21)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
FreeBSD 6.0 - unknown platform
(Message 6892)
Posted 20 Dec 2005 by Desti Post: Rosetta does currently not support *BSD. http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/apps.php Maybe you could try the linux application with the anonymous plattform support. |
22)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
client for AMD64 X2 ??
(Message 6183)
Posted 13 Dec 2005 by Desti Post: Bill. What is the statistical likelyhood that a copy of the app_info.xml from a P4 machine running Linux would help? The app_info.xml is not automaticly generated or downloaded, it's a selfmade file for selfmade applications. |
23)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
client for AMD64 X2 ??
(Message 6159)
Posted 13 Dec 2005 by Desti Post: Hi, you can a) simply use a 32 Bit binary of BOINC b) read this: http://boinc-doc.net/boinc-wiki/index.php?title=Found_app_info.xml%3B_using_anonymous_platform http://boinc-doc.net/boinc-wiki/index.php?title=BOINC_Anonymous_Platform_Mechanism |
24)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
Won't upload WU
(Message 4838)
Posted 30 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: There is no x86_64 application, you need to use a x86 BOINC client or read this http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=301#4781 |
25)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
AMD64 Support?
(Message 3929)
Posted 22 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: I'd think it would be nice to have 64bit versions. As the application is pretty new I would expect that this shouldn't be much work, but basically be a recompile only. Most applications don't benefit from the 64 bit adress space, but from the ability to use more registers in the 64bit modus (for example media encoding) http://www.linuxhardware.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/24/1747228&mode=thread |
26)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
Some errors with 4.77
(Message 3927)
Posted 22 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: Hmm... All of a sudden it works... It's cold today, maybe you should check your cooling ;-) |
27)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is there a Solaris application in the works?
(Message 3762)
Posted 20 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: there will be no sooner a solaris version (due to lack of equipment when i remember correctly) than the source code is made available, which was delayed due to cheating issues. you might watch the "opening the source code" (out of my head, might be named slightly different) thread to get the latest news. http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=349 ;-) |
28)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
cannot attach client to rosetta project
(Message 3761)
Posted 20 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: hmmm...courious, is this your system you wanna attach? http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/hosts_user.php?userid=10139 Try to attach with boinc: boinc -attach_project http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta YOUR_ACCOUNT_KEY |
29)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
Some errors with 4.77
(Message 3635)
Posted 18 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: Do you use the self made Gentoo BOINC or the official binary? Right. But this "execv: Text file busy" doesn't look like a typical Rosetta error. For the glibc errors, what CFLAGS do you use for your system? |
30)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
Some errors with 4.77
(Message 3621)
Posted 18 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: Do you use the self made Gentoo BOINC or the official binary? |
31)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Processor Speeds
(Message 3343)
Posted 15 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: Isn't the celeron M based on the pentium m core? If so, it's closer to the amd archetecture (shorter pipeline) than the p4. The pentium m does more work per mhz than the p4, just like the modern amd chips. That's right. The Celeron M is a Pentium M with half L2 cache size and some less power saving steppings. |
32)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
code release and redundancy
(Message 2789)
Posted 10 Nov 2005 by Desti Post:
Sounds good. What license will Rosetta use? |
33)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
Unstoppable Rosetta client...
(Message 2764)
Posted 9 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: Sounds like Rosetta wents into a zombie process. |
34)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Linux vs Windows point awards
(Message 2718)
Posted 9 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: An interesting thread on the seti boards: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=22079 That'a good idea. I hope they will introduce it soon. :-) |
35)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Congrats to the rest of Free-DC for hitting #1 team spot
(Message 2603)
Posted 7 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: Wooooohaaaa! We are...erm...nearly close behind you. |
36)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
WU's fail with several error codes
(Message 2506)
Posted 6 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: Take a look into the BOINC Wiki http://boinc-doc.net/boinc-wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page |
37)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Find a Drug is heading this way!
(Message 2390)
Posted 6 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: Welcome to Rosetta and have fun! |
38)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Linux vs Windows point awards
(Message 2012)
Posted 1 Nov 2005 by Desti Post: Yea, this subject has pretty much been beaten to death. That's true, but normaly the validation process gives the Linuxers mostly more credits than they claimed for. Rosetta has no validation against Windows(tm) crunchers, so there is no credit mixing. |
39)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
Unstoppable Rosetta client...
(Message 1912)
Posted 29 Oct 2005 by Desti Post: Do you use BOINC 4 or 5? |
40)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New type of WU?
(Message 1644)
Posted 23 Oct 2005 by Desti Post: Three point WU anyone? 2.20 |
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org