Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.07

Message boards : Number crunching : Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.07

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next

AuthorMessage
tralala

Send message
Joined: 8 Apr 06
Posts: 376
Credit: 581,806
RAC: 0
Message 15443 - Posted: 3 May 2006, 21:40:11 UTC - in response to Message 15429.  
Last modified: 3 May 2006, 21:40:21 UTC

OS = Linux 2.6.10
CPU = AMD Sempron 3000+
Memory = 1024M (64M shared video)

Failure Rate: approximately 70%

With v5.01 of the Rosetta app, this rig ran clean. Near 100% completion.
With v5.07, I'm lucky to get 1 result in 3 successfully completed.

Any suggestions?


I looked on your host and I see as many errors for 5.01 as for 5.07. All failed WU on your host completed succesful on another host. Almost all your errors have exit code 131 - this may help the team to figure out what's going on on your machine.
ID: 15443 · Rating: 1 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Dimitris Hatzopoulos

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 06
Posts: 336
Credit: 80,939
RAC: 0
Message 15444 - Posted: 3 May 2006, 21:42:11 UTC - in response to Message 15429.  
Last modified: 3 May 2006, 21:44:42 UTC

OS = Linux 2.6.10
CPU = AMD Sempron 3000+
Memory = 1024M (64M shared video)

Failure Rate: approximately 70%

With v5.01 of the Rosetta app, this rig ran clean. Near 100% completion.
With v5.07, I'm lucky to get 1 result in 3 successfully completed.

Any suggestions?


Looking at your host's log, you seem to get SIGSEGV errors.

Btw, do you have Leave-in-mem-when-preempted=YES? (I would try this first). It looks as if WUs are restarted several times. Which Linux distro (FC5?)

Also see here for others having similar problem.
Best UFO Resources
Wikipedia R@h
How-To: Join Distributed Computing projects that benefit humanity
ID: 15444 · Rating: 1 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
charmed

Send message
Joined: 2 Nov 05
Posts: 11
Credit: 1,780,440
RAC: 0
Message 15445 - Posted: 3 May 2006, 21:43:25 UTC
Last modified: 3 May 2006, 21:44:42 UTC

This work unit failed as I was watching it https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=19041999
Running Win xp on an Athlon64 3200+ with 1gb memory.

ID: 15445 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile David Emigh
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Mar 06
Posts: 158
Credit: 417,178
RAC: 0
Message 15472 - Posted: 4 May 2006, 2:51:57 UTC - in response to Message 15443.  
Last modified: 4 May 2006, 3:03:33 UTC

I looked on your host and I see as many errors for 5.01 as for 5.07. All failed WU on your host completed succesful on another host. Almost all your errors have exit code 131 - this may help the team to figure out what's going on on your machine.


Many thanks for your quick response =)

I am especially grateful for the detective work that produced the exit code. I will be sure to include this in further posts regarding this host.
ID: 15472 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile David Emigh
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Mar 06
Posts: 158
Credit: 417,178
RAC: 0
Message 15473 - Posted: 4 May 2006, 3:01:49 UTC - in response to Message 15444.  
Last modified: 4 May 2006, 3:02:30 UTC

Looking at your host's log, you seem to get SIGSEGV errors.

Btw, do you have Leave-in-mem-when-preempted=YES? (I would try this first). It looks as if WUs are restarted several times. Which Linux distro (FC5?)

Also see here for others having similar problem.


Awesome response!!!

I set the leave-in-mem-when-preempted to NO quite a while ago when I saw a message in technical news that said to do so. I will return that variable to YES immediately.

The Linux distribution I am using is LinSpire 5.0 (build 5.0.59).

Thank you very much for your response =)
ID: 15473 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
tralala

Send message
Joined: 8 Apr 06
Posts: 376
Credit: 581,806
RAC: 0
Message 15483 - Posted: 4 May 2006, 6:10:49 UTC

Not a failure but a "suspicious" WU:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=19037537

This one generated 1123 decoys in 8 hours. Each model started in Full Atom Relax Mode in a somewhat "unfolded" stage (only a part of the amino acid strain was visible) and had alsways high RMSD (about 50). After a few steps it quited and started a new model.
ID: 15483 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Rebirther
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 116
Credit: 41,315
RAC: 0
Message 15488 - Posted: 4 May 2006, 10:08:55 UTC

I have suspend following WU: FA_CASP6_t198__470_5745_0
After 2:13h only 1.04%. Steps increasing very low.
Last entry stdout.txt:
CYCLES::number is 1 x total_residue: 69
initializing full atom coordinates
BOINC :: [2006-05-04 11:46:11] :: checkpoint_decoys() :: saved decoy info :: attempted_decoys: 7 :: num_decoys: 7 :: farlx_stage: 10
dump_fullatom_pdb: farlxcheck
starting score 357.328156 rms 4.70180273
starting full atom minimization
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-infinite_loop]

Should I running further or abort it? Don`t know how long does it take? Normally 3h for one WU. 200MB RAM usage now.
ID: 15488 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
tralala

Send message
Joined: 8 Apr 06
Posts: 376
Credit: 581,806
RAC: 0
Message 15491 - Posted: 4 May 2006, 11:17:47 UTC - in response to Message 15488.  

