Message boards : Number crunching : Miscellaneous Work Unit Errors
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 . . . 10 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
gaciu Send message Joined: 24 Nov 05 Posts: 2 Credit: 68,626 RAC: 0 |
My WU had an error just when i plugged off my notebook. According to my profile cruching stopped but i didnt expect an error. I tried several times to repeat it, but then everything went smoothly. I suppose it is an BOINC error. Anybody has the same problem? Here is the result: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13924806 |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 22 Dec 05 Posts: 71 Credit: 138,867 RAC: 0 |
Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x7C911E58 read attempt to address 0x3F203FE0 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13935244 Rosetta 4.82 Windows Click signature for global team stats |
Gaff Send message Joined: 18 Mar 06 Posts: 1 Credit: 2,865 RAC: 0 |
New user here. Ran about 4 work units on my computer and keep getting error messages like this: 3/18/2006 5:13:44 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HB_BARCODE_30_1c9oA_351_13884_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) Any advice? I read through the FAQs page, but remain perplexed. If I cannot get an answer, I will probably bail on this project for the time being and just run SETI and Predictor. thanks. |
anders n Send message Joined: 19 Sep 05 Posts: 403 Credit: 537,991 RAC: 0 |
New user here. Ran about 4 work units on my computer and keep getting error messages like this: Read the FAQ about keeping work in memory. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=669#10374 Anders n |
Rom Walton (BOINC) Volunteer moderator Project developer Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 18 Credit: 40,071 RAC: 0 |
|
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 7 Oct 05 Posts: 234 Credit: 15,020 RAC: 0 |
Rosetta WU crash due to Ralph testing. Reported here: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/forum_thread.php?id=4#914 And before anybody wants to post that Rosetta requires to stay in memory while preempted, let me show you David Kim's answer to that question: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/forum_thread.php?id=4#407 [b]"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me[/b] |
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 7 Oct 05 Posts: 234 Credit: 15,020 RAC: 0 |
Happened again! Rosetta WU crash due to Ralph testing. Reported here: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/forum_thread.php?id=4#918 Moderator 8 or 9 or whatever, will you please create a thread, where we, who are testing WU's over at Ralph can report our crashed Rosetta WU's due to Ralph testing. And I'm changing back to keep WU's in memory while preempted, untill the devs have fixed this bug. And I really hope they'll grant me the claimed credit for the crashed Rosetta WU's. [b]"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me[/b] |
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
|
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 7 Oct 05 Posts: 234 Credit: 15,020 RAC: 0 |
For those who may be interested, Rom has posted information about Rosetta Work Unit errors and the status of the ongoing work to fix the bugs in Rosetta/Ralph on his "Blog". Yes, but he doesn't mention the "stay in memory or crash" bug. [b]"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me[/b] |
Rom Walton (BOINC) Volunteer moderator Project developer Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 18 Credit: 40,071 RAC: 0 |
Ummmmm, that is the bug, or rather the manifestation of the bug that you are seeing. The bug I fixed is the stay in memory or crash bug. ----- Rom ----- Rom My Blog |
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Ummmmm, that is the bug, or rather the manifestation of the bug that you are seeing. Rom, The problem is many people running Ralph are also running Rosetta. The latest Ralph app has not yet been deployed in Rosetta. So when people remove the application to run Ralph, this impacts their Rossetta work adversely. What they really need is guidance on how to run Ralph under these conditions. Moderator9 ROSETTA@home FAQ Moderator Contact |
Rom Walton (BOINC) Volunteer moderator Project developer Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 18 Credit: 40,071 RAC: 0 |
Ummmmm, that is the bug, or rather the manifestation of the bug that you are seeing. I wish I had a good answer for ya, all I can say is this issue will become a thing of the past over the next day or two. ----- Rom My Blog |
Mike Send message Joined: 21 Dec 05 Posts: 9 Credit: 35,252 RAC: 0 |
Hi . My first post. Having seemingly to have got past the 1% bug. (turned off all screen savers). I have now noticed a'Client error' problem when checking my results. Almost 50% have this error. Any ideas.?? |
anders n Send message Joined: 19 Sep 05 Posts: 403 Credit: 537,991 RAC: 0 |
Hi . My first post. Having seemingly to have got past the 1% bug. (turned off all screen savers). I have now noticed a'Client error' problem when checking my results. Almost 50% have this error. Any ideas.?? Read the FAQ about keeping work in memory. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=669#10374 Anders n |
Mike Send message Joined: 21 Dec 05 Posts: 9 Credit: 35,252 RAC: 0 |
Hi All. My first post. I need to know why 50% of my results have a client error ?? |
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Hi All. My first post. I need to know why 50% of my results have a client error ?? You may have more than one problem, but on one of your systems the errors seem to consistently occur at about 3400 seconds. You might try setting you prefs to "keep application in memory" to YES. You also seem to have some errors related to missing files. These may be download issues. You also have some that are memory violations. These too could be the setting mentioned above, but they could also be the amount of systems memory you have available. Please take a look a t the FAQs for explanations of some of the setting currently used to run the project. Moderator9 ROSETTA@home FAQ Moderator Contact |
STE\/E Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 125 Credit: 4,100,301 RAC: 114 |
I have a weird one going right now on 1 Computer. I have my Preferences set to run the WU's in 2 Hours & most of the WU's do run in that amount of Time give or take 10-15 Minutes. But this one has been running for 4:22:30 now & only showing 38.71% done, at least it is showing some progress so I guess I'll just have to see what happens with it ... :) |
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 7 Oct 05 Posts: 234 Credit: 15,020 RAC: 0 |
I have a weird one going right now on 1 Computer. I have my Preferences set to run the WU's in 2 Hours & most of the WU's do run in that amount of Time give or take 10-15 Minutes. Poorboy, I had one running for hours and with a very slow almost invisible progress, and when I opened the graphic to see if it was dead, I saw a huge protein! And I could see it moved rapidly and the steps incremented very slowly, so I guess it had to run through a lot of foldings, as it was so big. I should have taken a screendump of it, but I didn't. But it was the biggest, I've ever seen. So maybe it's one of those giants, you have got? [b]"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me[/b] |
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 7 Oct 05 Posts: 234 Credit: 15,020 RAC: 0 |
Ummmmm, that is the bug, or rather the manifestation of the bug that you are seeing. Thanks Rom. I'm sure you'll let us know as soon you have found out something. :-) Anyway, I've changed my settings back to stay in memory while preempted, and I won't change it before you give us a signal that it's ok to do. [b]"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me[/b] |
nairb Send message Joined: 8 Dec 05 Posts: 17 Credit: 990,147 RAC: 0 |
been getting more wu failing at the end of processing. A reboot did not solve it. The machine is only crunching rosy. 3/22/06 12:54:34 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result FA_RLXig_hom019_1ig5A_360_492_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) 2006-03-20 02:37:31 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result HB_BARCODE_30_1pgx__351_7954_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) 2006-03-19 06:05:28 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result FA_RLXig_hom010_1ig5A_360_230_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) 2006-03-20 20:22:06 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result HB_BARCODE_30_1iibA_351_11198_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) etc..... Might check the machine with other projects. It has run seti before without any problems. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Miscellaneous Work Unit Errors
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org