two t354__CASP7_MINHELIX WU. One was reported back 2 Sep 2006 19:49:46 UTC and got 2.88 credits/decoy, the other was reported back 3 Sep 2006 4:55:42 UTC and got 2.45 credits/decoy. I find this a surprisingly high deviation for a WU, which is older than 24 hours.

It appears to me that there is a trend for all WU, that they get less and less credit the "older" they are. This could be explained by the fact, that 5.5.0 reports results back immediately, after they are finished while the stock client reports them back later. So the first reported results are probably most from 5.5.0 clients and are corrected the more standard clients report back. Can anyone confirm my hypothesis with his results?
ID: 25938 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Astro
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Oct 05
Posts: 987
Credit: 500,253
RAC: 0
Message 25941 - Posted: 3 Sep 2006, 11:48:21 UTC - in response to Message 25938.  

I just processed two t354__CASP7_MINHELIX WU. [snip] I find this a surprisingly high deviation for a WU, which is older than 24 hours.

It appears to me that there is a trend for all WU, that they get less and less credit the "older" they are. This could be explained by the fact, that 5.5.0 reports results back immediately, after they are finished while the stock client reports them back later. So the first reported results are probably most from 5.5.0 clients and are corrected the more standard clients report back. Can anyone confirm my hypothesis with his results?

Perhaps you were part of the "bonus group"?? The last, 3rd from last, and 5th from last wus on this chart are from the same type wu.

ID: 25941 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Vester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Nov 05
Posts: 258
Credit: 3,651,260
RAC: 428
Message 25944 - Posted: 3 Sep 2006, 12:35:31 UTC
Last modified: 3 Sep 2006, 12:38:11 UTC

ID: 25944 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : Report work units with unusual amount of credits granted



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org