Posts by jay

1) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home (Message 105504) Posted 17 Mar 2022 by jay Post: About the 'Residue' error... I think its a good idea to re-post the complete error from a task... <stderr_txt> command: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu @preetham_gen_59129_0001_0001_0.flags -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -boinc:max_nstruct 20000 -checkpoint_interval 120 -mute all -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -boinc::cpu_run_timeout 36000 -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 3988120 Using database: database_357d5d93529_n_methyl/minirosetta_database ERROR: Error in simple_cycpcp_predict app read_sequence() function! The minimum number of residues for a cyclic peptide is 4. (GenKIC requires three residues, plus a fourth to serve as an anchor). ERROR:: Exit from: src/protocols/cyclic_peptide_predict/SimpleCycpepPredictApplication.cc line: 2264 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out 20:44:11 (20850): called boinc_finish(1) </stderr_txt> I run Linux and my wing-man (on this and other WU) runs windows. Both get the same error. I assume this is the same error that is on this forum for the last few days. I have set ' no new work' for Rosetta and will check back on this forum to see if the code has been fixed... reference: https://www.rosettacommons.org/docs/latest/scripting_documentation/RosettaScripts/composite_protocols/generalized_kic/GeneralizedKIC Happy St. Patrick's Day! Jay
2) Message boards : Number crunching : March 2022 - WU error rates (Message 105411) Posted 11 Mar 2022 by jay Post: Greetings, I am working the non-vbox WU and getting errors. I compare my errored results with my wing-man. for example, on one WU a Windows Volunteer errors out in 20 seconds. My Linux WU ran for 35939 seconds and had the error: "Too many errors (may have bug) Too many total results" on validation. See https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=1315068895 What gives? Is this a time of testing the WU? If so, can they be tested by Rosetta before releasing? For me it is a matter of electricity, heat, and non-productive work. Another WU, https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=1315163591 has already errored-out by my windows wing-man, while My linux box is still crunching. ( I has run for about 6 hours with 3.5 hours remaining. I am concerned about a similar failure.) I looked on the forums for recent errors - but did not see any. Anyone else have Problems - or having no errors? THANKS, Jay
3) Message boards : Number crunching : For the betterment of BOINC (Message 105334) Posted 6 Mar 2022 by jay Post: Greetings! My wishlist: - A requirement for all projects to clearly list their system requirements - Projects should clearly state what BOINC parameters their VBOX applications honor. eg: - does project control I/O of BOINC settings? - Does project continue to allocate memory on the fly? ( This is OK - JUST state it.) - How does VBOX allocate processor utilization. - Does project code spin on a resource lock instead of releasing control to other projects for a period. - Description of finite state machines used within code for balancing work and waiting. - More scientific description of what the code produces - what is next step? ( e.g. what is the difference in projects modelling covid-19 shapes. I miss World Community Grid - where Scripps Labs went to generate and test modeled simulations.) - Transparency - A pointer to the description of the BOINC API. and project code. - Debug examples I would like to volunteer to test code. I have done this before - I prefer white box testing where code can be examined for error-handling. Thanks, Jay
4) Questions and Answers : Preferences : Application Preference (Message 105276) Posted 28 Feb 2022 by jay Post: @Sid, Thanks for the info!!! Its a shame that web page has not been updated about Rosetta Mini. I tried VBOX . I have a fear that those WU are spinning on a lock and wasting electricity. In other VBOX projects, I noticed that VBOX uses internet I/O without honoring BOINC restrictions. Thanks again, Jay
