Posts by Doug Worrall

21) Message boards : Number crunching : "Concerned my P.C. isnot well" (Message 11958)
Posted 12 Mar 2006 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:

Hello Darren,James and Dimitris,

As it stands I only can crunch for 2 experiments now.Somehow I meesed-up the
O.V. and Boinc crashe several times.Now to start Boinc,I must go to home.
"Conquerer" and hold down CNTL click the run Client go to tools and execute
the shell.Then I have to repeat the same to get the Boinc Manager operational.
All my Malaria w/u failed,but, Einstein and Rosetta still work and am getting
better Credits than ever.I may have to do a Complete install of this O.S.
Unless you can Delete all Boinc files and reaaply them????
Have been asking these questions at my team page,but feel the non action
from them is basically R.T.F.M.{never have been helped there} assides
from the Originator of the Team and a couple of people that run Windows.
Mosr run multiple P.C,s and I guess have sort of a "clique",This may be the end
of there Non-action.Thank-you personnel and scientists and crunchers at rosetta.
Be Well
Sincerely
Doug Worrall
22) Message boards : Number crunching : "Concerned my P.C. isnot well" (Message 11908)
Posted 11 Mar 2006 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
In addition to previous posters' help, depending on your version of Linux, you could download an installable package, e.g. for Debian and the like http://wiki.debian.org/BOINC

In the Links section at the end of the URL in my sig, I have various links, including BOINC installable packages for others like Redhat-derived Linux (RPM) etc.

As for security, as you wrote, it's better to run BOINC in its very own account (under Linux or WinXP). The abovementioned packages will do it for you.

I've done it (creating separate user etc) by hand.

"Standard" BOINC for Linux from Berkeley ( http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download.php ) will under-report CPU speed under Linux by almost 50% vs the same hardware under WinXP (I don't know if newer versions have fixed this). It doesn't affect actual science, but it's unfair if you also care about credits. This BOINC-under-Linux is an issue for ALL BOINC projects.

In this case you can install one of the "optimised" clients, as previous poster suggested.


Thanks Dimitris,
Valubale info from all of you.I consider Rosetta my Premeire experiment due
to the great threads and moderators,crunchers and hands-on with the "Scientists,Too-Cool."
Sincerely
Doug Sluger Worrall
23) Message boards : Number crunching : "Concerned my P.C. isnot well" (Message 11879)
Posted 11 Mar 2006 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
Have looked at those "Optimised Clients",and,It is a bit above my knowledge.


Ah, don't let it scare you. Most of the optimized boinc clients are just a single file that you download to replace your existing file with. Now, to get an optimized seti app working is a little more involved, but still not hard.

If you decide to try one, just download the file and extract it into your boinc directory. In the case of Harold Naparst, you'll get a file named "boinc_naparst_p4", which is the replacement for your file named "boinc" that you have in your boinc directory now. Rather than try to make everything that may be linked find the new filename, it's much easier if you just stop boinc from running then change the name of the file now named "boinc" to something else (boinc_old, for instance). After that, change the name of the file "boinc_naparst_p4" to be just "boinc". You'll probably have to make it executable - which is the only kind of weird part of the whole thing. You can do this by right clicking on the file and choosing "properties", then click the "permissions" tab and put a mark in the box for "execute" on the "owner" line (or if you use the command prompt, from within the boinc directory just type "chmod+x boinc" without the quotes). After that, start boinc just like you normally do and you'll be using the optimized client - it should tell you right at startup that a new version is detected and it will then run new benchmarks automatically.

In the event there is any kind of a problem, you still have the old one, so you can just delete the new "boinc" and rename the other one back to boinc and you're right back where you were.

It sounds like a lot when you read it, but it's not really difficult at all. If you've gotten as far in linux as you obviously already have, I don't think this will give you much trouble.


Run Boinc is User instead of Root due to problems I could cause as a newbie.


That's not just a newbie thing. Everyone running boinc should be running it as a user, and not as root. The only thing you should normally do as root is make general system changes, like upgrading core software, setting up your network, and stuff such as that. Running everything else as a user instead of root not only keeps things from getting messed up, but it's one of the key things that makes linux systems so safe from hackers and virus/trojan software and such.

But again, don't be intimidated by it. Have your friend look over the web sites with the optimized clients and have him look over the instructions I gave you for installing one and he'll likely agree that you'll do ok with it.


