simIF2...ProteinInterfaceDesign...-tasks

Message boards : Number crunching : simIF2...ProteinInterfaceDesign...-tasks

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Jochen

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 06
Posts: 133
Credit: 3,847,433
RAC: 0
Message 66956 - Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 6:03:13 UTC - in response to Message 66953.  

Hi Joe,

I'm trying to figure out whether these fc tasks are giving you trouble as well. I see that for both of these fc tasks they ran for many hours and produced many models and you got credits accordingly. As far as I know in-between models are saved so you would have gotten plenty of credit for these if you stopped them mid-way, wouldn't you?

Sarel.

These two tasks ran for about 4 hours, according to the taks details. But they both had been running for more than 7 hours, when I turned off the computer. So they fell back to the last save point, which was near to 4 hours on both tasks, when I turned it back on.
Looking at the computation time, they are giving me trouble, since I have lost 3 hours of work per tasks.
I was suprised about the amount of credits granted on this two tasks, but you can't predict, how much credit is granted for the fc_A_noSmallMvs-tasks:
Low credit:
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=353446268
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=353455781
High credit:
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=353279271

cu Joe
ID: 66956 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Sarel

Send message
Joined: 11 May 06
Posts: 51
Credit: 81,712
RAC: 0
Message 66973 - Posted: 22 Jul 2010, 17:22:07 UTC - in response to Message 66956.  

Hi Joe,

I'm trying to figure out whether these fc tasks are giving you trouble as well. I see that for both of these fc tasks they ran for many hours and produced many models and you got credits accordingly. As far as I know in-between models are saved so you would have gotten plenty of credit for these if you stopped them mid-way, wouldn't you?

Sarel.

These two tasks ran for about 4 hours, according to the taks details. But they both had been running for more than 7 hours, when I turned off the computer. So they fell back to the last save point, which was near to 4 hours on both tasks, when I turned it back on.
Looking at the computation time, they are giving me trouble, since I have lost 3 hours of work per tasks.
I was suprised about the amount of credits granted on this two tasks, but you can't predict, how much credit is granted for the fc_A_noSmallMvs-tasks:
Low credit:
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=353446268
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=353455781
High credit:
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=353279271

cu Joe


Thanks, Joe! We'll next figure out different ways to reduce considerably the number of long-running trajectories. In the meantime, to make sure that you don't lose computing time as you suspend jobs, Mod.Sense's suggestion makes a lot of sense. In the boinc manager, go to Advanced/Preferences, select the "disk and memory usage" tab and check the "leave applications in memory while suspended option".
ID: 66973 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Bikermatt

Send message
Joined: 12 Feb 10
Posts: 20
Credit: 10,552,445
RAC: 0
Message 66974 - Posted: 22 Jul 2010, 17:43:18 UTC

I have noticed that when these protein interface tasks stop check pointing,that when you show graphics the model in progress will have a very high number for the step that it is on.

I have seen tasks that have not check pointed for several hours with a model at over 100k steps.

It seems like when I look at the graphics of a protein interface task that is updating its' checkpoint it is making a model every 500 steps.
ID: 66974 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : simIF2...ProteinInterfaceDesign...-tasks



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org