21)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
"Concerned my P.C. isnot well"
(Message 11958)
Posted 12 Mar 2006 by Doug Worrall Post: Hello Darren,James and Dimitris, As it stands I only can crunch for 2 experiments now.Somehow I meesed-up the O.V. and Boinc crashe several times.Now to start Boinc,I must go to home. "Conquerer" and hold down CNTL click the run Client go to tools and execute the shell.Then I have to repeat the same to get the Boinc Manager operational. All my Malaria w/u failed,but, Einstein and Rosetta still work and am getting better Credits than ever.I may have to do a Complete install of this O.S. Unless you can Delete all Boinc files and reaaply them???? Have been asking these questions at my team page,but feel the non action from them is basically R.T.F.M.{never have been helped there} assides from the Originator of the Team and a couple of people that run Windows. Mosr run multiple P.C,s and I guess have sort of a "clique",This may be the end of there Non-action.Thank-you personnel and scientists and crunchers at rosetta. Be Well Sincerely Doug Worrall |
22)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
"Concerned my P.C. isnot well"
(Message 11908)
Posted 11 Mar 2006 by Doug Worrall Post: In addition to previous posters' help, depending on your version of Linux, you could download an installable package, e.g. for Debian and the like http://wiki.debian.org/BOINC Thanks Dimitris, Valubale info from all of you.I consider Rosetta my Premeire experiment due to the great threads and moderators,crunchers and hands-on with the "Scientists,Too-Cool." Sincerely Doug Sluger Worrall |
23)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
"Concerned my P.C. isnot well"
(Message 11879)
Posted 11 Mar 2006 by Doug Worrall Post: Have looked at those "Optimised Clients",and,It is a bit above my knowledge. Thanks Darren, I beleive I can do this myself with the help you just offered me {Thak-You} I downloaded Boinc 2.213 myself so cannot see too much a problem.I called the New Boinc/Doinc and poof/it overwrote Doinc with Boinc.I will read your post a few yimes,will go to those URL,s and study which client I prefer.I usually dowmload to Desktop,Cut,Paste in Home.Make the shell executable and "Doinc",LOL. I like your way though.Just rebooted and ran Bechmarks again.This time I did nothing.Usually I look around Boinc Manager clicking this and that.Not this time.Also disabled kgreml but forgot Linux weather. Thank you again Darren,I have mostly done all this Boinc stuff myself with out much help.Just downloaded another Rosetta w/u.Recieved 6 points dor 2 hours of Crunching.{That is all I do with my P.C.}Run Boinc and Email.That is why I am dissapointed. Sincerely Doug* |
24)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
"Concerned my P.C. isnot well"
(Message 11877)
Posted 11 Mar 2006 by Doug Worrall Post: Doug, your benchmarks seem a bit low for your cpu from others I've seen, but I'm not all that up on what different cpu's should be giving so I could be wrong. Thanks Darren, I am running LINUXOS 9.1 with KDE 3.5?Any ways I benchmarked when I reapplied a 4GB kernel for a test and it fubarred the Benchmarks.Have reapplyied the 1Gb kernel and ran Bencmarks.Have looked at those "Optimised Clients",and,It is a bit above my knowledge.But my Bud that runs the same system set the swap spaces for me and he knows nill about Boinc,but,with those URL,s you gave me I will send to him to read and maybe by setting Boinc-up with a Command line through a Cosole instead of just the executable way will be besdt also.Run Boinc is User instead of Root due to problems I could cause as a newbie.But this is good.I like trying what is best,and,feel imbaressed sometimes bugging my Teamates. Thank you again Darren and "Happy Crunching" Sincerely Doug Worrall |
25)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
"Concerned my P.C. isnot well"
(Message 11874)
