Posts by [B^S] Dr. Bill Skiba

1) Message boards : Number crunching : Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.22 (Message 19241)
Posted 24 Jun 2006 by Profile [B^S] Dr. Bill Skiba
Post:
Just aborted this work unit.

http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=25006316

Stuck at 1hr 7min - suspened and resumed several times to no avail. Next work Rosetta work unit seems to be running normally.

rosetta 5.22
windows 2K
athlon xp 2500 barton
2) Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : What is the difference between all these protein related projects? (Message 12730)
Posted 27 Mar 2006 by Profile [B^S] Dr. Bill Skiba
Post:
Does anyone know where tne new project Tanpaku fits into this puzzle? Is it looking at folding in a different light?
3) Message boards : Number crunching : 27.70 credit granted from 10 (ten) hours work (Message 11613)
Posted 3 Mar 2006 by Profile [B^S] Dr. Bill Skiba
Post:
Thank you, David.
4) Message boards : Number crunching : 27.70 credit granted from 10 (ten) hours work (Message 11549)
Posted 2 Mar 2006 by Profile [B^S] Dr. Bill Skiba
Post:
I had the same kind of thing happen this evening. http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=6346111

Perhaps this may be related to the new variable work unit length?

For instance, if host "a" misses a deadline aor errors out and the wu is resent to hosts "b" and "c" what happens if host "b" has a work unit length of 2 hours and returns a result getting x number of credits. Then host "c", which has a work unit length of 8 hours returns a result also. Why should "c" receive the same credit as "b"?

Is this in fact the way the system works?
5) Message boards : Number crunching : exceed max cpu time (Message 7989)
Posted 30 Dec 2005 by Profile [B^S] Dr. Bill Skiba
Post:
Had a number of units fail quickly over the holidays, no big deal. This one after 55.8k sec processing time due to max cpu time exceeded: wu id 4259223 result 5303713 name NO_RANDOM_WTS_OR_FRAGS_1dtj_223_2869






©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org