Rosetta 4.0+

Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta 4.0+

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 . . . 19 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1858
Credit: 8,134,285
RAC: 7,986
Message 88757 - Posted: 26 Apr 2018, 12:35:38 UTC - in response to Message 88754.  

The screensaver of all "Xy_00" wus crashes.


And all these XY have "validation error"
992595332
992595347
etc
ID: 88757 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
matsu_pl

Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 17
Posts: 1
Credit: 1,543,544
RAC: 0
Message 88775 - Posted: 29 Apr 2018, 20:44:13 UTC
Last modified: 29 Apr 2018, 20:50:33 UTC

Arch Linux on i7-4770, 16 GB RAM.
Yesterday I updated Arch. The update included (among others):
[2018-04-28 17:33] [ALPM] upgraded glibc (2.26-11 -> 2.27-2)
[2018-04-28 17:33] [ALPM] upgraded boinc (7.8.4-1 -> 7.8.4-3)
[2018-04-28 17:34] [ALPM] upgraded linux (4.15.15-1 -> 4.16.4-1)

After the update, all Rosetta 4.07 x86_64 tasks are failing.
For example:
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=993256201
rosetta_4.07_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: loadlocale.c:129: _nl_intern_locale_data: Assertion `cnt < (sizeof (_nl_value_type_LC_TIME) / sizeof (_nl_value_type_LC_TIME[0]))' failed.
SIGABRT: abort called

My /etc/locale.conf contains only:
LANG=en_US.UTF-8

LC_TIME is not set, and never was.
The systemd journal shows no errors, no warnings related to Boinc or rosetta.

Can the statically linked Rosetta executable binaries work with the new glibc 2.27?
The glibc 2.27 release notes:
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.27
The following paragraph is discussed at the very end:
"Statically compiled applications attempting to load locales compiled for the GNU C Library version 2.27 will fail and fall back to the builtin C/POSIX locale. The reason for this is that the addition of the new "%OB" and "%Ob", support for two grammatical forms of the month names, also extends the locale data binary format. Static applications needing locale support must be recompiled to match the runtime and data they are deployed with. In some distributions there is an upgrade window where dynamically linked applications may use a new library but the old locale data and also fall back to the builtin C/POSIX locales; restarting the application process is sufficient to fix this. "
ID: 88775 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
James W

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 12
Posts: 130
Credit: 1,766,254
RAC: 0
Message 88784 - Posted: 1 May 2018, 5:38:58 UTC

Application version Rosetta v4.07 windows_intelx86
Device 1759960, Task 993666529, and WU 895307298.
Status: Error while computing.
Outcome: Computation error
Client state: Compute error
Exit status: -529697949 (0xE06D7363) Unknown error code

Unhandled Exception Detected...
- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Out Of Memory (C++ Exception) (0xe06d7363) at address 0x75EBC54F

OS is Windows 7 Pro, 64. App for_86. Problems noted with this combination by other posters.
ID: 88784 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [AF>Libristes]Maeda
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 11
Posts: 4
Credit: 4,459,350
RAC: 2,246
Message 88800 - Posted: 2 May 2018, 21:49:35 UTC - in response to Message 88775.  

Arch Linux on i7-4770, 16 GB RAM.
Yesterday I updated Arch. The update included (among others):
[2018-04-28 17:33] [ALPM] upgraded glibc (2.26-11 -> 2.27-2)
[2018-04-28 17:33] [ALPM] upgraded boinc (7.8.4-1 -> 7.8.4-3)
[2018-04-28 17:34] [ALPM] upgraded linux (4.15.15-1 -> 4.16.4-1)

After the update, all Rosetta 4.07 x86_64 tasks are failing.
For example:
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=993256201
rosetta_4.07_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: loadlocale.c:129: _nl_intern_locale_data: Assertion `cnt < (sizeof (_nl_value_type_LC_TIME) / sizeof (_nl_value_type_LC_TIME[0]))' failed.
SIGABRT: abort called

Hello,

Same with my computer, 4.16.4-1-ARCH, updated on 4/27/2018. Rosetta Mini v3.78 seems to work, but I can't select only this app to avoid errors, please recompile it with last glibc version.