Posted 11 Mar 2006 by Doug Worrall Post: Hello, If this can be of any help. Sincerly Doug* Computer information IP address Show IP address Domain name localhost Local Standard Time UTC -6 hours Name localhost Created 3 Mar 2006 14:58:40 UTC Total Credit 3,367.98 Recent average credit 22.39 CPU type GenuineIntel Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.40GHz Number of CPUs 1 Operating System Linux 2.6.13-oci2.mdk-i586-up-1GB Memory 749.2 MB Cache 256 KB Swap space 1239.35 MB Total disk space 30 GB Free Disk Space 29.5 GB Measured floating point speed 378.68 million ops/sec Measured integer speed 1001.41 million ops/sec Average upload rate Unknown Average download rate Unknown Average turnaround time 0.32 days Maximum daily WU quota per CPU 100/day Results 16 Number of times client has contacted server 39 Last time contacted server 11 Mar 2006 1:44:32 UTC % of time BOINC client is running 98.1219 % While BOINC running, % of time host has an Internet connection -100 % While BOINC running, % of time work is allowed 99.9857 % Average CPU efficiency 0.948428 Result duration correction factor 0.460462 Location Click to merge this computer |
26)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
"Concerned my P.C. isnot well"
(Message 11873)
Posted 11 Mar 2006 by Doug Worrall Post: |
27)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
"dissapointed"{new kernel}
(Message 11728)
Posted 6 Mar 2006 by Doug Worrall Post: Hello, Have installed a new kernel in my system{linux} a 4gb one from a 1gb one.Was ,receiving relatively good scores,Below is the new resuts,should I go back to the 1kb kernel? Rosetta@home Results for user UW Seal [ Home ] [ Join ] [ About ] [ Participants ] [ Community ] [ Statistics ] [ login/out ] explain CPU time (sec) claimed credit granted credit 12680249 9428299 6 Mar 2006 13:09:24 UTC 13 Mar 2006 13:09:24 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- --- 12614195 10122958 5 Mar 2006 23:44:04 UTC 6 Mar 2006 13:00:09 UTC Over Success Done 7,150.81 5.44 5.44 12604701 10114529 5 Mar 2006 22:19:09 UTC 5 Mar 2006 23:44:04 UTC Over Client error Computing 270.47 0.21 --- 12565996 10079656 5 Mar 2006 13:07:35 UTC 5 Mar 2006 22:11:34 UTC Over Success Done 6,319.62 4.81 4.81 12499825 10020792 4 Mar 2006 8:03:50 UTC 4 Mar 2006 12:42:23 UTC Over Client error Computing 1,111.53 1.44 --- 12499327 10020322 5 Mar 2006 3:21:54 UTC 5 Mar 2006 11:09:59 UTC Over Success Done 7,214.36 5.49 5.49 12458289 9980066 4 Mar 2006 19:39:14 UTC 5 Mar 2006 0:42:06 UTC Over Success Done 6,666.69 5.29 5.29 12433098 9955380 4 Mar 2006 12:42:23 UTC 4 Mar 2006 19:39:14 UTC Over Success Done 7,087.65 9.16 9.16 12410992 9933802 4 Mar 2006 3:15:42 UTC 4 Mar 2006 10:27:57 UTC Over Success Done 6,267.16 8.10 8.10 12388360 9911612 3 Mar 2006 22:45:32 UTC 4 Mar 2006 3:15:42 UTC Over Success Done 6,809.92 8.80 8.80 12354540 9887015 3 Mar 2006 15:56:10 UTC 3 Mar 2006 21:44:07 UTC Over Success Done 6,826.04 8.82 8.82 12349714 9882304 3 Mar 2006 14:58:40 UTC 3 Mar 2006 15:56:10 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 --- Sincerely Doug Sluger Worrall |
28)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
I'm a novice^^
(Message 11696)
Posted 6 Mar 2006 by Doug Worrall Post: Hello There, If you have the time,go thru the threads and read all the news on the main Page. This is where you will learn much.Just donnot quit Boinc in the middle of a w/u,even if you have "saved in memeory" tab checked in your "Prefereneces." It {may} wreck that w/u. All the Posts from Moderators,Scietists and crunchers have a wealth of info regarding this Experiment. "Happy Crunching" Doug Sluger Worrall |
29)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
I'm a novice^^
(Message 11628)
Posted 4 Mar 2006 by Doug Worrall Post: Welcome Andy74, The Boinc world.You are off to a great start by crunching for Rosetta. The staff,scientists,Forum moderators are "Hands-on" and Informative,{compared- to other experiments}. Now the w/u are 2 hours and I am very happy.Thank-you Rosetta and Enjoy being a Boincateer Andy. Sincerely Doug Worrall |
30)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Humor in the work?
(Message 8382)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by Doug Worrall Post: "No_Sim_aneal {poisoning?} HeJE |
31)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Humor in the work?
(Message 8271)
Posted 3 Jan 2006 by Doug Worrall Post: just increased Rosey too 200% share and now I get "increase_Cycles",and something "Scietific",It is!My Bet. Doug |
32)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Humor in the work?