I have suspend following WU: FA_CASP6_t198__470_5745_0
After 2:13h only 1.04%. Steps increasing very low.
Last entry stdout.txt:
CYCLES::number is 1 x total_residue: 69
initializing full atom coordinates
BOINC :: [2006-05-04 11:46:11] :: checkpoint_decoys() :: saved decoy info :: attempted_decoys: 7 :: num_decoys: 7 :: farlx_stage: 10
dump_fullatom_pdb: farlxcheck
starting score 357.328156 rms 4.70180273
starting full atom minimization
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-infinite_loop]

Should I running further or abort it? Don`t know how long does it take? Normally 3h for one WU. 200MB RAM usage now.

t198 is one of the bigger proteins - 235 amino acids. I'd let it run at least 4 hour before I abort. Better abort only if reaching 24 hours and the 300 credit claiming barrier for failed WUs.
ID: 15491 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile rbpeake

Send message
Joined: 25 Sep 05
Posts: 168
Credit: 247,828
RAC: 0
Message 15500 - Posted: 4 May 2006, 12:12:32 UTC - in response to Message 15491.  

I have suspend following WU: FA_CASP6_t198__470_5745_0
After 2:13h only 1.04%. Steps increasing very low....
Don`t know how long does it take? Normally 3h for one WU. 200MB RAM usage now.

t198 is one of the bigger proteins - 235 amino acids. I'd let it run at least 4 hour before I abort. Better abort only if reaching 24 hours and the 300 credit claiming barrier for failed WUs.

I had one run over my 8 hour preference time, but then it completed. Just a huge protein it seems! Now I have set my preference time to 12 hours. And I have learned to be patient! :)

Regards,
Bob P.
ID: 15500 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Feet1st
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 1755
Credit: 4,690,520
RAC: 0
Message 15512 - Posted: 4 May 2006, 15:49:26 UTC
Last modified: 4 May 2006, 15:52:58 UTC

Keep in mind, that 1.04% number is REALLY just telling you that it is still on model 1. Once it completes model one it will recompute the % completed and may determine that you're 60% done, or even 100% and end it.
Add this signature to your EMail:
Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might!
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/
ID: 15512 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile kb7rzf
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 05
Posts: 16
Credit: 35,427
RAC: 0
Message 15521 - Posted: 4 May 2006, 17:24:40 UTC

Got this error on This WU, and here's the info:

Result ID 18984230
Name HBLR_1.0_2tif_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_CHECKPOINTS_482_214_0
Workunit 15712387
Created 3 May 2006 0:08:00 UTC
Sent 3 May 2006 4:07:40 UTC
Received 4 May 2006 16:13:06 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Computing
Exit status 1 (0x1)
Computer ID 12719
Report deadline 17 May 2006 4:07:40 UTC
CPU time 8127.546875
stderr out <core_client_version>5.4.2</core_client_version>
<message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# random seed: 1065667
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
ERROR:: Exit at: .hbonds.cc line:293

</stderr_txt>


Validate state Invalid
Claimed credit 15.0702212672248
Granted credit 0
application version 5.07


Thanks.

Jeremy

ID: 15521 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile arminius

Send message
Joined: 23 Sep 05
Posts: 8
Credit: 808,475
RAC: 276
Message 15531 - Posted: 4 May 2006, 20:27:18 UTC


ID: 15531 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
BennyRop

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 05
Posts: 555
Credit: 140,800
RAC: 0
Message 15550 - Posted: 5 May 2006, 4:45:48 UTC

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=18872518
Swap space 1692.22 MB
Total disk space 29.29 GB
Free Disk Space 8.53 GB
---
Use no more than 10 GB disk space
Leave at least 0.01 GB disk space free
Use no more than 50% of total disk space
Write to disk at most every 60 seconds
Use no more than 75% of total virtual memory

----

Generally, when I look at the memory usage on the machine itself, Rosetta is only claiming to use up around 20 megs. None of the partitions have less than 8 gigs free space - so did that WU really eat up the 8.52 gigs of HD space on the C: partition before erroring out?