command: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.07_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -ignore_unrecognized_res 1 -abinitio::fastrelax 1 -ex2aro 1 -abinitio::use_filters false -out:file:silent default.out -abinitio::rsd_wt_loop 0.5 -beta 1 -abinitio::detect_disulfide_before_relax 1 -relax::minimize_bond_angles 1 -in:file:native 00001.pdb -silent_gz 1 -abinitio::rsd_wt_helix 0.5 -relax::default_repeats 15 -beta_cart 1 -frag3 00001.200.3mers -frag9 00001.200.9mers -abinitio::rg_reweight 0.5 -abinitio::increase_cycles 10 -out:file:silent_struct_type binary -ex1 1 -optimization::default_max_cycles 200 -relax::dualspace 1 -in:file:boinc_wu_zip NTF2chip_4741_data.zip -out:file:silent default.out -silent_gz -mute all -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -watchdog -boinc:max_nstruct 600 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 2874706
rosetta_4.07_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: loadlocale.c:129: _nl_intern_locale_data: Assertion `cnt < (sizeof (_nl_value_type_LC_TIME) / sizeof (_nl_value_type_LC_TIME[0]))' failed.
SIGABRT: abort called
ID: 88800 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [AF>Libristes]Maeda
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 11
Posts: 4
Credit: 4,459,350
RAC: 2,246
Message 88805 - Posted: 3 May 2018, 11:23:05 UTC - in response to Message 88800.  

In fact, only the Rosetta 4.07 x86_64 are crashing.
ID: 88805 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mmonnin

Send message
Joined: 2 Jun 16
Posts: 54
Credit: 20,058,207
RAC: 4,830
Message 88830 - Posted: 8 May 2018, 1:41:44 UTC

Just had over 200 of these fail. So many in such quick succession that my BoincTasks client lost connection while they were all have computation errors. It finally came back with 4 running. Rosetta only, mini seem ok.
1950x, 32gb RAM, 500gb M.2 running 18.04. A 2700x also on 18.04 is running both apps just fine.
ID: 88830 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 05
Posts: 150
Credit: 3,818,279
RAC: 980
Message 88869 - Posted: 12 May 2018, 10:19:12 UTC - in response to Message 88743.  

Could be this is your problem (and mine...) but don't hold your breath for a fix.


No I wont be holding my breath, as that report, with the same error I have is from the 1st Feb 2018, so no fix for this 32 Bit issue for almost 3 months now.

And all the Ralph work units I have been given that have also failed with the same error have also not been fixed. What is the point of a test project when things are not tested?
No point at all.

Conan


Any progress on the 32 bit Rosetta 4.07 errors?

Rosetta Mini runs fine, so possibly a compiling issue or made for 64 bit instead of 32 bit?

All Rosetta 4.07 work units fail on my 32 bit XP Windows machine, this is on both Ralph and Rosetta.

Linux runs fine as well.

Conan
ID: 88869 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
gemini8

Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 12
Posts: 5
Credit: 2,286,088
RAC: 1,661
Message 88890 - Posted: 13 May 2018, 16:41:44 UTC

I know it's not an officially supported OS anymore, being older than macOS 10.11 'El Capitan', but while RosettaMini is working fine on Mac OS 10.6.8 'Snow Leopard', Rosetta crashes on it.
This might be related to Rosetta being compiled differently from RosettaMini.
It would be nice if I could switch Rosetta off on the server side, but after reading here about these many problems which aren't solved after all that time I think it's easier to fiddle with an app_config.xml .
Thanks.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Greetings, Jens
ID: 88890 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile akkin4

Send message
Joined: 17 Apr 18
Posts: 4
Credit: 2,664,458
RAC: 27
Message 88900 - Posted: 14 May 2018, 13:13:06 UTC - in response to Message 87456.  

Is there anything i can do to this Message "if this happend repeadely you may have to restart the prodject. Would avoid to start from beginning when the PC have worked mant houres for those task,s:(

Mvh akkin4.
ID: 88900 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jim1348

Send message
Joined: 19 Jan 06
Posts: 881
Credit: 52,257,545
RAC: 0
Message 88901 - Posted: 14 May 2018, 14:02:27 UTC
Last modified: 14 May 2018, 14:04:03 UTC

I picked up a few Rosetta 4.07, and they are now running fine after 2 to 3 hours on my Ubuntu 18.04 machine (i7-8700).
They are apparently not the x64, but it seems that corrective action has been taken.
ID: 88901 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
James W

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 12
Posts: 130
Credit: 1,766,254
RAC: 0
Message 88907 - Posted: 15 May 2018, 4:57:45 UTC - in response to Message 88900.  