5) Questions and Answers : Preferences : Application Preference (Message 105270) Posted 27 Feb 2022 by jay Post: Follow up: AT: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/apps.php, It says: "Rosetta@home currently has the following applications. When you participate in Rosetta@home, tasks for one or more of these applications will be assigned to your computer. The current version of the application will be downloaded to your computer. This happens automatically; you don't have to do anything." and there are three subheadings - Rosetta - Rosetta Mini - rosetta python projects Only rosetta python projects mentions VBOX. Question 1: does that mean that the other two do not require VBOX? When I try to get WU, the BOINC Event Log says:: Sun 27 Feb 2022 06:24:42 PM EST \| Rosetta@home \| Message from server: VirtualBox is not installed. and https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/server_status.php says that WU are available for both Rosetta and rosetta python projects. I am not "automatically" getting WU that do not require VBOX. Question 2: Is there another requirement or factor involved ( to get WU?) Thanks in advance, Jay [/list]
6) Questions and Answers : Preferences : Application Preference (Message 105266) Posted 27 Feb 2022 by jay Post: Greetings. I read that there are some Rosetta apps that do not require vbox. How do I select these? Thanks in advance, Jay
7) Questions and Answers : Unix/Linux : Installed R@h. Get "missing constraints file." (Message 102887) Posted 4 Oct 2021 by jay Post: Thanks, Grant. Jay
8) Questions and Answers : Unix/Linux : Installed R@h. Get "missing constraints file." (Message 102882) Posted 4 Oct 2021 by jay Post: Greetings. After several years, I have restarted using Rosetta@Home today (03 Oct. 2021). [edit] I am running Ubuntu Linux. [end edit] My first WU failed. My task list is at https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?userid=234922 Looking at the task data, it says: Name 5nvx_graft_buwei_xac_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_5wf5yk4z_1731809_7_0 Workunit 1278490109 It is a Validate error - Missing a constraint file Stderr output <core_client_version>7.16.16</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> command: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -run:protocol jd2_scripting -parser:protocol pdblite_boinc_120_10--fuse--predictor_v11_boinc_fix--fuse--tslp_design_v1_boinc_fix_plus6.xml @5nvx_graft_buwei_flags -in:file:silent 5nvx_graft_buwei_xac_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_5wf5yk4z.silent -in:file:silent_struct_type binary -silent_gz -mute all -silent_read_through_errors true -out:file:silent_struct_type binary -out:file:silent default.out -in:file:boinc_wu_zip 5nvx_graft_buwei_xac_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_5wf5yk4z.zip @5nvx_graft_buwei_xac_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_5wf5yk4z.flags -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -boinc:max_nstruct 20000 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -boinc::cpu_run_timeout 36000 -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 1141314 Using database: database_357d5d93529_n_methyl/minirosetta_database ERROR: [ERROR] Unable to open constraints file: m_15a03ae7649ebbac21f4683df9edff8e_0001_000000086_0001_35_50_H_._HHH_b1_03106_0001_1_0001.MSAcst ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/scoring/constraints/ConstraintIO.cc line: 457 17:11:07 (12659): called boinc_finish(0) </stderr_txt> ]]> I do not know what a constraints file should look like. I looked into ....database_357d5d93529_n_methyl/minirosetta_database and saw /database_357d5d93529_n_methyl/minirosetta_database/scoring/constraints/epr_distance_potential.histogram It looks like: x_axis -14.750 -14.250 -13.750 -13.250 -12.750 -12.250 -11.750 -11.250 -10.750 -10.250 -9.750 -9.250 -8.750 -8.250 -7.750 -7.250 -6.750 -6.250 -5.750 -5.250 -4.750 -4.250 -3.750 -3.250 -2.750 -2.250 -1.750 -1.250 -0.750 -0.250 0.250 0.750 1.250 1.750 2.250 2.750 3.250 3.750 4.250 4.7505.250 5.750 6.250 6.750 7.250 7.750 8.250 8.750 9.250 9.750 10.250 10.750 11.250 11.750 12.250 12.750 13.250 13.750 14.250 14.750 y_axis 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 -0.019 -0.058 -0.097 -0.138 -0.178 -0.220 -0.262 -0.304 -0.347 -0.390 -0.432 -0.476 -0.518 -0.561 -0.604 -0.647 -0.689 -0.731 -0.774 -0.815 -0.856 -0.897 -0.937 -0.977 -0.998 -0.999 -1.000 -0.999 -0.998 -0.995 -0.990 -0.985 -0.977 -0.968 -0.957 -0.943 -0.927 -0.907 -0.884 -0.857 -0.823 -0.784 -0.737 -0.677 -0.602 -0.505 -0.368 -0.157 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 I see no (apparently) mangled data. That was the only file in the directory. Any debug ideas?? Thanks in advance!! Jay
9) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home (Message 90191) Posted 11 Jan 2019 by jay Post: Thanks for your update!! I was wondering why a WU was taking more than 19 hours.. Jay
10) Message boards : Number crunching : Android. How to limit tasks downloaded? (Message 79572) Posted 21 Feb 2016 by jay Post: Greetings! I have two android devices - an older Kindle HD and a Samsung S-6 phone. Way too many WU are downloaded to both. I wanted to download just a few that can run at night. Some days, I leave my phone powered off. Same for the Kindle. I don't want it to overheat. And I don't like keeping partial or unstarted WU on me devices during the 'off' times. Its a pain to abort all of the extra WU. Yes, I set the available kernels to a count on one. But I still get 3 or 4 times the number of available kernels. Is there a way to control this? Not all projects are the same - with respect to getting work. Thanks in advance, Jay PS Will remove projects if WU keep failing. Is there a way to easily check for success on the BOINC App - rather than having to goto the project website and weed through the devices?? Thanks again, Jay
11) Message boards : Number crunching : SERVER PROBLEMS. (Message 62762) Posted 4 Aug 2009 by jay Post: Thank you Mod.Sense for the informative response!! I appreciate the time you take giving answers... I don't always stay connected and usually connect; enable network activity; get some coffee; do updates; disable network activity; and disconnect.... Thanks again, Jay
12) Message boards : Number crunching : SERVER PROBLEMS. (Message 62751) Posted 3 Aug 2009 by jay Post: Greetings! I am having intermittent problems uploading. Some times the WU go on the first time. Other times - it may take several retries. I like in Florda and use a DSL and assumed that the network was not at fault. I would like to test this with a ping. First of all, what is the address of theupload server? boinc.bakerlab.org or srv4.bakerlab.org I tried a short test on each: PING boinc.bakerlab.org (140.142.20.103): 100 data bytes 108 bytes from 140.142.20.103: icmp_seq=0 ttl=45 time=93 ms 108 bytes from 140.142.20.103: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=93 ms 108 bytes from 140.142.20.103: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=93 ms ----boinc.bakerlab.org PING Statistics---- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/med = 93/93/93/93 PING srv4.bakerlab.org (140.142.20.112): 100 data bytes 108 bytes from 140.142.20.112: icmp_seq=0 ttl=45 time=93 ms 108 bytes from 140.142.20.112: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=203 ms 108 bytes from 140.142.20.112: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=406 ms ----srv4.bakerlab.org PING Statistics---- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/med = 93/234/406/203 I turned on debug on BOINC file transfer. Here is what it said: 8/3/2009 4:32:59 PM rosetta@home Scheduler request completed 8/3/2009 4:35:50 PM Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 8/3/2009 4:35:50 PM rosetta@home [file_xfer_debug] FILE_XFER_SET::poll(): http op done; retval -184 8/3/2009 4:35:50 PM rosetta@home [file_xfer_debug] file transfer status -184 8/3/2009 4:35:50 PM rosetta@home Temporarily failed upload of lr8_newhb_run02_rlbn_1t2i_IGNORE_THE_REST_NATIVE_NOCON_14611_66_0_0: HTTP error 8/3/2009 4:35:50 PM rosetta@home Backing off 2 min 27 sec on upload of lr8_newhb_run02_rlbn_1t2i_IGNORE_THE_REST_NATIVE_NOCON_14611_66_0_0 8/3/2009 4:35:51 PM Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. 