Posts by Picard2UK

1) Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : DISCUSSION of Rosetta@home Journal (3) (Message 44369)
Posted 26 Jul 2007 by Picard2UK
Post:
can someone explain where the electrons could come from for the proposed carbon capture reaction? Could you just put an annode/cathode into the mix with a generator and have the electrons free like that or would it need to be in the form of ATP or something similar?


excellent question. you could just put in an annode/cathode, but this still begs the question of where the current comes from. one possibility is nuclear power plants at night when demand for electricity is way down. the problem of course is that reducing C02 requires energy input; the options are sunlight (put the engineered enzymes into photosynthesizing organisms) and not too many other possibilities.

thanks David. In that case (if a simple anode/cathode could be used) this would be perfect. If it could produce ethanol or something similar then that would be fantastic, although i guess you can always produce ethanol from sugars using traditional methods anyway :)

(Enviromission video is here: http://www.enviromission.com.au/project/video/video.htm)


Watched the video and an awe inspiring concept for the future generations to marvel at

(Climbs on soap box)

Only one drawback to this is the constant problems of people not wanting something "Blotting There Landscape"

In the UK putting up wind farms are a constant battle from local inhabitants not wanting something so hideous in there "Back Yard", but also being contradictory in the fact they want to,or, want someone else to something to help the environment as the carbon footprint is getting larger.

Governmental papers that have been posted are now looking to place wind farms off shore, but are also having opposition because of environmental issues being raised,
sea life degradation due to installation of said wind farms
impact of tourism on towns/villages of proposed sites

As we have seen Y2K come and go we are still in a mind set opinion "its not going to happen in my life time",that we fail to see what impact it is going to have on future generations.
In short we need to wake the world up to what is actually happening and also what is going to happen if we don't act now in years to come.

(climbs off soap box)
thanks for reading
2) Questions and Answers : Windows : Credit Claimed vs Granted (Message 44350)
Posted 26 Jul 2007 by Picard2UK
Post:
A single 2G AMD Athlon Thunderbird XP 2600+, i know its old and she does very well for what she is, its was just the (mater of factly)your AMD computer sucks and possibly your Intel too, that was just insulting to hear.
Also my preffs are set to show pc's i dont know why there not showing
3) Questions and Answers : Windows : Credit Claimed vs Granted (Message 44343)
Posted 26 Jul 2007 by Picard2UK
Post:
Another way to put it is that SETI is giving your AMD machine more credit then the work produced would likely deserve.



OMG did you just slap me in the face ???(i think you did!!)
you can see the stats of both my machines, there not lacking in any respect as far as i can see, no less than most of the machines crunching for rosetta.
4) Questions and Answers : Windows : Credit Claimed vs Granted (Message 44338)
Posted 26 Jul 2007 by Picard2UK
Post:
Credits granted by Rosetta are based on work completed. Each task returned is typically made up of many models computed. Some types of machines are able to crunch a model more efficiently then others. Large CPU cache size is one factor that helps.

Find a task on each of the machines with a very similar name, and compare the number of "decoys" shown in the result file. Now divide the number of CPU seconds by the number of decoys. That shows the number of seconds the machine took for each model. You will see that your AMD machine takes more seconds to complete a model then your other.

The credit "claimed" is based on the BOINC benchmarks, which do not at all measure the ability of your processor cache, nor the amount of memory available. The credit "granted" is based on the amount of work completed. When the two numbers differ significantly, it indicates that the benchmarks do not utilize the portions of the machine needed for Rosetta to run. The benchmarks are not specific to Rosetta. Even withing Rosetta, different task types have slightly different performance characteristics.

so in layman's terms my AMD sucks at crunching rosetta and should switch to SETI anyway, and use my 2G dual core Intel for crunching solely rosetta as it can cope with the data more efficiently ?
5) Questions and Answers : Windows : Credit Claimed vs Granted (Message 44335)
Posted 26 Jul 2007 by Picard2UK
Post:
I have 2 computers running rosetta@home, the first one is a 2G dual core Intel and is granted the same amount of credit(sometimes a little more) for each model it crunches,
The second is a 2G AMD this computer however,only gets half of the credits it is supposed to be asking for/allotted.

Why is this happening ???
I really would like some explanation to this as its getting me frustrated for it to be crunching rosetta @ half the credits i should be earning,

It also crunches SETI@home and receives the full credit asked for/allotted someone show me a way to fix it, or i will just be turning to SETI for crunch credits instead.
6) Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Welcome to Team England (Boinc) (Message 43575)
Posted 13 Jul 2007 by Picard2UK
Post:
Thought i would drop u guys a line to say hi
glad to be in the team






©2026 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org