Message boards : Number crunching : R@H Scientists/Coders: An analysis of the Rosetta binaries...
Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 2032 Credit: 10,222,911 RAC: 13,059 ![]() |
We might be able to help. Perhaps better to discuss via PM, some details under NDA. Welcome!! I hope you can help david and rsj5 |
![]() Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 2032 Credit: 10,222,911 RAC: 13,059 ![]() |
Last admin's post of this thread was 2015 :-( Since these days, Microsoft releases Visual Studio 2019 and GCC is now 8.3 version (with 9.1 ready for release). |
![]() Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 2032 Credit: 10,222,911 RAC: 13,059 ![]() |
... and GCC is now 8.3 version (with 9.1 ready for release). Today GCC9.1 is published, with a lot of new features (see my post on Ralph). Others features and tricks Link time and inter-procedural Usability improvements OpenMP5 support |
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 19 Jan 06 Posts: 881 Credit: 52,257,545 RAC: 0 |
They won't be getting big gains from hardware from now on. If they want to make progress, it will have to be with something like the D programming language (whatever it is). |
![]() Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 2032 Credit: 10,222,911 RAC: 13,059 ![]() |
They won't be getting big gains from hardware from now on. If they want to make progress, it will have to be with something like the D programming language (whatever it is). I'm not agree for hw. For example, the incoming AMD cpu (3xxx family) seems to be great. But i'm agree for sw. These cpus can be used very well with sse/avx extensions. D language? I know they passed from Fortran to C++ and, it i don't remember wrong, it was not so easy (and i don't know if 100% of the code is in C++ or there is still some Fortran libraries). So i don't think they want to change again. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
R@H Scientists/Coders: An analysis of the Rosetta binaries...
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org