8/3/2009 4:38:18 PM rosetta@home Started upload of lr8_newhb_run02_rlbn_1t2i_IGNORE_THE_REST_NATIVE_NOCON_14611_66_0_0 8/3/2009 4:38:18 PM rosetta@home [file_xfer_debug] URL: http://srv4.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/file_upload_handler 8/3/2009 4:38:39 PM Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 8/3/2009 4:38:39 PM rosetta@home [file_xfer_debug] FILE_XFER_SET::poll(): http op done; retval -107 8/3/2009 4:38:39 PM rosetta@home [file_xfer_debug] file transfer status -107 8/3/2009 4:38:39 PM rosetta@home Temporarily failed upload of lr8_newhb_run02_rlbn_1t2i_IGNORE_THE_REST_NATIVE_NOCON_14611_66_0_0: connect() failed 8/3/2009 4:38:39 PM rosetta@home Backing off 6 min 22 sec on upload of lr8_newhb_run02_rlbn_1t2i_IGNORE_THE_REST_NATIVE_NOCON_14611_66_0_0 8/3/2009 4:38:41 PM Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. Suggestions?? As I take the 30 minutes to look at other posts and write this up, I find that the WU uploaded.. Still, I would like some insight on the process.... Many thanks!! Jay
13) Message boards : Number crunching : WU download error: couldn't get input files: (Message 58714) Posted 10 Jan 2009 by jay Post: Also getting download errors. variation? Loading Beta version. 1/10/2009 2:49:52 AM\|rosetta@home\|Started download of t076.pdb.gz 1/10/2009 2:49:53 AM\|rosetta@home\|Incomplete read of 43.000000 < 5KB for t076.pdb.gz - truncating 1/10/2009 2:49:53 AM\|rosetta@home\|Finished download of t076.pdb.gz 1/10/2009 2:49:53 AM\|rosetta@home\|Started download of t076.loop_file.gz 1/10/2009 2:49:53 AM\|rosetta@home\|[error] Checksum or signature error for t076.pdb.gz 1/10/2009 2:49:54 AM\|rosetta@home\|Finished download of t076.loop_file.gz Other possible environment items: I have a dsl connection. Using Kaspersky Internet Security Anti-Virus. This also happened earlier - 1/9/2009 11:13:22 PM\|rosetta@home\|[error] Checksum or signature error for t076.pdb.gz Thanks in advance, Jay
14) Message boards : Number crunching : Report long-running models here (Message 58368) Posted 2 Jan 2009 by jay Post: Hi, Another long running task... ------ snip snip snip ------ The task did complete at wall clock time 11:04AM Jay
15) Message boards : Number crunching : Report long-running models here (Message 58366) Posted 2 Jan 2009 by jay Post: Hi, Another long running task... Full WU name (you can copy the BOINC message from when the task completes). wuid=197237636 cc_nonideal_1_3_nocst4_hb_t303__IGNORE_THE_REST_2AH5A_6_5991_15 Type of operating system (version of Windows, Linux distribution, or Mac info.) Windows XP SP3 & updates BOINC version (see BOINC Manager "About" page). 6.4.5 wxWidgets version 2.8.7 Rosetta version (see BOINC Manager "tasks" page). Rosetta mini 1.47 A link to the task's results page. http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=197237636 If a specific model took longer then the rest of them, then what model # was shown in the graphic? model: 2 step: 1879201,...1880095,...,1881207,...,1882051, The graphic RMSD to Accepted energy plot is very scattered - no dense concentration . a blue strand and a green strand are waving at each other. They extend from a clump of the rest of the material. My notes. Task gets stuck at 97%. This is running on a laptop. I had to power off last night to drive home. But before I suspended all tasks, I noticed that this task had run over 3 hours and was stuck at 97%. I also noted over 3,000,000 page faults on the Rosetta task. I have 2 Gig of memory. Task Manager says 1.2 gig of physical mem are available. When I got home last, I restarted Boinc, Running Rosetta, WCG, and