(Message 8187)
Posted 2 Jan 2006 by Doug Worrall Post: Thank-You All, I get it,dohh,Now will crunch even more,good for a laugh! Doug Worrall |
33)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Humor in the work?
(Message 7751)
Posted 27 Dec 2005 by Doug Worrall Post: This last one is just great.LOL The W/U name is:MORE_FRAGS_WITH_BARCODE:Great stuff,may keep crunching untill they stop being funny.I thought a Hacker got to Boinc and was changing the names and that is why I cam here to "Investigate".LOL Good one guys,you need some time-off anyways. When you get back from Holidays "Hope" you can tell Me a dummy the Meaning of them Sincerely Doug Worrall |
34)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Humor in the work?
(Message 7748)
Posted 27 Dec 2005 by Doug Worrall Post: I am crunching one right now,that is why I am here. Nearly done a real cool named one.Cannot see full name till complete.LOL |
35)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Humor in the work?
(Message 7733)
Posted 27 Dec 2005 by Doug Worrall Post: I am crunching one right now,that is why I am here. The last 3 w/u had weird/great names.Should have written them down.I was Flabergasted.They were all very funny and I am sure the Moderators will tell us some more names.I can go look back at the old w/u. See Ya Doug Here are the "Other" funny w/u,now I get-it,dohh. "NO BARRCODE FRAGS" and "NO MORE RELAX CYCLES" good ones guys. Doug Worrall |
36)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
client for AMD64 X2 ??
(Message 6070)
Posted 13 Dec 2005 by Doug Worrall Post: Hello, Am running Linux from the Live Distro for 6 Months.Fedora am not sure of. Hope you are not in Root ,that could be a problem,but,also,I have been unable to get work either.Rosey was down for a bit today so that could be part and parcel of the problem with the "rejection" Good Luck Boinc Wiki does have great info for Linux users,all the way from installing all these new Boincs,LOL am at 5.??? I forget. Sincerly Doug Worrall Boinc Synergy |
37)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
lag time
(Message 5664)
Posted 9 Dec 2005 by Doug Worrall Post: To figure how long a W/U takes,look in your Message tab.Right down Thank you, I have changed the applications to saved in memory,this will help tons.Thank you all very much.This is all so interesting. Sincerly Doug |
38)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
lag time
(Message 5627)
Posted 8 Dec 2005 by Doug Worrall Post: How did you determine the 4hr 10min figure???? Thanks Jim, Boinc Wiki is already on Firefox,Opera and Mozzila Suite. To figure how long a W/U takes,look in your Message tab.Right down the start time of that w/u.Once it has crunched its time.You simply compare start time and actual crunching Time.Surfing Emailing donnot affect the outcome of any W/U,Having 800Ram gives me lots of power. |
39)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
lag time
(Message 5625)
Posted 8 Dec 2005 by Doug Worrall Post: Is your machine crunching Rosetta 100%? or are you crunching other projects? Thanks Andrew, Actually for me to be able to cruch Rosetta I must suspend all 3 other Experiments to run Rosey succesfully.If a Benchmark happens during a Rosey W/U it fails. If I quit Boinc in any way I will lose W/U.This Box is Linux which makes it difficult to explain.I dont get it,LOL.Just succesfully Downloaded Boinc 5.2.13 with ease.It,s a beaut.As for the explanation regarding "checkpoints" Andrew,they make sense for other questions I donnot have to ask now.Thank you very much Andrew for the answer to the easiest question I have ever put on these Boards. Did not see any Scientists,you guys are great {hands-on},same for the {Boardwatchers?} ummm,brain block,you know whom you are,shoot,the Moderators. Dohh,can I swear?,but why?Are there any {subcultred} jerks ever try hacking or trying to mess up the Posts?Just curious. Thanks All Doug |
40)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
lag time
(Message 5561)
Posted 8 Dec 2005 by Doug Worrall Post: How did you determine the 4hr 10min figure???? In your tab that gives start times and in work tab says w/u time. I cannot understand why when I say a 4 hour W/U took 4 Hours and 15 Minutes.Therefore 15 missing minutes.If I crunch a 4 hour w/u, it takes 4 Hours not 4 hours and 15 Minutes. 12000 credits from Climate with no Lag time.10,200 Einstein No lag time same with Predictor LHC ect.... Rosetta takes usually about 8 xtra minutes on 4 hours. That is non sensicle,that is why I am asking if this is a Rosetta thing,or my Rosetta is mixed -up. Sincerely Doug |
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org