Suggestions for improvement thread

Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Suggestions for improvement thread

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Profile Kevin
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Oct 07
Posts: 5
Credit: 20,436
RAC: 0
Message 48399 - Posted: 5 Nov 2007, 21:54:48 UTC

When i look at the home page of R@H, 90% of the "Users of the Day" are inactive members, having 0 RAC. I think the site could gain a bit of interest for its members if they perhaps had a greater chance of being noted due to their activity? Just an idea.
ID: 48399 · Rating: 2 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Luuklag

Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 07
Posts: 262
Credit: 4,171
RAC: 0
Message 48423 - Posted: 6 Nov 2007, 16:22:24 UTC - in response to Message 48399.  

When i look at the home page of R@H, 90% of the "Users of the Day" are inactive members, having 0 RAC. I think the site could gain a bit of interest for its members if they perhaps had a greater chance of being noted due to their activity? Just an idea.



you can vote at a profile to become user of the day, its a button on the bottom of the page the user with the most votes becomes user of the day.
ID: 48423 · Rating: 1 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
buren

Send message
Joined: 18 Nov 07
Posts: 21
Credit: 132,158
RAC: 0
Message 48872 - Posted: 20 Nov 2007, 18:25:25 UTC

I posted this in an own thread already, because I didn't know such an improvemtn thread did exist.

So here's my suggestion again:

If I did uderstand the experiment right, currently what we do is not actually discovering the structure of a proteine, but checking if the model is capable of doing so.

So it'd be interesting to be able to see if the model currently running got close to the real data by displaying the known lowest energy. Maybe even the percentage already reached.

Also it'd be nice if in the RMSD window the zero line was marked. So one could easily how close to the real one the model works.


And btw, does anyone know how the project is doing? Any chance of getting to predict real structures anytime soon? I read the journal but there's lots of entries and hard to find what I was looking for.
ID: 48872 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Suggestions for improvement thread



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org