spinhenge. I noticed that the task lost its work and started over. This morning - after 9 hours real time the task was stuck again. I just (around 9:00AM EST) suspended all other tasks - and set 'no new tasks' so there will be no swapping out of the rosetta task and possible loss after checkpoint restart. After 1/2 hour of a single BOINC task running on an Intel duo, it still shows: Progress 97.520 % To complete: 15.04 minutes CPU time: 06:34:44 The 'to complete time' changes every 6 to 10 seconds and either increases or decreases a second. Ooops, it just stayed over minute on 15.01 seconds. I'll try to get a 10 minute cpu time interval... Progress 97.592 % To complete: 14.55 minutes CPU time: 06:45:21 I'll post this and see what is suggested. Thanks in advance!! Jay PS More data: Wall Clock: 10:00AM Progress 97.750% To complete: 00:14:37 minutes CPU time: 07:14:17
16) Message boards : Number crunching : how do you keep from losing work when windows wants to reboot your system after a update? (Message 58051) Posted 20 Dec 2008 by jay Post: Hello Feet1st, Re: Paging.. I kept on reading Microsoft FAQ, The Task Manager Help and others.. Found the best answer in a forum on another BOINC project: Clean Air Project. see http://www.WorldCommunityGrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread?thread=22602 This is an entire thread on the page faults. I had missed the distinction between hard and soft page faults. The hard fault (when going to disk) was not what I was having. (There was over one GB free - and - no excessive disk activity light.) What I can understand of the 'soft' fault is when an application does a malloc, or some system call for memory, and the OS goes and gets memory from the free space. Perhaps C++ does the same thing when creating and freeing instances... On the Rosetta task, the xp task manager (process tab) showed mem usage and VM size increase for a couple of minutes and then drop back. This behavior continued throughout the processing of the WU. The WCG thread talked about programs that managed memory in the user heap - rather than using the expensive OS calls - as more efficient. It doesn't look like adding memory or user tweaking can help this. Perhaps that would apply to the rosetta task as well. Thanks for your supporting data!!!! Jay
17) Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta v1.47 bug thread. (Message 58010) Posted 18 Dec 2008 by jay Post: Question on memory size.. Greetings! First of all, thanks to all of the developers for debugging the code. I have a question about the memory size and page fault rate for mini-rosetta 1.47 . I was looking at the windows (XP) task manager and looking at the memory size and page fault rate. I admit that I do not know what it all means - and would like to ask the forum for an explanation that would help me.. Environment: Here is what BOINC says: Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) Duo CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 14 Stepping 12] Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 mmx OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Professional x86 Editon, Service Pack 3, (05.01.2600.00) Memory: 2.00 GB physical, 4.87 GB virtual Disk: 107.41 GB total, 78.57 GB free Here is what the Task manger is showing for mini-rosetta 1.47 Mem usage: 184,944K ( Varying between 170,000K and 247,000K while I watched.) PF delta: 3,228 ( in a three second period) VM size: 199,344K ( and moving up to 243,000 K) I was running 2 Boinc projects at once: Rosetta and WCG-clean energy. If I suspend all others so that only Rosetta is running, the page faults are more sporadic, mostly zero, then up to 6,375 in the three second period. With Boinc only running the Rosetta task, the task manager says: Commit charge (K) total: 788748 limit: 5107808 peak: 1319708 Physical Memory (K) total: 2,095,532 available: 1,127,112 System cache: 838,252 Bottom Line - I assumed that the pf rate is not good. Do you know of anything I can tweak to help?? THANK YOU!! Jay E.