Thanks Darren,
I beleive I can do this myself with the help you just offered me {Thak-You}
I downloaded Boinc 2.213 myself so cannot see too much a problem.I called the New
Boinc/Doinc and poof/it overwrote Doinc with Boinc.I will read your post a few
yimes,will go to those URL,s and study which client I prefer.I usually dowmload
to Desktop,Cut,Paste in Home.Make the shell executable and "Doinc",LOL.
I like your way though.Just rebooted and ran Bechmarks again.This time I did
nothing.Usually I look around Boinc Manager clicking this and that.Not this time.Also disabled kgreml but forgot Linux weather.
Thank you again Darren,I have mostly done all this Boinc stuff myself with
out much help.Just downloaded another Rosetta w/u.Recieved 6 points dor 2 hours
of Crunching.{That is all I do with my P.C.}Run Boinc and Email.That is why
I am dissapointed.
Sincerely
Doug*
24) Message boards : Number crunching : "Concerned my P.C. isnot well" (Message 11877)
Posted 11 Mar 2006 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
Doug, your benchmarks seem a bit low for your cpu from others I've seen, but I'm not all that up on what different cpu's should be giving so I could be wrong.

I see you're using boinc 5.2.13, and I assume you're using the standard download rather than an optimized version. If you're not aware, the standard versions don't benchmark properly on linux - which would be my guess as to why yours look on the low side. And your credit is directly determined by your benchmarks.

If you go back to the download page (from the homepage of any of the projects) and follow the link at the bottom for "download executables from a third-party site" (which will take you here), you'll find a few optimized versions of boinc that may work better for you. I personally use the version from Harold Naparst's site (here), as his does better for me than anything I could come up with for myself. If you go there, just be sure you get the one labeled "moral", as it is fully legitimate and doesn't try to implement any kind of cheats.

Short of trying an optimized boinc client, you can try rerunning your benchmarks (in the boinc manager, choose Commands | Run Benchmarks) and see if you can get better benchmarks. If you try that, make sure the system isn't doing anything else really cpu intensive at the same time (no busy programs running, stop any music, etc.).

Other than that, there's probably not really a lot you can easily do. I assume from your kernel name you're running Mandrake (or Mandriva). There's not going to be a lot you can easily change there - if anything at all - to get any big improvements.

Good luck.


Thanks Darren,
I am running LINUXOS 9.1 with KDE 3.5?Any ways I benchmarked when I reapplied a 4GB kernel for a test and it fubarred the Benchmarks.Have reapplyied the 1Gb
kernel and ran Bencmarks.Have looked at those "Optimised Clients",and,It is a bit above my knowledge.But my Bud that runs the same system set the swap spaces
for me and he knows nill about Boinc,but,with those URL,s you gave me I will send to him to read and maybe by setting Boinc-up with a Command line through
a Cosole instead of just the executable way will be besdt also.Run Boinc is User
instead of Root due to problems I could cause as a newbie.But this is good.I like trying what is best,and,feel imbaressed sometimes bugging my Teamates.
Thank you again Darren and "Happy Crunching"
Sincerely
Doug Worrall
25) Message boards : Number crunching : "Concerned my P.C. isnot well" (Message 11874)
Posted 11 Mar 2006 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:

Hello,
If this can be of any help.
Sincerly
Doug*

Computer information
IP address Show IP address
Domain name localhost
Local Standard Time UTC -6 hours
Name localhost
Created 3 Mar 2006 14:58:40 UTC
Total Credit 3,367.98
Recent average credit 22.39
CPU type GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.40GHz
Number of CPUs 1
Operating System Linux
2.6.13-oci2.mdk-i586-up-1GB
Memory 749.2 MB
Cache 256 KB
Swap space 1239.35 MB
Total disk space 30 GB
Free Disk Space 29.5 GB
Measured floating point speed 378.68 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 1001.41 million ops/sec
Average upload rate Unknown
Average download rate Unknown
Average turnaround time 0.32 days
Maximum daily WU quota per CPU 100/day
Results 16
Number of times client has contacted server 39
Last time contacted server 11 Mar 2006 1:44:32 UTC
% of time BOINC client is running 98.1219 %
While BOINC running, % of time host has an Internet connection -100 %
While BOINC running, % of time work is allowed 99.9857 %
Average CPU efficiency 0.948428
Result duration correction factor 0.460462
Location
Click to merge this computer
26) Message boards : Number crunching : "Concerned my P.C. isnot well" (Message 11873)
Posted 11 Mar 2006 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
27) Message boards : Number crunching : "dissapointed"{new kernel} (Message 11728)
Posted 6 Mar 2006 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
Hello,
Have installed a new kernel in my system{linux} a 4gb one from a 1gb one.Was ,receiving relatively good
scores,Below is the new resuts,should I go back to the 1kb kernel?

