Predictor of the day: Congratulations to grcpool.com-2 (Team Gridcoin) for predicting the lowest energy structure for workunit cd28_1yjd_graft_v1_SAVE_ALL_OUT__1013384_0 !

Finally someone predicts the lowest energy for a "graft" workunits.

Perhaps it's not work wasted?
These workunits, as noted in the forum by many users, produce a lot of bad errors in the stderr. None of the staff answered, so to be safe that my energy is not wasted I abort all of these workunits when they come. Then, annoyed from the fact that after more than a month nobody told us that yes, they are producing work despite the errors, I stopped supporting Rosetta despite it is my favourite projects with regard to science. I really cannot understand why people from the staff do not realize that we are spending energy, time and a lot of money to help them. A short message about those workunits full of errors it's the minimum we can ask.

File: ......srcprotocolsmotif_graftingmoversMotifGraftMover.cc:537
For this scaffold there are not suitable scaffold grafts within your constrains
------------------------ Begin developer's backtrace -------------------------
BACKTRACE:
------------------------- End developer's backtrace --------------------------


AN INTERNAL ERROR HAS OCCURED. PLEASE SEE THE CONTENTS OF ROSETTA_CRASH.log FOR DETAILS.

when i take a look at the rosetta screensaver, i can see some "non-continuous drawing" with 2 or more proteins not connected between them ...

i beleive that the app can't make some protein folding between them because they're not connected ?

and the same error message appear in the Rosetta_crash.log, perhaps it's better not to write error messages in the stderr.txt .

These "graft" workunits are issued since end August if I remember well. While the very first weeks I thought it was a mistake and so no science was done, now, after two month and after many more workunits with different names but always with "graft" in the name and always with the same message in the stderr, I am starting thinking that actually it is not a mistake but just a characteristic of these type of experiment and they are doing science even with the error message. A lot of time has passed and I really hope that the scientists aren't wasting so much computing power (especially considering the high quality of science they are doing). Even though, I still have some bad feelings when I see workunits with so much errors in the stderr and I don't like that, despite many people on this forum pointed out this problem, nobody answered. Just a three words sentence is fine "Everything is working fine". Why leaving volunteers with this doubt?

when i take a look at the rosetta screensaver, i can see some "non-continuous drawing" with 2 or more proteins not connected between them ...

very interesting, it's a pity I cannot see the screensaver on Linux. It would be wonderful to have an explanation for the science behind each type of WU![/quote]