Message boards : Number crunching : Report stuck & aborted WU here please - II
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 . . . 9 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~MAB The Frisian Send message Joined: 6 Nov 05 Posts: 87 Credit: 497,588 RAC: 0 |
Just a reminder to those who are posting stuck WU's -- please abort the 4 work units below. We know why they're hanging, are not sending out anymore, and are giving credits to any of these jobs that have timed out! Thanks. Random, I suppose. I have let a Wu go on (graphics were moving) so it timed out or it aborted itself and no credits. Can't be positive anymore about this project. Have run it for about 5 months and another fortnight and than it's over. |
Chilcotin Send message Joined: 5 Nov 05 Posts: 15 Credit: 16,969,500 RAC: 0 |
Workunit aborted after 23 hours. Stuck at 1.04 %. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=13940837 Link edit: looks like this may be one of the 4 already flagged in the postings above ... |
Laurenu2 Send message Joined: 6 Nov 05 Posts: 57 Credit: 3,818,778 RAC: 0 |
The 1.4 stalls are still coming I am vary tired of aborting them and losing the tens of thousands of points that are NOT granted in wasted CPU time. If this project is going to keep letting out BAD work WU's. Rosetta need to find a way to purge these Bad WU's from there servers when they are found to cause problems like these have. And / or send commands to the users client to delete or abort the Bad WU's on any upload / download to the Rosetta servers. To keep all the bad WU's in the system or on the Rosetta servers and forcing us to run them to purge them them from the Rosetta system is unfair to us and does damage to the project reputation. if this continue with out relief people will start to abandon this project If You Want The Best You Must forget The Rest ---------------And Join Free-DC---------------- |
David Baker Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 705 Credit: 559,847 RAC: 0 |
The 1.4 stalls are still coming I am vary tired of aborting them and losing the tens of thousands of points that are NOT granted in wasted CPU time. again, we are very sorry for the problems of the recent days. we have spent most of today taking steps to ensure that these problems do not occur again. all the problem work units have been cancelled, and everything should be back to normal very soon (once the jobs that have already been downloaded have left your machines). since CASP is starting soon, and many of the proteins will be larger, we wanted to do some calculatoins on a broader range of sizes. before pursuing this much further, we need some way of ensuring that these jobs are only sent out to machines appropriate for them, which is difficult with the current BOINC setup; we hope Rom can help us with this. |
rbpeake Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 168 Credit: 247,828 RAC: 0 |
since CASP is starting soon, and many of the proteins will be larger, we wanted to do some calculatoins on a broader range of sizes. before pursuing this much further, we need some way of ensuring that these jobs are only sent out to machines appropriate for them, which is difficult with the current BOINC setup; we hope Rom can help us with this. Beta 5.00 under Ralph@home preliminarily seems to be successfully processing work units that had previously failed under earlier versions of Rosetta. So it may not be the machines that are at fault, but the underlying Rosetta software itself (which seems to be on the way to being cleaned up if these early successes continue to hold up). Regards, Bob P. |
BennyRop Send message Joined: 17 Dec 05 Posts: 555 Credit: 140,800 RAC: 0 |
since CASP is starting soon, and many of the proteins will be larger, we wanted to do some calculatoins on a broader range of sizes. before pursuing this much further, we need some way of ensuring that these jobs are only sent out to machines appropriate for them, which is difficult with the current BOINC setup; we hope Rom can help us with this. When you upload information to the server, does it verify who it's coming from, or just blindly accept it, and then process it to see if it came from an actual machine running Rosetta? If Boinc sends a request from hostid=121218 for another workunit, can't the amount of ram (and cpu speed) be looked up from the database that displays this info: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/show_host_detail.php?hostid=121218 Oops.. it doesn't list speed.. just the text cpuID. (speed would thus be based on the floating point and integer ratings..) And then use something like this to determine what to send to each machine? (Ram=Ram/number of cpu cores) If hostid(121218).Ram > 750 Megs, then send EvenBiggerRamWU. If hostid(121218).Ram > 500 Megs, then send BigRamWU. If hostid(121218).Ram > 225 Megs, then send NormalWU. |
Laurenu2 Send message Joined: 6 Nov 05 Posts: 57 Credit: 3,818,778 RAC: 0 |
But what about the removal of bad WU's from your servers You must set up a way to stop the resending out of the BAD WU's Letting the system purge it self is not right. You have the capability to do auto upgrades you should have the capability to auto abort bad WU;s on client side To let bad WU's run on yours or our system is a BAD THING If You Want The Best You Must forget The Rest ---------------And Join Free-DC---------------- |
David Baker Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 705 Credit: 559,847 RAC: 0 |