Rosetta@home


Results for user
UW Seal


[ Home ] [ Join ] [ About ] [ Participants ] [ Community ] [ Statistics ]
[ login/out ]

explain CPU time (sec) claimed credit granted credit
12680249 9428299 6 Mar 2006 13:09:24 UTC 13 Mar 2006 13:09:24 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- ---
12614195 10122958 5 Mar 2006 23:44:04 UTC 6 Mar 2006 13:00:09 UTC Over Success Done 7,150.81 5.44 5.44
12604701 10114529 5 Mar 2006 22:19:09 UTC 5 Mar 2006 23:44:04 UTC Over Client error Computing 270.47 0.21 ---
12565996 10079656 5 Mar 2006 13:07:35 UTC 5 Mar 2006 22:11:34 UTC Over Success Done 6,319.62 4.81 4.81
12499825 10020792 4 Mar 2006 8:03:50 UTC 4 Mar 2006 12:42:23 UTC Over Client error Computing 1,111.53 1.44 ---
12499327 10020322 5 Mar 2006 3:21:54 UTC 5 Mar 2006 11:09:59 UTC Over Success Done 7,214.36 5.49 5.49
12458289 9980066 4 Mar 2006 19:39:14 UTC 5 Mar 2006 0:42:06 UTC Over Success Done 6,666.69 5.29 5.29
12433098 9955380 4 Mar 2006 12:42:23 UTC 4 Mar 2006 19:39:14 UTC Over Success Done 7,087.65 9.16 9.16
12410992 9933802 4 Mar 2006 3:15:42 UTC 4 Mar 2006 10:27:57 UTC Over Success Done 6,267.16 8.10 8.10
12388360 9911612 3 Mar 2006 22:45:32 UTC 4 Mar 2006 3:15:42 UTC Over Success Done 6,809.92 8.80 8.80
12354540 9887015 3 Mar 2006 15:56:10 UTC 3 Mar 2006 21:44:07 UTC Over Success Done 6,826.04 8.82 8.82
12349714 9882304 3 Mar 2006 14:58:40 UTC 3 Mar 2006 15:56:10 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
Sincerely
Doug Sluger Worrall
28) Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : I'm a novice^^ (Message 11696)
Posted 6 Mar 2006 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:

Hello There,

If you have the time,go thru the threads and read all the news on the main Page.
This is where you will learn much.Just donnot quit Boinc in the middle of
a w/u,even if you have "saved in memeory" tab checked in your "Prefereneces."
It {may} wreck that w/u.
All the Posts from Moderators,Scietists and crunchers have a wealth of info
regarding this Experiment.
"Happy Crunching"
Doug Sluger Worrall
29) Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : I'm a novice^^ (Message 11628)
Posted 4 Mar 2006 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:

Welcome Andy74,

The Boinc world.You are off to a great start by crunching for Rosetta.
The staff,scientists,Forum moderators are "Hands-on" and Informative,{compared-
to other experiments}.
Now the w/u are 2 hours and I am very happy.Thank-you Rosetta
and Enjoy being a Boincateer Andy.

Sincerely

Doug Worrall
30) Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Humor in the work? (Message 8382)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
"No_Sim_aneal {poisoning?}
HeJE
31) Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Humor in the work? (Message 8271)
Posted 3 Jan 2006 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
just increased Rosey too 200% share and now I get "increase_Cycles",and something
"Scietific",It is!My Bet.
Doug
32) Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Humor in the work? (Message 8187)
Posted 2 Jan 2006 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
Thank-You All,
I get it,dohh,Now will crunch even more,good for a laugh!

Doug Worrall
33) Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Humor in the work? (Message 7751)
Posted 27 Dec 2005 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
This last one is just great.LOL
The W/U name is:MORE_FRAGS_WITH_BARCODE:Great stuff,may keep crunching untill
they stop being funny.I thought a Hacker got to Boinc and was changing the names
and that is why I cam here to "Investigate".LOL
Good one guys,you need some time-off anyways.
When you get back from Holidays "Hope" you can tell Me a dummy the Meaning of them
Sincerely
Doug Worrall
34) Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Humor in the work? (Message 7748)
Posted 27 Dec 2005 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
I am crunching one right now,that is why I am here.
The last 3 w/u had weird/great names.Should have written them down.I was Flabergasted.They were all very funny and I am sure the Moderators will
tell us some more names.I can go look back at the old w/u.
See Ya
Doug Here are the "Other" funny w/u,now I get-it,dohh.
"NO BARRCODE FRAGS" and
"NO MORE RELAX CYCLES" good ones guys.
Doug Worrall