From my own experience, as well as from advise from those more experienced than I, resetting a project --Rosetta-- doesn't fix this issue. As an example, here's what I just found in my Event Log:

5/14/2018 9:34:58 PM | Rosetta@home | Task f1_ems_ferrM_6847_fold_SAVE_ALL_OUT_575186_53_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
5/14/2018 9:34:58 PM | Rosetta@home | If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.

Certain WUs just seem to get this "no 'finished' file" error message often. As you say, resetting the project will delete the entire cache for the project and you'll get new WUs, losing credit for all work done on jobs in progress. This also will delay processing of all other WUs which were in your cache.
ID: 88907 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
rjs5

Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 10
Posts: 273
Credit: 21,307,254
RAC: 13,796
Message 88908 - Posted: 15 May 2018, 6:26:35 UTC - in response to Message 88907.  
Last modified: 15 May 2018, 6:29:46 UTC

From my own experience, as well as from advise from those more experienced than I, resetting a project --Rosetta-- doesn't fix this issue. As an example, here's what I just found in my Event Log:

5/14/2018 9:34:58 PM | Rosetta@home | Task f1_ems_ferrM_6847_fold_SAVE_ALL_OUT_575186_53_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
5/14/2018 9:34:58 PM | Rosetta@home | If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.

Certain WUs just seem to get this "no 'finished' file" error message often. As you say, resetting the project will delete the entire cache for the project and you'll get new WUs, losing credit for all work done on jobs in progress. This also will delay processing of all other WUs which were in your cache.


I have seen the "no finished file" message before on several projects. I think it is BOINC Windows and SHARE related. I think RESET does not clear it up. It is only a problem if it happens on the last time the finished file is written.

https://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=9870
ID: 88908 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1858
Credit: 8,134,285
RAC: 7,986
Message 88909 - Posted: 15 May 2018, 14:53:10 UTC

998588769
998588769


<stderr_txt>
command: projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.07_windows_x86_64.exe -silent_gz -mute all -s chainA_chainB_patchdock_split_02_18_05_17_16_06.pdb -patchdock chainA_chainB_patchdock_split_02_18_05_17_16_06.patchdock -patchdock_random_entry 1 322 -run:protocol jd2_scripting -jd2:dd_parser -parser:protocol global_docking_18_05_17_16_06.xml -out:nstruct 10000 -ex1 -ex2aro -beta -beta_cart -dualspace true -minimize_bond_lengths true -minimize_bond_angles true -jd2:ntrials 100 -use_input_sc -in:file:native chainA_chainB_18_05_17_16_06.pdb -out:file:silent default.out -out:file:silent_struct_type score_jump -run:write_failures false -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -watchdog -boinc:max_nstruct 600 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 3482445
Starting watchdog...
Watchdog active.
DummyMover::apply() should never have been called! (JobDistributor/Parser should have replaced DummyMover.)

ERROR: Function not implemented.
ERROR:: Exit from: ......srcappspublicboincminirosetta.cc line: 93
16:21:19 (5416): called boinc_finish(0)

</stderr_txt>

ID: 88909 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jim1348

Send message
Joined: 19 Jan 06
Posts: 881
Credit: 52,257,545
RAC: 0
Message 88915 - Posted: 16 May 2018, 14:08:39 UTC
Last modified: 16 May 2018, 14:12:29 UTC

They are still sending out the 4.07 x64 versions (as of this morning), and they are still failing (Ubuntu 18.04, i7-8700).

<core_client_version>7.8.3</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 195 (0xc3, -61)</message>
<stderr_txt>
09:23:38 (8952): wrapper (7.7.26016): starting
09:23:38 (8952): wrapper (7.7.26016): starting
09:23:38 (8952): wrapper: running ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/Miniconda3-4.3.30-Linux-x86_64.sh (-b -u -p /var/lib/boinc-client/projects/www.gpugrid.net/miniconda)
Python 3.6.3 :: Anaconda, Inc.
09:23:47 (8952): miniconda-installer exited; CPU time 7.696161
09:23:47 (8952): wrapper: running /var/lib/boinc-client/projects/www.gpugrid.net/miniconda/bin/python (pre_script.py)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/var/lib/boinc-client/projects/www.gpugrid.net/miniconda/envs/qmml/lib/python3.6/site-packages/psi4/__init__.py", line 55, in <module>
    from . import core
ImportError: /var/lib/boinc-client/projects/www.gpugrid.net/miniconda/envs/qmml/lib/python3.6/site-packages/psi4/core.so: undefined symbol: __svml_sin4

