Posts by MarcoA

1) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.98 (Message 65410)
Posted 24 Feb 2010 by MarcoA
Post:
1
2
3

Error, Error and Error.
Fortunately, these WUs took only zero seconds of my precious CPU-time :)
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta 1.98 (Message 63936)
Posted 3 Nov 2009 by MarcoA
Post:
http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=292416155

Segfault...
3) Message boards : Number crunching : Got low credit for big task (Message 63765)
Posted 20 Oct 2009 by MarcoA
Post:
similar thing here: Time preference 8h, runtime ~13h. Claimed: 227, granted: 17.

Seems there are some problems in the newest version of minirosetta?

EDIT: forgot the link, ups ^^ http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=289289072
4) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.98 (Message 63714)
Posted 16 Oct 2009 by MarcoA
Post:
Here is another rossmann-task with the same [-1,+1]-Error:

http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=288301200
5) Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta 1.98 (Message 63713)
Posted 16 Oct 2009 by MarcoA
Post:
same as with AMD_is_logical:
http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=288316563:

ERROR: Illegal attempt to score with non-identical atom set between pose and etable
ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/scoring/etable/EtableEnergy.cc line: 72

at least it took only 6s of CPU-Time.
6) Message boards : Number crunching : Many validate errors with cgq_*_redesign* WUs (Message 63337)
Posted 14 Sep 2009 by MarcoA
Post:
As you can see here, many WUs with the namescheme above have validation errors on all 3 of my computers:

http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=279329672
http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=279400245
http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=279430089

Just as one example per machine. There seems to be a problem in these WUs or in the validator or between both ;)
7) Message boards : Number crunching : Granted Credit taking forever.... (Message 63236)
Posted 10 Sep 2009 by MarcoA
Post:
same here... since yesterday, all of my WUs stay pending.

But the Server Status (http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/rah_status.php) lists every program as running and operating normally...

I took a look at some of the pending WUs and most of them have a name like
1XXX (3 different big Letters)
or
lr5_combine(_smooth_torsion|_mod)

Furthermore, almost (ca 90%) every pending WU ran much shorter than wanted (12 hours).

Perhaps there is someting wrong with a new batch of WUs?
8) Message boards : Number crunching : 64-bit support? (Message 57391)
Posted 1 Dec 2008 by MarcoA
Post:
What about the Linux-64-Bit-apps? Are they also wrapped-only? I found they performe a little bit better than 32Bit on 32Bit-Linux...
9) Message boards : Number crunching : can not upload files (Message 57390)
Posted 1 Dec 2008 by MarcoA
Post:
Same here,
POEM and LHC upload properly, so it seems to be a Rosetta-specific problem.
Guess, all communications during the downtime are a bit too much for the
server coming at once ^^






©2022 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org