Nearly done a real cool named one.Cannot see full name till complete.LOL
35) Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Humor in the work? (Message 7733)
Posted 27 Dec 2005 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
I am crunching one right now,that is why I am here.
The last 3 w/u had weird/great names.Should have written them down.I was Flabergasted.They were all very funny and I am sure the Moderators will
tell us some more names.I can go look back at the old w/u.
See Ya
Doug Here are the "Other" funny w/u,now I get-it,dohh.
"NO BARRCODE FRAGS" and
"NO MORE RELAX CYCLES" good ones guys.
Doug Worrall
36) Message boards : Number crunching : client for AMD64 X2 ?? (Message 6070)
Posted 13 Dec 2005 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
Hello,
Am running Linux from the Live Distro for 6 Months.Fedora am not sure of.
Hope you are not in Root ,that could be a problem,but,also,I have been unable
to get work either.Rosey was down for a bit today so that could be part and parcel
of the problem with the "rejection"

Good Luck
Boinc Wiki does have great info for Linux users,all the way from installing
all these new Boincs,LOL am at 5.??? I forget.
Sincerly
Doug Worrall
Boinc Synergy
37) Message boards : Number crunching : lag time (Message 5664)
Posted 9 Dec 2005 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
To figure how long a W/U takes,look in your Message tab.Right down
the start time of that w/u.Once it has crunched its time.You simply
compare start time and actual crunching Time.Surfing Emailing donnot affect
the outcome of any W/U,Having 800Ram gives me lots of power.


You are comparing "CPU Time" to "clock time". CPU time will _always_ be less. Your computer must do many things, even if you are not surfing, emailing, or playing a game; it must update the clock on the computer (every second), it must refresh the video screen (many times per second, and even if this is done by separate hardware, that hardware must be refreshed from the CPU every so often), it must check to see if you have moved a mouse or hit a key, or if a network packet has come in...

In every "clock second", the computer probably does 100 things _other_ than just work on Rosetta. The fewer things it is doing, the closer the two numbers will come, but a "lag time" of a few minutes per hour is perfectly normal.

Also - to fix your problem with errors in Rosetta, change the preference "leave applications in memory when suspended" to YES. Then it will switch with other projects without a problem. It _will_ still give an error if you quit BOINC, at least sometimes.


Thank you,
I have changed the applications to saved in memory,this will help tons.Thank
you all very much.This is all so interesting.
Sincerly
Doug
38) Message boards : Number crunching : lag time (Message 5627)
Posted 8 Dec 2005 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
How did you determine the 4hr 10min figure????



Thanks Jim,
Boinc Wiki is already on Firefox,Opera and Mozzila Suite.
To figure how long a W/U takes,look in your Message tab.Right down
the start time of that w/u.Once it has crunched its time.You simply
compare start time and actual crunching Time.Surfing Emailing donnot affect
the outcome of any W/U,Having 800Ram gives me lots of power.
39) Message boards : Number crunching : lag time (Message 5625)
Posted 8 Dec 2005 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
Is your machine crunching Rosetta 100%? or are you crunching other projects?

If you're doing multiple projects you could be losing some time when the projects are switched.

I believe that Rosetta checkpoints 10 ten times. If your crunching Rosetta and your between checkpoints, say you're at 88% completion (ie. between the 80% and 90% checkpoints), and then you switch projects, you will loose the crunch time you did after 80% because when you switch back to Rosetta you'll start 80% not 88%.



Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Thanks Andrew,
Actually for me to be able to cruch Rosetta I must suspend all 3 other Experiments
to run Rosey succesfully.If a Benchmark happens during a Rosey W/U it fails.
If I quit Boinc in any way I will lose W/U.This Box is Linux which makes it difficult to explain.I dont get it,LOL.Just succesfully Downloaded Boinc
5.2.13 with ease.It,s a beaut.As for the explanation regarding "checkpoints"
Andrew,they make sense for other questions I donnot have to ask now.Thank
you very much Andrew for the answer to the easiest question I have ever
put on these Boards.
Did not see any Scientists,you guys are great {hands-on},same for the
{Boardwatchers?} ummm,brain block,you know whom you are,shoot,the Moderators.
Dohh,can I swear?,but why?Are there any {subcultred} jerks ever try
hacking or trying to mess up the Posts?Just curious.

Thanks All
Doug
40) Message boards : Number crunching : lag time (Message 5561)
Posted 8 Dec 2005 by Profile Doug Worrall
Post:
How did you determine the 4hr 10min figure????



In your tab that gives start times and in work tab says w/u time.
I cannot understand why when I say a 4 hour W/U took 4 Hours and
15 Minutes.Therefore 15 missing minutes.If I crunch a 4 hour w/u,
it takes 4 Hours not 4 hours and 15 Minutes.
12000 credits from Climate with no Lag time.10,200 Einstein
No lag time same with Predictor LHC ect....
Rosetta takes usually about 8 xtra minutes on 4 hours.
That is non sensicle,that is why I am asking if this is a Rosetta
thing,or my Rosetta is mixed -up.
Sincerely
Doug


Previous 20 · Next 20



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org