1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Team Points STOLEN!!!!! Over 6 Million Points!
(Message 54279)
Posted 8 Jul 2008 by Morphy375 Post: I don't know what could have caused this. I think the team founder has the ability to change the team name and remove members. Does anyone know who the Teddies founder was before the switch? Why should we all have moved out at the same moment on feb 15th 2008? Have a look here http://www.boincsynergy.com/stats/team-movements.php?project=rah&team=559 and then look at your database.... |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Team Points STOLEN!!!!! Over 6 Million Points!
(Message 54239)
Posted 7 Jul 2008 by Morphy375 Post: The BOINC server code wouldn't reuse a team number.... would it? Team number was 559 according to my old link at boincstats... |
3)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Find-a-Drug Refugees
(Message 31184)
Posted 15 Nov 2006 by Morphy375 Post: I had my Rosetta birthday already..... |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
A Challenge
(Message 23964)
Posted 20 Aug 2006 by Morphy375 Post: Optimized clients are not relevant, Movieman stated the new credit system would be used. Let's not rehash how or why the optimized app came to be. Now I think You are overreacting Ethan.... I didn't use any offending words. Movieman, I have no probs with unhiding my crunchers. I did hide them because there are a lot of "dead" crunchers listed. At home I do TSC and at work I have 9 Sempron 2800+ crunching Rosetta under LTSP. |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
A Challenge
(Message 23957)
Posted 20 Aug 2006 by Morphy375 Post: Huch.... Why is was deleted? |
6)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
DISCUSSION of Rosetta@home Journal (2)
(Message 23937)
Posted 20 Aug 2006 by Morphy375 Post: [quote]we will NOT be backdating credit totals I disagree! And now? ;-)) |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Newly built 5.4.10 optimized windows boinc client
(Message 21623)
Posted 2 Aug 2006 by Morphy375 Post:
YES
NO :) |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Newly built 5.4.10 optimized windows boinc client
(Message 21617)
Posted 2 Aug 2006 by Morphy375 Post:
It doesn't matter whether I'm a nice teammate or not... And if my english is to bad (again) how do You call it what I call cheating? Legal action because some (many) are able to install a Boinc client others can't because they have no time or skills to do so? What means "allowed by the project leaders"? Are they able to allow or deny by words and force us to do something? No... They want the work done and don't want people to leave if they forbid optimized clients. And to make my point clear: Why should others get more credits for the same work done? The same work! So please proove to me that an optimized client makes the results of Rosetta better or has any other useful implementation for the science and I'll apologize... At TSC it is possible to crunch 2000 WU's in a bunker and then upload the results again and again to push the stats. It must be legal because the project leaders aren't able to do something against it in the short run. How would You call people doing this? And now back to work.... |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Newly built 5.4.10 optimized windows boinc client
(Message 21574)
Posted 1 Aug 2006 by Morphy375 Post:
No, it's the truth..... Getting more credits for the same work by using "optimized clients" than others using the normal clients is cheating. That's a fact and not a lie.... |
10)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
CAN YOU HELP ROSETTA??
(Message 12414)
Posted 21 Mar 2006 by Morphy375 Post: Hello, Dutch Power Cows..... |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Serverproblems ?
(Message 11247)
Posted 23 Feb 2006 by Morphy375 Post: Only 7000 WU's left.... Server problems? |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Computation Error
(Message 11212)
Posted 22 Feb 2006 by Morphy375 Post: I have several machines with 256MB running Rosetta without any problems..... |
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Internet traffic and necessary data
(Message 10212)
Posted 30 Jan 2006 by Morphy375 Post: |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Who is the official tech here
(Message 9744)
Posted 25 Jan 2006 by Morphy375 Post: It may have something to do with growing pains - a sudden increase in participants will stress any project. (And DO NOT read anything team- or user-specific into that statement - I am NOT pointing fingers!) Dr. Baker wanted the crunchers from FAD with their power and he got the power.... So it's his problem to keep the crunching customer satisfied.... But for days now there's silence in the forest regarding the staff..... |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Who is the official tech here
(Message 9604)
Posted 22 Jan 2006 by Morphy375 Post: Would that be the 14 "Teddies" or the other 36,800+ customers? At least the Teddies... ;-)) And I don't care much about the other 36,800 customers? ... If they want to behave like stupid crunching cattle it's their choice... BTW My English is known as pretty bad but I translate customer to "Kunde/Verbraucher". If You think that we are customers in this meaning You're on the wrong lane. I don't need them but they need me/us to do the job. I'm only customer of the software they provide. Here's an idea - why don't YOU contribute by writing a better forum, fully integrated with the BOINC software, and submit it to the dev mailing list for consideration as the standard? If your idea has the merit, it should be considered, yes? Do you need the links to the open-source repository? I need no links, thanks. But why should I? For sure I can do the job because it's my profession but I see no need to take another burden on my spare free time.... |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Who is the official tech here
(Message 9598)
Posted 22 Jan 2006 by Morphy375 Post: I'm glad You're not from the staff Angus. So please let the staff decide what to do.... (Just remembering an old song: "Keep the customer satisfied") |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Who is the official tech here
(Message 9596)
Posted 22 Jan 2006 by Morphy375 Post: To make it short: Whether it is standard forum or not, I don't like it. So please improve this one as suggested or take another one. And I have no problems to register twice.... And I'm wondering why some people here try to speak for the staff but not from the staff.... |
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Who is the official tech here
(Message 9477)
Posted 20 Jan 2006 by Morphy375 Post:
I didn't rant. I just stated a fact and why. And I said that I'll be back when the new servers are online. And I do only one project at a time. And it's my legal right to state facts, make suggestions and rant about this forum style. So where's Your problem? |
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Who is the official tech here
(Message 9469)
Posted 20 Jan 2006 by Morphy375 Post: Thanks Scribe and carl.h, When I get some time soon, I will come up with some titles and post them up for comments before making them official. I left Rosetta (for a while) because 20 out of 30+ machines were out of work yesterday morning.... |
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Internet traffic and necessary data
(Message 9301)
Posted 18 Jan 2006 by Morphy375 Post: Sad news hob, really sad news.... :-(( |
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org