Message boards : Number crunching : Miscellaneous Work Unit Errors
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 . . . 10 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Kevin Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 21 Credit: 109,496 RAC: 0 |
I had a unit fail with this: <core_client_version>5.3.12.tx36</core_client_version> <message>The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3) </message> Any clue to what caused this error? I think this error may have occurred when I restarted my computer and Rosetta failed to quit so windows just ended the process. Rosetta fails to quit occasionally on both XP and OS X and I end up with an error similar to this. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=11697219 |
darioml Send message Joined: 9 Feb 06 Posts: 1 Credit: 220,203 RAC: 0 |
Hello. I'm using BOINC 5.2.13 in Windows XP SP2 running Rosetta@home 4.82 and SETI@home 4.18 projects. I changed my settings back to stay in memory while preempted, as well as the work unit time fixed to 2 hours, but still most of the Rosetta WUs give errors :( For example these ones this morning: 3/23/2006 9:59:05 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result FA_RLXsc_hom010_1scjB_361_277_0 ( - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)) 3/23/2006 9:59:05 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result FA_RLXop_hom028_1opd__361_296_0 ( - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)) I don't have ANY problems with SETI, except that sometimes the scheduler doesn't respond, but nothing related with the calculation. When this bug will be fixed? When it crashes, sometimes the whole BOINC crashes and XP shows the window to report the problem to Microsoft... Thanks, Dar |
Mike Send message Joined: 21 Dec 05 Posts: 9 Credit: 35,252 RAC: 0 |
Hi. Try turning off all screen savers. I did this 6 days ago with no problems since. |
Bob Guy Send message Joined: 7 Oct 05 Posts: 39 Credit: 24,895 RAC: 0 |
Had this error: 3/23/2006 6:36:47 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result FA_RLXvi_hom027_2vik__362_83_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) Leave in memory = yes This WU was never interrupted - it ran from start to failure without being paused. I was actually eating dinner when this occurred so the computer was otherwise idle. I NEVER use the screensaver or viewed the graphics for this WU. Runs with SETI, SETI Beta, Einstein, Predictor and QAH - no problems with any of the other projects. Other R@H WUs complete normally. System is not overclocked and the temps are mid-range - I don't think the CPU is working very hard. |
dag Send message Joined: 16 Dec 05 Posts: 106 Credit: 1,000,020 RAC: 0 |
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=14511478 15 hours in a slot on an unused laptop overnight - 1.3 hrs cpu time accumulated, ~25% progress. But, this may be progress of a sort as it didn't hang at 1%! dag --Finding aliens is cool, but understanding the structure of proteins is useful. |
Los Alcoholicos~Megaflix Send message Joined: 10 Nov 05 Posts: 24 Credit: 77,199 RAC: 0 |
exit code -1073741819 I seem to have one computer which generates a lot of workunits with above error. Always the same error, but at different moments in the workunit. Maybe the project researchers could look into it. The computer's name in the computer list is Megaflix. It's got at least a 25% failure rate, but it's still climbing. I've installed a fresh Windows, with no software at all. Just for testing I installed only Boinc with Rosetta and it keeps producing the errors. Leave applications in memory has been set to yes since the beginning, so that's not an issue. I had set the work units to run for 2 hours, but since it produced errors almost from the start I set it lower, to 1 hour. It decreased the number of errors just a little bit, but not much. Might be handy in trying to find a cure for this error. I'm willing to use the computer as a testing guinee pig if you want to... |
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
exit code -1073741819 Cab you attach this computer to RALPH. It might help to see those errors over there. Moderator9 ROSETTA@home FAQ Moderator Contact |
Los Alcoholicos~Megaflix Send message Joined: 10 Nov 05 Posts: 24 Credit: 77,199 RAC: 0 |
Ok. I'll finish the outstanding workunits of Rosetta and then I'll connect it to Ralph. |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 22 Dec 05 Posts: 71 Credit: 138,867 RAC: 0 |
Exit status -164 (0xffffff5c) https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=15006663 Rosetta 4.82 Windows Click signature for global team stats |
Los Alcoholicos~Megaflix Send message Joined: 10 Nov 05 Posts: 24 Credit: 77,199 RAC: 0 |
exit code -1073741819 Boinc ran as a service on that computer, so I installed Boinc as a single user installation to see if I could find the source of the errors, while still finishing the few workunits left before connecting to Ralph. However, I haven't had a single error since I'm not running as a service anymore. Re-installing it as a service does give back those errors. Maybe they could look into that? Might be a 'service-related' issue in Boinc? I'll still connect the computer to Ralph (running as a service) after finishing the Rosetta workunits. |