But what about the removal of bad WU's from your servers You must set up a way to stop the resending out of the BAD WU's Letting the system purge it self is not right. You have the capability to do auto upgrades you should have the capability to auto abort bad WU;s on client side To let bad WU's run on yours or our system is a BAD THING The bad WU's are removed from our servers, but we can't remove them from your machines. Hopefully there will be no more bad WU's at all so this won't be a problem anymore. |
Delk Send message Joined: 20 Feb 06 Posts: 25 Credit: 995,624 RAC: 0 |
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17102919 Manually aborted at 1% after 52 hrs, it was a dodgy truncate unit I missed when checking systems. Thing is though it did run for 52 hours does that mean the workunit timeouts only work on windows systems not linux? It would be good to know as I wont always be able to check up as often as I have been on these servers. Thanks |
Rhiju Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 8 Jan 06 Posts: 223 Credit: 3,546 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for the report. Timeouts should happen on all machines -- but in BOINC they're tied to the number of floating point operations, not wall clock time, unfortunately. Because the Windows app appears to be a little bit faster than the Linux app, timeouts will generally take more time on the linux apps. We completely understand that you can't check up on the servers all the time -- we're being extra vigilant to make sure this sort of problem doesn't happen again. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17102919 |
[B@H] Ray Send message Joined: 20 Sep 05 Posts: 118 Credit: 100,251 RAC: 0 |
I just aborted WU TRUNCATE_TERMINI_FULLRELAX_1b3aA_433_20_2 as this was still at 1.04% at close to 10 hours (CPU time= 35,419.17 seconds). When I checked the graphics a few times in the last hour nothing was hapening there also. Ray Pizza@Home Rays Place Rays place Forums |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 22 Dec 05 Posts: 71 Credit: 138,867 RAC: 0 |
Preferece run time 2 hours actual cpu time 5 hours 50 minutes Measured floating point speed 1417.88 million ops/sec Measured integer speed 3114.3 million ops/sec Done 1.48% Windows XP Rosetta 4.98 <message>aborted by user https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17217056 Click signature for global team stats |
anders n Send message Joined: 19 Sep 05 Posts: 403 Credit: 537,991 RAC: 0 |
Preferece run time 2 hours Hi Carlos I had 1 of those on a P4 2,8. It took 3 H + to compete it. Anders n |
[DPC]Division_Brabant~OldButNotSoWise Send message Joined: 23 Jan 06 Posts: 42 Credit: 371,797 RAC: 0 |
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17162086 Aborted at 1.8% after 5 hours or so, because the graphics also stopped. |
Bin Qian Send message Joined: 13 Jul 05 Posts: 33 Credit: 36,897 RAC: 0 |
Hi, Thanks for reporting this. We are working on maintaining a relative stable run time on these WUs. Also see my reply to this thread. Bin https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17162086 |
Cedomir Igaly Send message Joined: 5 Dec 05 Posts: 2 Credit: 66,345 RAC: 0 |
7521_largescale_large_fullatom_relax_dec7521_1_02_9.pdb_437_133_0 7486_largescale_large_fullatom_relax_dec7486_1_10_4.pdb_435_177_0 stuck (and aborted) at ~ 1% |
keitaisamurai Send message Joined: 21 Mar 06 Posts: 2 Credit: 55,037 RAC: 0 |
Work unit stuck at 1.04% with more than 175 HOURS of processing time (I really should check this computer more often). https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=15389604 Needless to say, I think I'll abort it... |
Sybr_E-N Send message Joined: 26 Nov 05 Posts: 2 Credit: 164,851 RAC: 0 |
50% error rate today... https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17261491 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17261490 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17261489 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17261456 All with the same error: <core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version> <message>Onjuiste functie. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> # random seed: 3316837 # random seed: 3316837 # cpu_run_time_pref: 7200 # Exception caught in nstruct loop ii=1 i=2 # num_decoys:1 attempts:2 cpu_run_time:5760.47 ERROR:: Exit at: .nblist.cc line:541 </stderr_txt> "Onjuiste functie" is Dutch ( :) ) for "wrong function" |
Angus Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 412 Credit: 321,053 RAC: 0 |
4/15/2006 12:26:24 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result ALL_TOPOLOGY_CODES_1shfA_434_201_0 (aborted by user) aborted result This seemed to freeze at 2.42% (I think - didn't do screen shot) and the CPU time in Boinc Manager had been stopped for almost an hour. Couldn't get into "show graphics" to look at progress. see this thread for no graphics problem Proudly Banned from Predictator@Home and now Cosmology@home as well. Added SETI to the list today. Temporary ban only - so need to work harder :) "You can't fix stupid" (Ron White) |
Gretchen Send message Joined: 1 Nov 05 Posts: 1 Credit: 21,277 RAC: 0 |
This one was up to 8 hours and 1.04% done, with 16 hours to go. So I aborted it.
|
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report stuck & aborted WU here please - II
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org