1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Multiple Computation Errors
(Message 75363)
Posted 13 Apr 2013 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: Same computation errors here. My computer almost freezes because of these WU's. Something serious wrong there. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU getting too hot
(Message 63567)
Posted 2 Oct 2009 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: Opened my PC and discovered a dustbomb. Filthy boy :( |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU getting too hot
(Message 63543)
Posted 1 Oct 2009 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: Thanks for ur reaction Mikey. U described exactly my problem. Temperature is going to 72. But that's normal u say. Ok, I'll keep on crunching then ;) |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU getting too hot
(Message 63537)
Posted 1 Oct 2009 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: My CPU gets too hot when running boinc and that scares the shit out of me. Every 5 minutes my cooler goes in overdrive. Is there a way to control this temperature by software ? Or adjust some preferences in Boinc ? I have Intel. |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Minirosetta 1.97
(Message 63531)
Posted 30 Sep 2009 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=284162008 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=259177853 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=259177853 2 WU's with same problem. Both frb_ . Should I allow more disk space for those WU's ? |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta 5.95
(Message 52012)
Posted 19 Mar 2008 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: I have a workunit taking already 4 hours now, it is on 95% and it takes 30 seconds to go one step further. Is this normal ? |
7)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Good news for BOINC ?
(Message 52011)
Posted 19 Mar 2008 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: Click here |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc is crunching only one WU
(Message 43945)
Posted 19 Jul 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: I've changed my preferences, the problem stays |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc is crunching only one WU
(Message 43896)
Posted 19 Jul 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: I have a dual processor and my computer was used to crunch 2 WU's at the same time. After attaching Superlink@technion only 1 WU was running. I've thrown out this project. But the problem stays. Boinc only crunches 1 WU at the same time. What can I do to make Boinc crunch like before ? |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Vista errors
(Message 39307)
Posted 12 Apr 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: Sorry, I made them visible. So U can see now my results ? |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Vista errors
(Message 39300)
Posted 12 Apr 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: Can you describe the client error? Do you have your General Preference set to leave applications in memory while preempted? Sorry for the late response. Here is my results page.... Click Maybe U can do something with this information ? |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Vista errors
(Message 39162)
Posted 8 Apr 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: I always have a client error when I close my computer and start it the next time up. This happens since I've installed Windows Vista. What can I do ? I am also running WCG and it seems I don't have there this error, so it must be Rosetta related. |
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with rosetta 5.48
(Message 37395)
Posted 4 Mar 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: And again :| This one already stopped after 6 seconds. |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with rosetta 5.48
(Message 37394)
Posted 4 Mar 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: My WU is at 1% and wont go any higher. The CPU time is counting, but the percentage is constantly 1% and the time remaining is counting up. The same for me. Here is the link to my Failed WU Paused the WU, resumed it. Closed Boinc and restarted Boinc. Nothing worked. It was just totally frozen after 1 minute and a couple of seconds. |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.46
(Message 36986)
Posted 20 Feb 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: I also have a Core2duo. And just to say I have now a WU with -1300 energy and no problems. So forget about that ;) |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.46
(Message 36943)
Posted 18 Feb 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: Failed WU I also had a WU, a DOC that after 1 hour of processing didn't pass step 507. It was a huge result, an energy of -1100. Maybe that's important to know. So I aborted it |
17)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Anything New?
(Message 36774)
Posted 14 Feb 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: So rosetta is searching for optimization of protein prediction and HPF searched for medical applications based on the rosetta structure ? |
18)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
A possible cure for Cancer
(Message 36765)
Posted 14 Feb 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: On the official homepage (University of Alberta) I've found an article that says 80% of the rats were cured. If u know the survival rates of cancer, I think this is already a big step forward. The positive to remember is that the clinical trails can skip processes that are already made in the past and that the drug can be much faster on the market. |
19)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
A possible cure for Cancer
(Message 36586)
Posted 12 Feb 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: Were 100 % of those rats cured ? I give it a chanche. I also know scientists discover each day new promising target proteins. But why can't cancer be just a mytochondrial disease like they say ? And Dr Michelakis also gives a reasonable answer why metastasis happens and how DCA can cure it. Well....the full detailed article is placed in The Cancer Cell magazine but not reachable for me :( Cancer Cell Magazine |
20)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
A possible cure for Cancer
(Message 36484)
Posted 11 Feb 2007 by 288VKYUjwsXfAaTXn6SFJC4LVPRf Post: Why it is a bad article then ? (I can't see the feedback section) |
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org