UBT - Timbo Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 20 Credit: 2,299,279 RAC: 357 |
[quoteReport all Work Unit errors on this thread that are NOT - "1%" Hang" "Max Time Exceeded" or other "stuck" or "hung" workuinits [/quote] |
Rom Walton (BOINC) Volunteer moderator Project developer Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 18 Credit: 40,071 RAC: 0 |
Report all Work Unit errors on this thread that are NOT - That error code useally means the machine ran out of memory during the execution of the workunit. Since you only have 512MB of RAM and one instance of Rosetta can use up to 250MB of Ram, I would recommend turning off HT. ----- Rom My Blog |
UBT - Timbo Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 20 Credit: 2,299,279 RAC: 357 |
And I've just had the following errors: Hi, Thanks for the reply. So, in this day and age of service to customers, why doesn't the error message say that? (instead of "exit code -529697949") 2nd: from this page: The minimum spec is: Windows XP CPU: 500MHz or higher HDD space: 200MB Memory: 512MB. Think they need to "tweak" this to state: "PER PROCESS". In the meantime, will go back to crunching for other projects. (edit) All the other projects I crunch for don't have any issues with regards to only having 512Mb of memory...! Oh well..... regards, Tim (Unless some-one's got a spare stick of 512Mb PC2700 memory lying around they might want to donate?) |
rbpeake Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 168 Credit: 247,828 RAC: 0 |
Oh well..... The good news is, extra memory these days is fairly inexpensive... :) Regards, Bob P. |
hugothehermit Send message Joined: 26 Sep 05 Posts: 238 Credit: 314,893 RAC: 0 |
I had a WU error out with a C000005 today P4 3.0GHz 1GB (1022.73 as reported by BOINC) RAM, it's only doing Rosetta@home so no switching. I went to the Your account-> Computers on this account (view account) -> hugo-p3ghz -> results here to find the WU to report it, and found out somehow I'm not effectivly reporting my WU's, I know I've done the WU's before the time has expired. I don't care about the credits but have a look into this as you maybe losing CPU power. I was also going to say (and attach a picture) that the WU that I was doing was constantly doing a full atom relax in the middle of the energy distibution, but I can't remember what the name was though I remember that it was an simple protein that basically was curly curly curly (colours for the strands) that went up down and up again, I actually took three screenshots and saved none of them as I wanted to get the 90 odd % one. It sort of looked like a funnel on top and inverted funnel on the bottom and a wide horizontal line where they met, the full atom relaxes were all in the middle of these "funnels" mutiple edits |
anders n Send message Joined: 19 Sep 05 Posts: 403 Credit: 537,991 RAC: 0 |
I had a WU error out with a c0000005 today It seems to be a WIN 98 issue. I have had this on WIN 98 to. Anders n |
hugothehermit Send message Joined: 26 Sep 05 Posts: 238 Credit: 314,893 RAC: 0 |
t seems to be a WIN 98 issue. I'm on XP, what's more I never knew I was reporting bad results, I just never looked :? |
anders n Send message Joined: 19 Sep 05 Posts: 403 Credit: 537,991 RAC: 0 |
t seems to be a WIN 98 issue. Hi hugotheherit This is one of your results. A win 98 right? https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=15296368 Anders n |
Kevin Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 21 Credit: 109,496 RAC: 0 |
I had a workunit error out with Unrecoverable error for result HIGHERTEMP_HELIX_1elwA_411_81_1 ( - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)) https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=15613409 This unit was at 79781 seconds when this happened. |
Hydnum.Repandum Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 1 Credit: 1,271,991 RAC: 0 |
I have an observation that might help with the errors: I normally run SETI and when this is not available then I run Rosetta. I was running Rosetta very happy for 2 days without any erros (waiting for SETI workunits). Then when SETI started uploading/downloading (very slowley with long queues of retries) I suddenly started having lots of Rosetta w/u failing half way in different machines (about 10 machines running Win XP Profess). This was the error message: 2006-03-29 00:25:42 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result HB_BARCODE_30_1bq9A_351_34656_0 ( - exit code -164 (0xffffff5c)) Thus I conclude that Rosetta has problems when BOINC is busy uploding/downloading/switching to other projects. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Miscellaneous Work Unit Errors
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org