Posts by Bender10

1) Message boards : Number crunching : BOINC and electricity (Message 43109)
Posted 3 Jul 2007 by Bender10
Post:
If you run 'straight' BOINCpe, there is no writing to the 'Flash Drive'. The OS is loaded onto a 'RamDrive'. So, no writes to the 'Flash' which may shorten the life of the 'Flash', unless you program a backup to the 'Flash'.

I have run the following Projects on BOINCpe so far, with a 256 'RamDrive' (this leaves me a little over 512MB free ram for crunching) with no memory issues (yeti).

And since BOINC likes 128 MB ram or better, This works good. I am toying with going up to 1.5 or 2 gig of ram for my BOINCpe boxes


PROJECTS:
BOINC (about 12 different projects), D2OL, TSC and Pi Segment.

With D2Ol and TSC, I typically run with about 100-200 wu's on the 'RamDrive' each. I have yet to use more than 50-70 MB of the 'RamDrive' while running most projects. Execpt for BURP, That takes up a lot of space (>35 MB)...

NOTE: I just finished running 5 days worth of Proteins wu's from a BOINCpe box...
2) Message boards : Number crunching : BOINC and electricity (Message 43098)
Posted 3 Jul 2007 by Bender10
Post:
Hi student,

I just ran across your post while looking for some BOINCpe stuff.

I've been playing with BOINCpe for a little while (on and off). Right now I have 2 boxes (soon to be 3) running on it. Here is the thread for our board:

http://amdusers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3760

No professional testers, just poking around. It is an interesting platform.

Right now I have both boxes booting from 'Flash Drives' (even less power draw than a CD-rom). Box #2 has an ASUS micro ATX MB, with onboard video, lan, No drives, 1 gig ram and a X2 4200(89w) with no OC. It runs at 100 watts at 100% cpu usage. This is the only 89w cpu I have. Everything else is 65w (4800's and 5200's).

I have 5 of these boxes right now, and plan on running BOINCpe on all of them.

EDIT: I have a Kill-a Watt....
3) Message boards : Number crunching : BOINC and electricity (Message 43095)
Posted 3 Jul 2007 by Bender10
Post:
39472: "It may not be worth running BOINC on old computers because the science completed by an old 450MHz desktop may not outweigh the expenditure of electricity and thus fossil fuels. Is the tiny amount of science crunched by old computers worth the extra pollution?"

Great point. More generally, at what RAC does a dedicated host become environmentally justifiable? Maximizing a dedicated host's RAC/watt can involve more than getting the most power-efficient CPU - unplugging the monitor, keyboard, mouse and video card (assuming the host isn't being used) will save a good amount of energy.

And though I haven't experimented with it yet, BOINCpe supposedly makes for more energy efficient computing because it uses a CD-ROM drive instead of the typical hard disk configuration. I would be interested to know the average energy savings from switching to CD-ROM based BOINCpe. The only way I can think of to easily measure the difference is with a power meter, something like a P3 P4400 Kill A Watt Electric Power Usage Monitor.







©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org