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "run-qmml.py", line 12, in <module>
    import psi4
  File "/var/lib/boinc-client/projects/www.gpugrid.net/miniconda/envs/qmml/lib/python3.6/site-packages/psi4/__init__.py", line 60, in <module>
    raise ImportError("{0}".format(err))
ImportError: /var/lib/boinc-client/projects/www.gpugrid.net/miniconda/envs/qmml/lib/python3.6/site-packages/psi4/core.so: undefined symbol: __svml_sin4
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "pre_script.py", line 31, in <module>
    raise Exception("Error running qmml")
Exception: Error running qmml
09:26:42 (8952): $PROJECT_DIR/miniconda/bin/python exited; CPU time 101.619166
09:26:42 (8952): app exit status: 0x1
09:26:42 (8952): called boinc_finish(195)

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=899858496
ID: 88915 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1858
Credit: 8,134,285
RAC: 7,986
Message 88916 - Posted: 16 May 2018, 14:38:47 UTC - in response to Message 88915.  

They are still sending out the 4.07 x64 versions (as of this morning), and they are still failing (Ubuntu 18.04, i7-8700).

[code]<core_client_version>7.8.3</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 195 (0xc3, -61)</message>
<stderr_txt>
09:23:38 (8952): wrapper (7.7.26016): starting
09:23:38 (8952): wrapper (7.7.26016): starting
09:23:38 (8952): wrapper: running ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/Miniconda3-4.3.30-Linux-x86_64.sh (-b -u -p /var/lib/boinc-client/projects/www.gpugrid.net/miniconda)
Python 3.6.3 :: Anaconda, Inc.



Gpugrid.net??
ID: 88916 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
rjs5

Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 10
Posts: 273
Credit: 21,307,254
RAC: 13,796
Message 88917 - Posted: 16 May 2018, 15:42:21 UTC - in response to Message 88916.  
Last modified: 16 May 2018, 16:24:02 UTC

They are still sending out the 4.07 x64 versions (as of this morning), and they are still failing (Ubuntu 18.04, i7-8700).

[code]<core_client_version>7.8.3</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 195 (0xc3, -61)</message>
<stderr_txt>
09:23:38 (8952): wrapper (7.7.26016): starting
09:23:38 (8952): wrapper (7.7.26016): starting
09:23:38 (8952): wrapper: running ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/Miniconda3-4.3.30-Linux-x86_64.sh (-b -u -p /var/lib/boinc-client/projects/www.gpugrid.net/miniconda)
Python 3.6.3 :: Anaconda, Inc.


Gpugrid.net??



If you look at his COMPUTERS, Linux is now including the GLIBC version in the Linux name and Ubuntu 18.04 comes with GLIBC 2.27.
Rosetta is statically linked and there is an incompatibility with the LOCALE between the the GLIBC they used and GLIBC2.27.

Linux Ubuntu
Ubuntu 18.04 LTS [4.15.0-20-generic|libc 2.27 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.27-3ubuntu1)]


Any Linux computer with GLIBC 2.27 will have problems running STATICALLY linked Rosetta 4.07.
Fedora 28 will also come with glibc 2.27 and will fail with Rosetta 4.07 (I guess I will hold off upgradng).
ANY next version of ANY Linux distribution will be using glic 2.27 and have problems with Rosetta 4.07.

I saw earlier, that someone had made a request for Rosetta to make the object files available so they could RELINK against GLIBC 2.27. The Rosetta project is REQUIRED by the GNU Free Software license they are using to provide the linkable object files to anyone who has a problem due to linking. Rosetta is probably in "technical violation" of the GNU license until they fix 4.07 or make the object files available.
ID: 88917 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jim1348

Send message
Joined: 19 Jan 06
Posts: 881
Credit: 52,257,545
RAC: 0
Message 88920 - Posted: 16 May 2018, 16:11:33 UTC - in response to Message 88916.  

Gpugrid.net??

Did I copy the wrong one? This is the one associated with that link for Workunit 899858496.

