|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
what about using CUDA for calculations?
(Message 53369)
Posted 27 May 2008 by popandbob Post:
WHAT?!?!!? Wow thats good to hear! Finally I'll be able to use my GPU for something other than graphics/games! ~BoB |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
what about using CUDA for calculations?
(Message 53135)
Posted 18 May 2008 by popandbob Post:
Folding@home does not use CUDA. They are trying to build a one app fits all for the GPU which currently is not possible due to their differences. I remember reading somewhere that until Nvidia support and return accurate results with this method they use they will not use Nvidia GPU's. Folding@home's biggest limitation is the use of directx for their GPU clients. This causes the need for 1 core/cpu to be used to supply the GPU. ~BoB |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta v1.19 bug thread
(Message 53059)
Posted 14 May 2008 by popandbob Post: 3 errors... Error 1 <core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 36000 # cpu_run_time_pref: 36000 ERROR: Conformation: fold_tree nres should match size ERROR:: Exit from: ....srccoreconformationConformation.cc line: 192 called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> error2 <core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR: unrecognized atom_type_name HOH ERROR:: Exit from: c:cygwinhomeboincboinc_buildminirosetta_1.19minisrccore/chemical/AtomTypeSet.hh line: 79 called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> error 3 core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005) </message> <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 36000 Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x005C3030 write attempt to address 0x00000004 Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger... |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Why no R@h work downloading? I also run SETI
(Message 45663)
Posted 1 Sep 2007 by popandbob Post: 9/1/2007 12:01:45 PM|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user 9/1/2007 12:01:45 PM|rosetta@home|Requesting 1 seconds of new work 9/1/2007 12:01:51 PM|rosetta@home|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 509] 9/1/2007 12:01:51 PM|rosetta@home|Deferring communication for 2 hr 5 min 26 sec 9/1/2007 12:01:51 PM|rosetta@home|Reason: no work from project been going on for the past week... thankfully the other projects have held up... BoB |
©2026 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org