1)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Project Superlinkattechnion is offline
(Message 44627)
Posted 2 Aug 2007 by Nightbird Post: I quote MarkS, admin on the project superlinkattechnion
source : BoincSynergy BoincStats |
2)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Massive Censorship at Predictor Boards!
(Message 42551)
Posted 24 Jun 2007 by Nightbird Post: Generally speaking of thread censorship, sometimes it's needed. There is one Boinc project whose message boards are not moderated. Some time ago, a thread was started in which the poster advocated killing, assassination, and beheading. This thread has been on the board for months. I posted my feelings and detached from the project. Some of you out there may be tired of my rant about this, but I'm still shocked by the violence advocated in that thread. Freedom of Speech is not absolute, especially when advocating violence and hate. Moderation is not necessarily censorship. |
3)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Massive Censorship at Predictor Boards!
(Message 40013)
Posted 28 Apr 2007 by Nightbird Post: Now all wu's are cleared his total credit has been zeroed. And now it was more important to delete the messenger's account than deleting Wate's account... |
4)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Massive Censorship at Predictor Boards!
(Message 38221)
Posted 24 Mar 2007 by Nightbird Post: It doesn't sound like an approach that is going to get the results you were after. Writing an email to the developers of the project, calmly and diplomatically explaining the proof that the accused is doing inappropriate things, and then showing how similar people have been dealt with on other Boinc projects should allow it to be dealt with properly. Apologize for what ??? |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Trojan boinc installation by rogue member
(Message 37239)
Posted 27 Feb 2007 by Nightbird Post: Rosetta Admin should remove all of Wate's credits. That way when the stats update he loses everything. I wonder if any admin here reads this topic. ClimatPrediction : 3,631,651 credits -> zeroed Einstein@home : 2,463,297.43 credits -> zeroed PrimeGrid : + 930,000 credits -> zeroed Simap : 94,494 credits -> zeroed |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.24
(Message 19393)
Posted 28 Jun 2006 by Nightbird Post: wu : t312__CASP7_JUMPRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE_hom009__711_8478 estimated completion time : + 41 days Though the wu is suspended, it goes on to run in the background (slowly). cpu time : 9h 55 min xx sec. (always increasing) % done : 1 % |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.16 I
(Message 16663)
Posted 19 May 2006 by Nightbird Post: |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.16 I
(Message 16656)
Posted 19 May 2006 by Nightbird Post: |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.16 I
(Message 16648)
Posted 19 May 2006 by Nightbird Post: |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.16 I
(Message 16516)
Posted 18 May 2006 by Nightbird Post: |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.07
(Message 15640)
Posted 7 May 2006 by Nightbird Post: Got after i rebooted my machine : (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) FACONTACTS_NOFILTERS_1vie__441_93_1 stderr out <core_client_version>4.32</core_client_version> <message>Fonction incorrecte. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> # random seed: 3203608 # cpu_run_time_pref: 21600 </stderr_txt> Validate state Invalid http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=18716104 |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.07
(Message 15316)
Posted 2 May 2006 by Nightbird Post:
I can't exit Boinc immediately because my machine is running also uFluids@home. This application has no checkpoint. I have began a wu "zerobubble" and after 7h 34 min of cpu time, the % done is at 39 %. So i need to wait. For now i suspended my wu Rosetta. |
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.07
(Message 15315)
Posted 2 May 2006 by Nightbird Post: Are you saying that the CPU time is not increasing, even though it's "running"? Is the idle process getting all the CPU time when this WU is "running"? Exactly, the cpu time is not increasing. I will check the messages. |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.07
(Message 15280)
Posted 2 May 2006 by Nightbird Post:
The problem is that the wu 1di2 is in this state since 2 days now. Perhaps i must abort the wu. (?) |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.07
(Message 15254)
Posted 2 May 2006 by Nightbird Post: and a problem : the wu stopped at 33.22 % done. I did a screenshoot with this wu "not working" (1di2) and an other wu working (2tif) |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.07
(Message 15102)
Posted 30 Apr 2006 by Nightbird Post: First wu with 5.07 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=15414717 and a problem : the wu stopped at 33.22 % done. (edit : i don't wish to reboot the machine or start again Boinc immediately. Why ? because i'm running also uFluids@home on this machine and this application has no checkpoint ; if needeed i will have to wait) |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Shorter WU deadlines
(Message 10512)
Posted 6 Feb 2006 by Nightbird Post: anyway, more than you wanted to know I am sure ... Indeed but i don't have the feeling that I understand you. ;) |
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Shorter WU deadlines
(Message 10497)
Posted 6 Feb 2006 by Nightbird Post: When work is created it has a number which essentially says how many OPS it will take to complete. From this the max time is calculated. If the number was too low, there is not enough time to do all the operations so the Result times out. Thanks for your answer :) but OPS ? operations, i guess and a new acronym for your "BOINC Acronyms" ;) and how is calculated the max time ? |
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Shorter WU deadlines
(Message 10489)
Posted 5 Feb 2006 by Nightbird Post: @ David Baker another change is that the maximum work unit length has been increased to eliminate (hopefully!) the time out problem. Ehm, can you explain ? not sure that i understand here |
20)
Questions and Answers :
Web site :
Computation Errors
(Message 9586)
Posted 22 Jan 2006 by Nightbird Post: So the wu is invalid ? |
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org