1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Message from AI?
(Message 77868)
Posted 28 Jan 2015 by macko Post: A part of stderr out # cpu_run_time_pref: 43200 Continuing computation from checkpoint: chk_S_00035_FragmentSampler__stage1 ... success! Continuing computation from checkpoint: chk_S_00035_FragmentSampler__stage2 ... success! Continuing computation from checkpoint: chk_S_00035_FragmentSampler__stage_3_iter1_1 ... success! Continuing computation from checkpoint: chk_S_00035_FragmentSampler__stage_3_iter1_2 ... success! Continuing computation from checkpoint: chk_S_00035_FragmentSampler__stage_3_iter1_3 ... success! hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? hey is this the right thing to be doing??? [2015- 1-27 14:17:23:] :: BOINC:: Initializing ... ok. [2015- 1-27 14:17:23:] :: BOINC :: boinc_init() BOINC:: Setting up shared resources ... ok. BOINC:: Setting up semaphores ... ok. BOINC:: Updating status ... ok. BOINC:: Registering timer callback... ok. BOINC:: Worker initialized successfully. command: projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/minirosetta_3.52_windows_x86_64.exe @6h2r13131012415_fold_and_dock_flags -silent_gz -mute all -out:file:silent default.out -in:file:boinc_wu_zip fold_and_dock_6h2r13131012415_data.zip -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 21600 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 1971070 Registering options.. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Any pointers for this failure?
(Message 72868)
Posted 23 Apr 2012 by macko Post: Thanks again Ok, thanks again and again... The situation is as you can see above, that I use Boinc ver. 5.XX instead of 6.XX. Why? On this garbage with Win98se, available 6.xx version unable to connect the client-localhost. Reason: the client not starting. Solution from boinc mngr (error message): go to control panel, admin tools and start the service. HAHAHA. There is no such thing in win98 control panel and there are no services in win 98, only processes as I know. As you see, the solution for a problem is suitable for higher OS...By the way during install there were sometimes error messages (start with repair.... and so on). Install-reinstall-uninstall-repair boinc, "refresh" setup of OS has not solved the issue. There is no possibility to change or upgrade the system (corporate stuff) Finally thanks to all. My opinion that this mess can't be solved. your sincerely |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Any pointers for this failure?
(Message 72866)
Posted 23 Apr 2012 by macko Post: Thanks again I suppose then I need to create a config.xml file (or cc_config), (search returned nothing)? This is not user friendly... :). By the way, "exclude GPU or no GPU" options are available from ver. 6.xx configs. Would setting up a config.xml with the option set not to use a GPU work? |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Any pointers for this failure?
(Message 72865)
Posted 23 Apr 2012 by macko Post: I think we have similar error report despite different OS. Hi Thanks for your efforts. But... In this version (<core_client_version>5.8.16</core_client_version>) I think there is no GPU option. Also in 3.24 there was the "device", in 3.26 it has "gone" immediately... |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Any pointers for this failure?
(Message 72817)
Posted 18 Apr 2012 by macko Post: I think we have similar error report despite different OS. Mine: Exit status: -185 (0xffffffffffffff47). stderr out <core_client_version>5.8.16</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> CreateProcess() failed - Device attached to the system is not functioning. (0x1f) </message> ]]> The machine was happily working on BOINC 6.something. An upgrade to 7.0.25, another project reset, and no joy. Just watched as it took another try on the one work unit per day the project is allowing after so many failures. Same behavior, download of everything happens, then five process creation failures, and the task is finished with status of computation error. Same exit status (-185). No firewall requests or antivirus action. Nothing in the Windows event logs. |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Any pointers for this failure?
