|
41)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Error report
(Message 470)
Posted 25 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: @All A friend got the same error like you (but no problems with the other Boinc projects). He has also "only" 256 mb of ram and all the wus ran errored. He tried "Leave applications in memory while preempted? yes" and now, all is ok. So when i saw your error message, i had the same idea. |
|
42)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
If There Is No Screensaver........
(Message 468)
Posted 25 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: We know all that a screensaver is not the "best solution" to run a project. But if people who would like to get a screensaver don't ask, never they will know if it's possible or not. Sure, "lack of a screensaver doesn't kill projects" but a screensaver will not kill also a project (i hope !) David Kim said "We will work on adding a screensaver", so perfect. This way, everybody will be happy. :) |
|
43)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
If There Is No Screensaver........
(Message 467)
Posted 25 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: easy... not everyone that notes there is non is automatically moaning about it. normaly you note things you see during beta stage. Predictor had a screensaver with the versions 4.3x. They got some problems and they needeed to revert to the version 4.28 which has no screensaver. |
|
44)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
If There Is No Screensaver........
(Message 465)
Posted 25 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: I find it pathetic that some people are moaning about a stupid screensaver this project is in BETA and has better things to deal with at the moment than some cosmetic surgery on a screensaver. Folding@home Beta has a screensaver. |
|
45)
Questions and Answers :
Windows :
Where's the screensaver?
(Message 464)
Posted 25 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: We have no plans yet to add a graphics display other than the default BOINC client screen saver, which should provide the progress of the current workunit running. I'm not sure that i understand you very well about "no time competitive" but if you want some times about some others Boinc projects : Seti@home Beta : 2 days 17 min (my last wu uploaded today) Folding@home Beta : 30 hours or + 45 hours or + 85 heures ! Rosetta, at least for me, even with the 4.75, was pretty "competitive". ;) |
|
46)
Questions and Answers :
Windows :
0xc0000005 error
(Message 462)
Posted 25 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: @Hickory Explorer A question : Dou you get this error when Boinc switches to an other Boinc project ? |
|
47)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Error report
(Message 455)
Posted 25 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: @All If somebody has a better idea, i'm sure that C. Barrett will be happy to hear you. He has also 512 mb of ram. And if he dooesn't try, he will not know if my idea is the or a solution. |
|
48)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Processing my first 4 WUs
(Message 448)
Posted 25 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: Welcome :) |
|
49)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Error report
(Message 447)
Posted 25 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: Leave applications in memory while preempted? yes that will help |
|
50)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Any chance of a graphic? (not screensaver)
(Message 400)
Posted 24 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: We are working on a screensaver. Yes, they slow down the crunching but since you have the choice to run it... And OpenGl (not bound to a specific architecture - cpu or Os) is more universal than D3D. |
|
51)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimized Windows Application
(Message 386)
Posted 23 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: <i>4.77 seems to be doing the trick alright! It's been paused, stopped (service), benchmarked and rebooted and appears to be able to take it all in its stride. Plus its a hell of a lot faster that 4.75!</i> the 4.76 was already faster than the 4.75 ;) |
|
52)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimized Windows Application
(Message 361)
Posted 23 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post:
That's ok now :)) |
|
53)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimized Windows Application
(Message 348)
Posted 23 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: About the "problem of 1 %" (when the wu dropped back to 1 %) I ran 4 wus (with the 4.76) and i noted that the wu dropped back when it reached 75 % ; if no problem the next step would be 83,33 % but this is not what happens. I see in the progress (% done) 66.67 % -> 75 % -> 1 % -> 91.67 % -> 100 % That seems to be a problem of display (?) because the wu goes on its work. |
|
54)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
My experience with Rosetta WU's
(Message 344)
Posted 22 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: With the new 4.76 1) 1h 36 min 2) 1h 30 min 3) 1h 34 min no errors Barton 3200+ Win2k CC 4.32 |
|
55)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
My experience with Rosetta WU's
(Message 288)
Posted 21 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: first Wu : 9h 49 min 19 sec (35,358.59 sec) Barton 3200+ Win2k 1 GB memory CC 4.32 Running with Sztaki, ressource share (100/100) |
|
56)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Stats
(Message 105)
Posted 17 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: Thanks ! :) |
|
57)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Stats
(Message 90)
Posted 17 Sep 2005 by Nightbird Post: Do you export your XML stats ? |
©2026 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org