Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta Beta 6.00
Previous · 1 . . . 5 · 6 · 7 · 8
Author | Message |
---|---|
speedenbull Send message Joined: 27 May 12 Posts: 2 Credit: 427,181 RAC: 846 |
I am getting about a 14% error rate on new beta WUs . |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2214 Credit: 42,212,638 RAC: 22,870 ![]() |
I am getting about a 14% error rate on new beta WUs . I'm not doing any better. I might doing worse tbh. ![]() ![]() |
Old man Send message Joined: 10 Nov 07 Posts: 26 Credit: 1,285,950 RAC: 8,218 ![]() |
So then I'm lucky to have a higher percentage of tasks complete succsesfully. I'm just wondering the same thing as everyone else on the forum. Why are we not informed of the status of these beta tasks? Why is this Rosetta@home used to test the beta phase tasks? I understand that ralph is only for alpha phase testing. Why isn't anyone told what new features 6.06 offers compared to previous versions? And why is this 6.06 version months old? After the beta phase? Is there any timeline, or number of approved tasks, after which this becomes a production version? |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2214 Credit: 42,212,638 RAC: 22,870 ![]() |
So then I'm lucky to have a higher percentage of tasks complete successfully. I don't think so. I think the previous batch of 2.5m allowed parameters outside of a range it could process And, I assume in reaction, the current batch of 2.2m hasn't produced a single error of that type for any in my team I'm just wondering the same thing as everyone else on the forum I've been here a long time and I'm not wondering any of these things tbh. Sometimes they do detail capabilities of new versions to us, but it's their business far more than ours, so I don't mind if they don't. I trust them. We're here to provide process capacity - we can either do that or not ![]() ![]() |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Rosetta Beta 6.00
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org