ID: 15550 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
BennyRop

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 05
Posts: 555
Credit: 140,800
RAC: 0
Message 15555 - Posted: 5 May 2006, 6:41:18 UTC

5/2/2006 5:40:48 PM|rosetta@home|Aborting result JUMPTEST_CLOSECHAINBREAKS_1tul__469_2429_0: exceeded disk limit: 100308693.000000 > 100000000.000000
5/2/2006 5:40:48 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMPTEST_CLOSECHAINBREAKS_1tul__469_2429_0 (Maximum disk usage exceeded)

From the message log, I see that it's whining about going over 100 megs. Where did it get this value from, since I can't see that representing the settings I've chosen for Boinc&Rosetta.
ID: 15555 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jimi@0wned.org.uk

Send message
Joined: 10 Mar 06
Posts: 29
Credit: 335,252
RAC: 0
Message 15557 - Posted: 5 May 2006, 8:34:15 UTC

2 WUs with coding errors?

WU 15827716

<core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version>
<message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# random seed: 1048865
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
ERROR:: Exit at: .hbonds.cc line:293

</stderr_txt>

WU 15757279

<core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version>
<message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# random seed: 1767551
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
ID: 15557 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Trog Dog
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 05
Posts: 129
Credit: 57,345
RAC: 0
Message 15559 - Posted: 5 May 2006, 11:41:51 UTC - in response to Message 15278.  


this is the system I am looking at. In the CPU section it shows as a 4 CPU system, but under number of CPUs to use is says 1.

Pardon the intrusion guys, but does'nt the 4 just mean it is a Pentium 4 ?


Yep, its a p4 - number of cpus is only reported as 1 so it doesn't even support hyper threading.
ID: 15559 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Jon C Melusky
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 05
Posts: 12
Credit: 232,942
RAC: 2,082
Message 15587 - Posted: 5 May 2006, 18:30:19 UTC

Hi,

I am running 5 BOINC projects, but here are the Rosetta lines of info. Looks like Rosetta has not worked in 4 days. Or so says the BOINC manager statistics tab.

5/5/2006 5:00:53 AM||Starting BOINC client version 5.2.13 for windows_intelx86
5/5/2006 5:00:53 AM||libcurl/7.14.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8 zlib/1.2.3
5/5/2006 5:00:53 AM||Data directory: C:Program FilesBOINC
5/5/2006 5:00:54 AM||Processor: 1 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU 1400MHz
5/5/2006 5:00:54 AM||Memory: 382.52 MB physical, 728.66 MB virtual
5/5/2006 5:00:54 AM||Disk: 93.15 GB total, 12.41 GB free
5/5/2006 5:00:54 AM|rosetta@home|Computer ID: 78725; location: home; project prefs: default
5/5/2006 5:00:58 AM|rosetta@home|Deferring computation for result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_CHECKPOINTS_482_2037_0
5/5/2006 7:30:59 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_CHECKPOINTS_482_2037_0 using rosetta version 507
5/5/2006 7:35:38 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_CHECKPOINTS_482_2037_0 ( - exit code -529697949 (0xe06d7363))
5/5/2006 7:35:38 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_CHECKPOINTS_482_2037_0 finished
5/5/2006 7:36:39 AM|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi
5/5/2006 7:36:39 AM|rosetta@home|Reason: To fetch work
5/5/2006 7:36:39 AM|rosetta@home|Requesting 8640 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 results
5/5/2006 7:36:48 AM|rosetta@home|Scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi succeeded
5/5/2006 7:36:50 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1tul_.fasta.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:50 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1tul.pdb.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:52 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of 1tul_.fasta.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:52 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 476 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:36:52 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of 1tul.pdb.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:52 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 19178 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:36:52 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1tul_.psipred_ss2.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:52 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of aa1tul_03_05.200_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:54 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of 1tul_.psipred_ss2.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:54 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 4763 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:36:54 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of aa1tul_09_05.200_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 7:38:35 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of aa1tul_03_05.200_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 7:38:35 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 13194 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:38:35 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of alltopcodes.pdat.gz
5/5/2006 7:38:37 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of alltopcodes.pdat.gz
5/5/2006 7:38:37 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 7279 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:38:37 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of allbarcodes04.bar.gz
5/5/2006 7:38:43 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of allbarcodes04.bar.gz
5/5/2006 7:38:43 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 9792 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:39:38 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of aa1tul_09_05.200_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 7:39:38 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 18857 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:39:39 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded
5/5/2006 7:53:10 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
5/5/2006 9:39:03 AM|rosetta@home|Starting result JUMP_ALLBARCODE04_1tul__468_8868_0 using rosetta version 507
5/5/2006 9:39:25 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_ALLBARCODE04_1tul__468_8868_0 ( - exit code -164 (0xffffff5c))
5/5/2006 9:39:25 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
5/5/2006 9:39:25 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result JUMP_ALLBARCODE04_1tul__468_8868_0 finished
5/5/2006 9:40:28 AM|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi
5/5/2006 9:40:28 AM|rosetta@home|Reason: To fetch work
5/5/2006 9:40:28 AM|rosetta@home|Requesting 8640 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 results
5/5/2006 9:40:44 AM|rosetta@home|Scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi succeeded
5/5/2006 9:40:46 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1hz6A.psipred_ss2.gz
5/5/2006 9:40:46 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of aa1hz6A03_05.400_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 9:40:49 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of 1hz6A.psipred_ss2.gz
5/5/2006 9:40:49 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 309 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 9:40:49 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of frags400.txt
5/5/2006 9:41:02 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of frags400.txt
5/5/2006 9:41:02 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 91 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 9:41:02 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1hz6.pdb.gz
5/5/2006 9:41:09 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of 1hz6.pdb.gz
5/5/2006 9:41:09 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 1475 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 9:41:09 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of aa1hz6A09_05.400_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 9:41:47 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded
5/5/2006 9:42:14 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of aa1hz6A03_05.400_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 9:42:14 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 12589 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 9:42:14 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1hz6A.fasta
5/5/2006 9:42:16 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of 1hz6A.fasta
5/5/2006 9:42:16 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 48 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 9:43:22 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of aa1hz6A09_05.400_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 9:43:22 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 21418 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 9:43:23 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded

