1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.22
(Message 19241)
Posted 24 Jun 2006 by [B^S] Dr. Bill Skiba Post: Just aborted this work unit. http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=25006316 Stuck at 1hr 7min - suspened and resumed several times to no avail. Next work Rosetta work unit seems to be running normally. rosetta 5.22 windows 2K athlon xp 2500 barton |
2)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
What is the difference between all these protein related projects?
(Message 12730)
Posted 27 Mar 2006 by [B^S] Dr. Bill Skiba Post: Does anyone know where tne new project Tanpaku fits into this puzzle? Is it looking at folding in a different light? |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
27.70 credit granted from 10 (ten) hours work
(Message 11613)
Posted 3 Mar 2006 by [B^S] Dr. Bill Skiba Post: Thank you, David. |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
27.70 credit granted from 10 (ten) hours work
(Message 11549)
Posted 2 Mar 2006 by [B^S] Dr. Bill Skiba Post: I had the same kind of thing happen this evening. http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=6346111 Perhaps this may be related to the new variable work unit length? For instance, if host "a" misses a deadline aor errors out and the wu is resent to hosts "b" and "c" what happens if host "b" has a work unit length of 2 hours and returns a result getting x number of credits. Then host "c", which has a work unit length of 8 hours returns a result also. Why should "c" receive the same credit as "b"? Is this in fact the way the system works? |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
exceed max cpu time
(Message 7989)
Posted 30 Dec 2005 by [B^S] Dr. Bill Skiba Post: Had a number of units fail quickly over the holidays, no big deal. This one after 55.8k sec processing time due to max cpu time exceeded: wu id 4259223 result 5303713 name NO_RANDOM_WTS_OR_FRAGS_1dtj_223_2869 |
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org