Results seem "stuck" at 15

Questions and Answers : Windows : Results seem "stuck" at 15

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
ten2the17th

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 06
Posts: 2
Credit: 42,495
RAC: 0
Message 19371 - Posted: 27 Jun 2006, 20:40:19 UTC

I currently have only one machine set up, running Rosetta 100% 24/7 since 6/07/06. The credits seem to be coming through fine a couple times a day (average turnaround time is .65 days) but the results always show 15. I know for sure the machine has done probably twice that may WU's. Not necessarily a big deal, just curious.
ID: 19371 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Christoph Jansen
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 06
Posts: 248
Credit: 267,153
RAC: 0
Message 19375 - Posted: 27 Jun 2006, 21:34:20 UTC

Hi,

ten2the17th, and welcome aboard.

All projects try to avoid any server load that is unnecessary. Massive directory loads have troubled SETI more than once. In the case of Rosetta, it would be unnecessary to keep them on disk for a longer time than about a week, as there are no results to check yours against [like in Seti@home with their initial replication of 4 identical WUs]. That gives you enough time to look at them once in a while and then they are deleted. Keeps the system lean and fast.


Regards,

Christoph
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant." R.M. Nixon
ID: 19375 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
ten2the17th

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 06
Posts: 2
Credit: 42,495
RAC: 0
Message 19414 - Posted: 28 Jun 2006, 14:02:15 UTC - in response to Message 19375.  

Hi,

ten2the17th, and welcome aboard.

All projects try to avoid any server load that is unnecessary. Massive directory loads have troubled SETI more than once. In the case of Rosetta, it would be unnecessary to keep them on disk for a longer time than about a week, as there are no results to check yours against [like in Seti@home with their initial replication of 4 identical WUs]. That gives you enough time to look at them once in a while and then they are deleted. Keeps the system lean and fast.


Regards,

Christoph

ID: 19414 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Questions and Answers : Windows : Results seem "stuck" at 15



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org