Posts by TCU Computer Science

21) Message boards : Number crunching : Report stuck & aborted 5.01 WU here please - III (Message 14545) Posted 24 Apr 2006 by TCU Computer Science Post: Three more 5.01 WUs were aborted this morning: 63.0 hrs http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17864947 NO_TERM_STRAND_1ogw_388_841 62.8 hrs http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17849525 FACONTACTS_RECENTER_NOFILTERS_1eyvA_448_842 30.2 hrs http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17942565 FACONTACTS_RECENTER_NOFILTERS_5croA_448_703
22) Message boards : Number crunching : Report stuck & aborted 5.01 WU here please - III (Message 14515) Posted 24 Apr 2006 by TCU Computer Science Post: These 5.01 WUs were aborted today: 11.8 hrs http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17929192 FACONTACTS_RECENTER_NOFILTERS_1ubi__448_846 34.7 hrs http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17754714 HBLR_1.0_1hz6_420_5519 44.2 hrs http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17786665 HBLR_1.0_1di2_ROT_TRIALS_TRIE_449_49 50.7 hrs http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17762275 HBLR_1.0_1hz6_420_7237 49.3 hrs http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17773010 FACONTACTS_RECENTER_NOFILTERS_1vls__448_927 27.5 hrs http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17797075 NO_TERM_STRAND_1ogw_423_3285
23) Message boards : Number crunching : Report stuck & aborted WU here please - II (Message 14012) Posted 18 Apr 2006 by TCU Computer Science Post: Let me know what the result number is -- if its not flagged to get credit, I can see why. Here is one that ran for 88 hours. I aborted it on 28 March http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=14764800
24) Message boards : Number crunching : Report stuck & aborted WU here please - II (Message 13881) Posted 16 Apr 2006 by TCU Computer Science Post: I aborted nine WUs today. These four showed 20-50 hours of accumulated time 17028012 TRUNCATE_TERMINI_FULLRELAX_1b3aA_433_678 17051917 TRUNCATE_TERMINI_FULLRELAX_1ptq__433_905 17050886 TRUNCATE_TERMINI_FULLRELAX_1enh__433_896 16238549 FA_RLXpt_hom006_1ptq__361_440 The following five showed little or no accumulated time but had been running for 4-11 days: 17016383 TRUNCATE_TERMINI_FULLRELAX_1ptq__433_569 16970141 TRUNCATE_TERMINI_FULLRELAX_2tif__433_104 16995174 TRUNCATE_TERMINI_FULLRELAX_2tif__433_369 16196147 FA_RLXpt_hom002_1ptq__361_379 16227211 FARELAX_NOFILTERS_1bm8__417_637
25) Message boards : Number crunching : Report stuck & aborted WU here please (Message 12772) Posted 28 Mar 2006 by TCU Computer Science Post: The following were aborted today. All were stuck at 1.00% after running for 20+ hours ID=12326404 name = HB_BARCODE_30_1c8cA_351_32403 ID=12261321 name = HB_BARCODE_30_256bA_351_28680 ID=12034212 name = HB_BARCODE_30_1bk2__351_16205 ID=11076727 name = FA_RLXb3_hom001_1b3aA_359_347 ID=11972587 name = FA_RLXb3_hom010_2chf__362_384 ID=11761822 name = FA_RLXur_hom004_1urnA_362_308
26) Message boards : Number crunching : Report stuck & aborted WU here please (Message 10367) Posted 2 Feb 2006 by TCU Computer Science Post: Two WUs stuck at 1% and aborted on 02 Feb: NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_2reb_286_4502_0 TERMINI_2reb_294_6931_0 The first one ran for 94 hours before I noticed it.
27) Message boards : Number crunching : Report stuck & aborted WU here please (Message 10163) Posted 29 Jan 2006 by TCU Computer Science Post: I just noticed that on one of my computers NEW_SOFT_CENTROID_PACKING_1di2_225_7586_0 has been running since 6 January. boincmgr shows CPU Time 01:10:08 Progress 20% To completion 05:01:08 but the messages show about 120 one-hour slices spent in execution. The "pausing" messages show that it is being left in memory. This is a known R@H bug. To prevent the problem you must do the following- In your user preferences you should set the time between application switching (or swaps) to something cole to 2 hours (120 Min). That is usually enough to keep things going, But if you want to be really certain you should set the system so that it keeps the R@H application in memory during application swaps. The is more about this in the FAQ sticky here. Yes, I know about that. I have the preferences set to keep the app in memory and the "pausing" messages say that it is being kept in memory. So far, this is the only stuck WU that I have encountered.
28) Message boards : Number crunching : Report stuck & aborted WU here please (Message 9736) Posted 24 Jan 2006 by TCU Computer Science Post: I just noticed that on one of my computers NEW_SOFT_CENTROID_PACKING_1di2_225_7586_0 has been running since 6 January. boincmgr shows CPU Time 01:10:08 Progress 20% To completion 05:01:08 but the messages show about 120 one-hour slices spent in execution. The "pausing" messages show that it is being left in memory.

Previous 20