cheers,

Jonathan
ID: 15587 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Robert Everly

Send message
Joined: 8 Oct 05
Posts: 27
Credit: 665,094
RAC: 0
Message 15590 - Posted: 5 May 2006, 20:33:36 UTC

Two 5.07s died here.

resultid=19196099 died with <core_client_version>5.4.3</core_client_version>
<message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# random seed: 1535558
# cpu_run_time_pref: 21600
# cpu_run_time_pref: 21600
# cpu_run_time_pref: 21600
# cpu_run_time_pref: 21600
# cpu_run_time_pref: 21600
ERROR:: Exit at: .dock_structure.cc line:401

</stderr_txt>

and

resultid=19101907 died with
<core_client_version>5.4.3</core_client_version>
<message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# random seed: 3953224
# cpu_run_time_pref: 21600
# cpu_run_time_pref: 21600
# cpu_run_time_pref: 21600
ERROR:: Exit at: .hbonds.cc line:293

</stderr_txt>

These are my first errors in a long time, so keep up the good work.
ID: 15590 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Rhiju
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 8 Jan 06
Posts: 223
Credit: 3,546
RAC: 0
Message 15597 - Posted: 6 May 2006, 3:46:48 UTC - in response to Message 15488.  

Hi Rebirther and others with "1.04%" after 3 hours or so, please let them run until they go about 4 times your cpu run time preference. (If you haven't set a preference, our default is 3 hours, so let them run 12 hours.) If they're running longer, the jobs should be aborted by the watchdog, but please post here if not!

I have suspend following WU: FA_CASP6_t198__470_5745_0
After 2:13h only 1.04%. Steps increasing very low.
Last entry stdout.txt:
CYCLES::number is 1 x total_residue: 69
initializing full atom coordinates
BOINC :: [2006-05-04 11:46:11] :: checkpoint_decoys() :: saved decoy info :: attempted_decoys: 7 :: num_decoys: 7 :: farlx_stage: 10
dump_fullatom_pdb: farlxcheck
starting score 357.328156 rms 4.70180273
starting full atom minimization
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-infinite_loop]

Should I running further or abort it? Don`t know how long does it take? Normally 3h for one WU. 200MB RAM usage now.


ID: 15597 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Rhiju
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 8 Jan 06
Posts: 223
Credit: 3,546
RAC: 0
Message 15599 - Posted: 6 May 2006, 3:50:59 UTC - in response to Message 15587.  

Hi Jon: thanks for posting. We definitely don't want Rosetta to be dysfunctional on your PC! Can you possibly post here a link to your failed workunits? In the boinc manager, you can hit "Your results" and it will give you the links.

We are now beginning a big push on our test server ralph to track down the final set of bugs in rosetta@home. The app there is getting more debugging machinery added every few days. So if any users out there are seeing repeated failures on rosetta@home (there don't seem to be many -- our error rates are low), please consider attaching your computer to ralph!