<core_client_version>7.9.3</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63)</message>
<stderr_txt>
command: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.07_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -run:protocol jd2_scripting @flags_rb_05_15_193_289__t000__0_C1_robetta -silent_gz -mute all -out:file:silent default.out -in:file:boinc_wu_zip input_rb_05_15_193_289__t000__0_C1_robetta.zip -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -watchdog -boinc:max_nstruct 600 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 3704428
rosetta_4.07_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: loadlocale.c:129: _nl_intern_locale_data: Assertion `cnt < (sizeof (_nl_value_type_LC_TIME) / sizeof (_nl_value_type_LC_TIME[0]))' failed.
SIGABRT: abort called
Stack trace (17 frames):
[0x5efead0]
[0x5ffe380]
[0x607e517]
[0x60083a8]
[0x6002794]
[0x60027ee]
[0x6000f73]
[0x6001996]
[0x60007df]
[0x600020e]
[0x5f1d10e]
[0x5f1d73e]
[0x5f1707a]
[0x5f17202]
[0x412631]
[0x5fff8cc]
[0x610b97]

Exiting...

</stderr_txt>


Thanks for catching it, but until they figure it out, it may not matter much. We can error on the errors.
ID: 88920 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
rjs5

Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 10
Posts: 273
Credit: 21,307,254
RAC: 13,796
Message 88926 - Posted: 16 May 2018, 16:34:05 UTC - in response to Message 88920.  

Anyone experiencing the locale error on a Linux machine with glibc 2.27 will probably see the those errors all 4.07 x86_64 WU sent to them. It appears 3.78 and 4.07 i686 are OK.
Nothing anyone can do other than Rosetta developer OR the person managing the job creation. Until they act, by fixing the locale problem OR discontinue sending 64 bit Linux jobs, crunchers will be burdened with the extra system overhead.
It is also costing Rosetta by sending the bogus WU and then tracking the failures.


Gpugrid.net??

Did I copy the wrong one? This is the one associated with that link for Workunit 899858496.

<core_client_version>7.9.3</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63)</message>
<stderr_txt>
command: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.07_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -run:protocol jd2_scripting @flags_rb_05_15_193_289__t000__0_C1_robetta -silent_gz -mute all -out:file:silent default.out -in:file:boinc_wu_zip input_rb_05_15_193_289__t000__0_C1_robetta.zip -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -watchdog -boinc:max_nstruct 600 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 3704428
rosetta_4.07_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: loadlocale.c:129: _nl_intern_locale_data: Assertion `cnt < (sizeof (_nl_value_type_LC_TIME) / sizeof (_nl_value_type_LC_TIME[0]))' failed.
SIGABRT: abort called
Stack trace (17 frames):
[0x5efead0]
[0x5ffe380]
[0x607e517]
[0x60083a8]
[0x6002794]
[0x60027ee]
[0x6000f73]
[0x6001996]
[0x60007df]
[0x600020e]
[0x5f1d10e]
[0x5f1d73e]
[0x5f1707a]
[0x5f17202]
[0x412631]
[0x5fff8cc]
[0x610b97]

Exiting...

</stderr_txt>


Thanks for catching it, but until they figure it out, it may not matter much. We can error on the errors.
ID: 88926 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jim1348

Send message
Joined: 19 Jan 06
Posts: 881
Credit: 52,257,545
RAC: 0
Message 88933 - Posted: 18 May 2018, 15:50:28 UTC - in response to Message 88926.  

It is also costing Rosetta by sending the bogus WU and then tracking the failures.

Another annoyance is that because the faulty work units run for only 2 seconds, they skew the BOINC time estimates. My Rosettas (24-hour version) are now showing only 2 hours. So that means BOINC downloads too many. I have to adjust by shortening the work buffer.

All Rosetta developers should be required to spend six months actually running their work on BOINC before they are let loose in the wild.
ID: 88933 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
[DPC]Remmus

Send message
Joined: 9 Nov 05
Posts: 6
Credit: 2,466,696
RAC: 0
Message 88934 - Posted: 18 May 2018, 17:52:02 UTC - in response to Message 88926.  

Is there an issue system to report this and see any progress.
Rosetta is now only sending 4.07 packages so my system is only cranking 'Error while computing' .......

I am running on a Fedora 28 x64 system.
ID: 88934 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 . . . 19 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta 4.0+



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org