Record performances with EPYC

Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Record performances with EPYC

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1999
Credit: 9,747,451
RAC: 9,335
Message 94846 - Posted: 19 Apr 2020, 8:41:08 UTC
Last modified: 19 Apr 2020, 8:41:22 UTC

Supermicro Sets World Record Performance with AMD EPYC Processors
There are the new cpus Epyc 7fx2

These cpus on Rosetta (maybe with SSEx/Avx instrunctions!!) will be great. :-P
ID: 94846 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
spRocket
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Mar 20
Posts: 22
Credit: 3,008,018
RAC: 0
Message 94851 - Posted: 19 Apr 2020, 10:10:07 UTC - in response to Message 94846.  

*drool*

I wish I could afford even one of those. Even a Ryzen 9 is a bit too rich for my finances, though.
ID: 94851 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Grant (SSSF)

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 20
Posts: 1699
Credit: 18,186,917
RAC: 21,561
Message 94854 - Posted: 19 Apr 2020, 10:20:20 UTC - in response to Message 94851.  

*drool*

I wish I could afford even one of those. Even a Ryzen 9 is a bit too rich for my finances, though.
Yeah. I used a web site to set up a new system (just in case i won the lotto) based on a Ryzen 9 3900X.
$3,000 and a bit (and that's without a video card, i'd use one from an existing system).
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 94854 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
William Albert

Send message
Joined: 22 Mar 20
Posts: 23
Credit: 1,069,070
RAC: 22
Message 94970 - Posted: 20 Apr 2020, 7:19:52 UTC - in response to Message 94846.  

The AMD EPYC 7Fx2 series is intended for applications that benefit more from frequency and cache, over raw thread count. However, Rosetta@home is perfectly able to use as many threads as a system has available (provided that the machine has sufficient RAM).

While these frequency-optimized SKUs are impressive for their intended workload, they wouldn't be optimal for Rosetta compared to the existing 2nd generation Epyc lineup.
ID: 94970 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Chilean
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 05
Posts: 711
Credit: 26,694,507
RAC: 0
Message 95067 - Posted: 21 Apr 2020, 19:37:11 UTC - in response to Message 94970.  

The AMD EPYC 7Fx2 series is intended for applications that benefit more from frequency and cache, over raw thread count. However, Rosetta@home is perfectly able to use as many threads as a system has available (provided that the machine has sufficient RAM).

While these frequency-optimized SKUs are impressive for their intended workload, they wouldn't be optimal for Rosetta compared to the existing 2nd generation Epyc lineup.


Isn't Rosetta L3-Cache hungry?

Is it correct that as time goes on, L3 cache will eventually turn into "RAM"? I remember having a computer with 64MB of RAM... and now we have a CPU with 256MB of L3 CACHE.
ID: 95067 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 95081 - Posted: 21 Apr 2020, 23:17:38 UTC - in response to Message 95067.  

Any large application, or application that uses large data structures will be "cache hungry", and will perform better with a larger cache available.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 95081 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Record performances with EPYC



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org