Rosetta Beta 6.00

Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta Beta 6.00

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 5 · 6 · 7 · 8

AuthorMessage
speedenbull

Send message
Joined: 27 May 12
Posts: 2
Credit: 427,181
RAC: 846
Message 112017 - Posted: 3 Feb 2025, 20:03:43 UTC - in response to Message 111977.  

I am getting about a 14% error rate on new beta WUs .
ID: 112017 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sid Celery

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 08
Posts: 2214
Credit: 42,212,638
RAC: 22,870
Message 112019 - Posted: 4 Feb 2025, 0:07:36 UTC - in response to Message 112017.  

I am getting about a 14% error rate on new beta WUs .

I'm not doing any better. I might doing worse tbh.
ID: 112019 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Old man

Send message
Joined: 10 Nov 07
Posts: 26
Credit: 1,285,950
RAC: 8,218
Message 112093 - Posted: 16 Feb 2025, 14:21:14 UTC - in response to Message 112019.  

So then I'm lucky to have a higher percentage of tasks complete succsesfully.

I'm just wondering the same thing as everyone else on the forum.
Why are we not informed of the status of these beta tasks?

Why is this Rosetta@home used to test the beta phase tasks? I understand that ralph is only for alpha phase testing.
Why isn't anyone told what new features 6.06 offers compared to previous versions? And why is this 6.06 version months old? After the beta phase? Is there any timeline, or number of approved tasks, after which this becomes a production version?
ID: 112093 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sid Celery

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 08
Posts: 2214
Credit: 42,212,638
RAC: 22,870
Message 112094 - Posted: 16 Feb 2025, 20:54:03 UTC - in response to Message 112093.  

So then I'm lucky to have a higher percentage of tasks complete successfully.

I don't think so.
I think the previous batch of 2.5m allowed parameters outside of a range it could process
And, I assume in reaction, the current batch of 2.2m hasn't produced a single error of that type for any in my team

I'm just wondering the same thing as everyone else on the forum

I've been here a long time and I'm not wondering any of these things tbh.
Sometimes they do detail capabilities of new versions to us, but it's their business far more than ours, so I don't mind if they don't. I trust them.

We're here to provide process capacity - we can either do that or not
ID: 112094 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 5 · 6 · 7 · 8

Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta Beta 6.00



©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org