1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Tells us your thoughts on granting credit for large protein, long-running tasks
(Message 97304)
Posted 9 Jun 2020 by Joseph Francis Post: I don't care if its fast or slow every bit helps anyway. Science computing isn't about status or credit its about working together as a community. The only realistic benefit of credit status is what your machine can do; that others can reference to develop projects that bring balance to the evolution of technological trends and what legacies still exist needing support.. I haven't come here for a reputation nor status I came here to help solve a problem. When the problem is solved I would look as the community as a whole not just the fastest and biggest. I think status means little compared to participation. I have done in another project 1 years worth of work credit in 48 hours in comparison to my participation of years. But I could be absent for many months usually participating in other projects or playing Blizzard games in the SETI forum they will see that and you won't get voice for credit you get voice for participation. I don't do SETI much if they did find something it'd be watered down or banned from public notice. This is my view that the more smaller fish the bigger the stock. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Tells us your thoughts on granting credit for large protein, long-running tasks
(Message 97302)
Posted 9 Jun 2020 by Joseph Francis Post: Would like to see GPU work units in this project is where my desktop has its most efficient throughput. |
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org