18) Message boards : Number crunching : Servers running, but no work available?? (Message 55115) Posted 17 Aug 2008 by jay Post: Greetings - Noticed the same thing happening.. (Time is Eastern Daylight Savings Time.) 8/16/2008 9:06:43 PM\|rosetta@home\|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 5061 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 8/16/2008 9:06:48 PM\|rosetta@home\|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks 8/16/2008 9:18:18 PM\|rosetta@home\|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 5066 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 8/16/2008 9:18:23 PM\|rosetta@home\|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks Server page (http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/rah_status.php) says 90 WU available. I rechecked the server page 9:38 PM, and it said 29 WU available.. This is one disadvantage of setting a short work buffer.... Have a great weekend.. Jay
19) Message boards : Number crunching : Servers running, but no work available?? (Message 55114) Posted 17 Aug 2008 by jay Post: Cheers mate, I don't know how I missed that option. :) I guess I just didn't think to closely examine network use for buffers, figured it was all about bandwidth and available times to access the network. Greetings... If you can stay connected and want a short turn around time, you can set the "Connect about very _____ days" and "Additional work buffer ____ days" values to a fraction like 0.1 This allows a single work unit to be sent at a time - thus getting the shortest turnaround time.. Have a great day crunching.... Jay
20) Message boards : Number crunching : May21-2008 Communication problems (Message 53242) Posted 21 May 2008 by jay Post: Greetings! Very happy cruncher here. Saw a new com error today with Rosetta - when downloading WU. BUT - also downloaded WU from Spinhenge without problem. Downloads seem to finish after a retry or two - just limping along Just wanted to share this with you.. Copy from BOINC Message page: 5/21/2008 1:22:03 PM\|rosetta@home\|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 14851 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 5/21/2008 1:22:08 PM\|rosetta@home\|Scheduler request succeeded: got 1 new tasks 5/21/2008 1:22:10 PM\|rosetta@home\|Started download of vf_1ten_.fasta.gz 5/21/2008 1:22:10 PM\|rosetta@home\|Started download of vf_1ten_.psipred_ss2.gz 5/21/2008 1:22:31 PM\|rosetta@home\|Finished download of vf_1ten_.fasta.gz 5/21/2008 1:22:31 PM\|rosetta@home\|Finished download of vf_1ten_.psipred_ss2.gz 5/21/2008 1:22:31 PM\|rosetta@home\|Started download of paths.vf2.9.3.txt.gz 5/21/2008 1:22:31 PM\|rosetta@home\|Started download of boinc_vf_aa1ten_03_05.200_v1_3.gz 5/21/2008 1:22:53 PM\|\|Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 5/21/2008 1:22:53 PM\|rosetta@home\|Temporarily failed download of paths.vf2.9.3.txt.gz: system connect 5/21/2008 1:22:53 PM\|rosetta@home\|Started download of boinc_vf_aa1ten_09_05.200_v1_3.gz 5/21/2008 1:22:54 PM\|\|Access to reference site succeeded - project servers may be temporarily down. 5/21/2008 1:23:22 PM\|rosetta@home\|Finished download of boinc_vf_aa1ten_03_05.200_v1_3.gz 5/21/2008 1:23:22 PM\|rosetta@home\|Started download of vf_1ten.pdb.gz 5/21/2008 1:23:54 PM\|rosetta@home\|Finished download of vf_1ten.pdb.gz 5/21/2008 1:23:54 PM\|rosetta@home\|Started download of abrelax_description.txt 5/21/2008 1:24:14 PM\|rosetta@home\|Finished download of boinc_vf_aa1ten_09_05.200_v1_3.gz 5/21/2008 1:24:15 PM\|\|Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 5/21/2008 1:24:15 PM\|rosetta@home\|Started download of paths.vf2.9.3.txt.gz 5/21/2008 1:24:15 PM\|rosetta@home\|Temporarily failed download of abrelax_description.txt: system connect 5/21/2008 1:24:17 PM\|\|Access to reference site succeeded - project servers may be temporarily down. 5/21/2008 1:24:17 PM\|rosetta@home\|Finished download of paths.vf2.9.3.txt.gz 5/21/2008 1:24:17 PM\|rosetta@home\|Started download of abrelax_description.txt 5/21/2008 1:24:18 PM\|rosetta@home\|Finished download of abrelax_description.txt -- Other env stuff I live in Florida with a DSL from Bellsouth -- ping results.. ----boinc.bakerlab.org PING Statistics---- 7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/med = 94/101/140/94 --- No entries today in stdoutdae.txt --- Maybe server is just, plain, busy.. Thanks for all your hard work!! Jay