Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Suggestions for improvement thread
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
Kevin Send message Joined: 20 Oct 07 Posts: 5 Credit: 20,436 RAC: 0 |
When i look at the home page of R@H, 90% of the "Users of the Day" are inactive members, having 0 RAC. I think the site could gain a bit of interest for its members if they perhaps had a greater chance of being noted due to their activity? Just an idea. |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
When i look at the home page of R@H, 90% of the "Users of the Day" are inactive members, having 0 RAC. I think the site could gain a bit of interest for its members if they perhaps had a greater chance of being noted due to their activity? Just an idea. you can vote at a profile to become user of the day, its a button on the bottom of the page the user with the most votes becomes user of the day. |
buren Send message Joined: 18 Nov 07 Posts: 21 Credit: 132,158 RAC: 0 |
I posted this in an own thread already, because I didn't know such an improvemtn thread did exist. So here's my suggestion again: If I did uderstand the experiment right, currently what we do is not actually discovering the structure of a proteine, but checking if the model is capable of doing so. So it'd be interesting to be able to see if the model currently running got close to the real data by displaying the known lowest energy. Maybe even the percentage already reached. Also it'd be nice if in the RMSD window the zero line was marked. So one could easily how close to the real one the model works. And btw, does anyone know how the project is doing? Any chance of getting to predict real structures anytime soon? I read the journal but there's lots of entries and hard to find what I was looking for. |
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Suggestions for improvement thread
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org