(Message 72800)
Posted 17 Apr 2012 by macko Post: Hi I have a quite similar problem on one of my old PC. It runs Win98 SE and from last update (3,26) all Wu-s finished immediately. Previously I tried to run some other low demand projects on this device. Many has similar problems: unable to load device bla-bla. Some are able to run correctly (POEM, SIMAP, SZTAKI). I think, despite most of the projects says they are compatible with old OS-s, practically they don't. It is just a matter of time that program developers ignore old OSs in new releases. With regards PS: I checked lots of forums about this and no solution found except upgrade the OS. Machine is Win2K, so no per-executable permissions. I checked and didn't see anything recent in antivirus quarantine, nor did it flag anything after the project reset (which seemed to have dumped all the files, since I saw it downloading executables again). I'll check the firewall log, but all the software firewall on that old box does is rules controlling network access. So unless the new executable needs its own internet access rules (versus Boinc's standing rules), I'm not inclined to think the firewall is the issue. |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with web site
(Message 71090)
Posted 18 Aug 2011 by macko Post: Wow And down. It was only transient sparkling. |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with web site
(Message 71087)
Posted 18 Aug 2011 by macko Post: Wow Results comes up again. |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Newbie Q&A, if you're new, have a view!
(Message 70567)
Posted 17 Jun 2011 by macko Post: Hello Forum, Hi I think no. I use this app. somethimes also, but there wasn't any major effect on my running projects. With regards |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with web site
(Message 70155)
Posted 28 Apr 2011 by macko Post: The results server should now be working, as indicated in this post. Thanks!!! |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65070)
Posted 22 Jan 2010 by macko Post: Here's a couple of relaxopt_grow WUS that exited after a few seconds with the error: Same error, same wus relaxopt_grow.1ctf.1ctf. |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65049)
Posted 20 Jan 2010 by macko Post: Could you elaborate what it is that you're seeing? These types of job are treated as others in these respects. Hi There were some WUs not showed on results page, here is small (uncomplete)collection from last months: aTt13 histone 1 famA foldit WUs denovo_design_rossmann2x3_flxbb (a really RAM eating ang long running ones) NeR103A CGR26A and finally this two from 2010: CtR69A_2KRU_BOINC_ABRELAX, 3gbn bla-bla&gz_dock And now the 8gbnnotyr WUs seems to have similar fate, crunching only for credit. |
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65047)
Posted 20 Jan 2010 by macko Post: Hi This WU's, "8gbnnotyr" and older "dock" types won't be listed on results pages? With regards |
14)
Questions and Answers :
Web site :
Result plots not working?
(Message 64427)
Posted 10 Dec 2009 by macko Post:
Some new ones: NeR103A CGR26A |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
sel_core_2.0 units crashing quickly.
(Message 64079)
Posted 18 Nov 2009 by macko Post: got the same error as adrian on 2 tasks Hi The same on 3 tasks |
16)
Questions and Answers :
Web site :
Result plots not working?
(Message 63935)
Posted 3 Nov 2009 by macko Post:
I extend my question: All of the foldit WUs denovo_design_rossmann2x3_flxbb (a really RAM eating ang long running ones) |
17)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Structure predictions in copper-bearing proteins
(Message 63805)
Posted 24 Oct 2009 by macko Post: Hi It is very exciting to have infos about copper binding proteins, some of them are really important in oxido-reductase processes, especially the SOD. But are we crunching any of them? The PDB codes are not familiar to me. By the way I am curius about what is Rosetta's plan about this: 1cc8 a mercury binding metallochaperone atx1? Actualy similar structures (atx1) could be involved in copper transport also. With regards |
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Minirosetta 1.98
(Message 63804)
Posted 24 Oct 2009 by macko Post: Second chance for this one also proved a failure: Hi Similar error with this: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=263361396 Exception: failure to read decoy F_00023_0001585_0 from silent-file lr8_1lou.out CPU time 15.23438 And a different one with these: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=263361627 Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00436BD8 read attempt to address 0x018BD000 Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger... http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=263361627 Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00436BD8 read attempt to address 0x018BD000 Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger... After these 3 the program runs normal |
19)
Questions and Answers :
Web site :
Result plots not working?
(Message 63767)
Posted 20 Oct 2009 by macko Post: Hi There are some WUs not listed in results: starting with aTt13, histone, 1 famA. Why? Which proteins are aTt13 and 1famA? What does vanilla means in many of WUs? Thanks |
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report long-running models here
(Message 63670)
Posted 13 Oct 2009 by macko Post: Hi This WU "Rossmann2X3_036_15149_10247" probably have stopped at 30,250% while the CPU time proceded. After pause-resume it finished elapsing app. 9 hours. In report 7870 sec is the CPU time. http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=287006963 |
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org