Hi,

I am running 5 BOINC projects, but here are the Rosetta lines of info. Looks like Rosetta has not worked in 4 days. Or so says the BOINC manager statistics tab.

5/5/2006 5:00:53 AM||Starting BOINC client version 5.2.13 for windows_intelx86
5/5/2006 5:00:53 AM||libcurl/7.14.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8 zlib/1.2.3
5/5/2006 5:00:53 AM||Data directory: C:Program FilesBOINC
5/5/2006 5:00:54 AM||Processor: 1 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU 1400MHz
5/5/2006 5:00:54 AM||Memory: 382.52 MB physical, 728.66 MB virtual
5/5/2006 5:00:54 AM||Disk: 93.15 GB total, 12.41 GB free
5/5/2006 5:00:54 AM|rosetta@home|Computer ID: 78725; location: home; project prefs: default
5/5/2006 5:00:58 AM|rosetta@home|Deferring computation for result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_CHECKPOINTS_482_2037_0
5/5/2006 7:30:59 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_CHECKPOINTS_482_2037_0 using rosetta version 507
5/5/2006 7:35:38 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_CHECKPOINTS_482_2037_0 ( - exit code -529697949 (0xe06d7363))
5/5/2006 7:35:38 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_CHECKPOINTS_482_2037_0 finished
5/5/2006 7:36:39 AM|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi
5/5/2006 7:36:39 AM|rosetta@home|Reason: To fetch work
5/5/2006 7:36:39 AM|rosetta@home|Requesting 8640 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 results
5/5/2006 7:36:48 AM|rosetta@home|Scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi succeeded
5/5/2006 7:36:50 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1tul_.fasta.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:50 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1tul.pdb.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:52 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of 1tul_.fasta.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:52 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 476 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:36:52 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of 1tul.pdb.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:52 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 19178 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:36:52 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1tul_.psipred_ss2.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:52 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of aa1tul_03_05.200_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:54 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of 1tul_.psipred_ss2.gz
5/5/2006 7:36:54 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 4763 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:36:54 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of aa1tul_09_05.200_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 7:38:35 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of aa1tul_03_05.200_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 7:38:35 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 13194 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:38:35 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of alltopcodes.pdat.gz
5/5/2006 7:38:37 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of alltopcodes.pdat.gz
5/5/2006 7:38:37 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 7279 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:38:37 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of allbarcodes04.bar.gz
5/5/2006 7:38:43 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of allbarcodes04.bar.gz
5/5/2006 7:38:43 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 9792 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:39:38 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of aa1tul_09_05.200_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 7:39:38 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 18857 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 7:39:39 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded
5/5/2006 7:53:10 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
5/5/2006 9:39:03 AM|rosetta@home|Starting result JUMP_ALLBARCODE04_1tul__468_8868_0 using rosetta version 507
5/5/2006 9:39:25 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_ALLBARCODE04_1tul__468_8868_0 ( - exit code -164 (0xffffff5c))
5/5/2006 9:39:25 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
5/5/2006 9:39:25 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result JUMP_ALLBARCODE04_1tul__468_8868_0 finished
5/5/2006 9:40:28 AM|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi
5/5/2006 9:40:28 AM|rosetta@home|Reason: To fetch work
5/5/2006 9:40:28 AM|rosetta@home|Requesting 8640 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 results
5/5/2006 9:40:44 AM|rosetta@home|Scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi succeeded
5/5/2006 9:40:46 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1hz6A.psipred_ss2.gz
5/5/2006 9:40:46 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of aa1hz6A03_05.400_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 9:40:49 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of 1hz6A.psipred_ss2.gz
5/5/2006 9:40:49 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 309 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 9:40:49 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of frags400.txt
5/5/2006 9:41:02 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of frags400.txt
5/5/2006 9:41:02 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 91 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 9:41:02 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1hz6.pdb.gz
5/5/2006 9:41:09 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of 1hz6.pdb.gz
5/5/2006 9:41:09 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 1475 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 9:41:09 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of aa1hz6A09_05.400_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 9:41:47 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded
5/5/2006 9:42:14 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of aa1hz6A03_05.400_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 9:42:14 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 12589 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 9:42:14 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1hz6A.fasta
5/5/2006 9:42:16 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of 1hz6A.fasta
5/5/2006 9:42:16 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 48 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 9:43:22 AM|rosetta@home|Finished download of aa1hz6A09_05.400_v1_3.gz
5/5/2006 9:43:22 AM|rosetta@home|Throughput 21418 bytes/sec
5/5/2006 9:43:23 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded

cheers,

Jonathan


ID: 15599 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.07



©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org