|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65300)
Posted 12 Feb 2010 by Admin Post: Compute error - exit status 1 lrmixclus_opt_.1hz6.1hz6.SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST.c.20.2.pdb.pdb.JOB_17816_1_0 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=317250268 ERROR: start_res != middle_res ERROR:: Exit from: ....srcprotocolsmovesKinematicMover.cc line: 132 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out |
|
2)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Possible cancer cure found in plant
(Message 65235)
Posted 8 Feb 2010 by Admin Post: http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,,26677869-3102,00.html Very interesting article... |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65213)
Posted 5 Feb 2010 by Admin Post: Access Violation Error - lr15clusfa_opt_.1bgf.1bgf.IGNORE_THE_REST.c.85.0.pdb.pdb.JOB_17562_3_0 Link: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=315684378 - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x006D2D46 read attempt to address 0x00000000 Debug info in link as usual - Wingman also had same error |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65211)
Posted 5 Feb 2010 by Admin Post: Seems if i give it some time it finds the protean structure again it was quite strange. Also I wanted to give a headsup that im having a huge issue with the boinc_filtered_lookbuild_threading WU's. Most of the new ones i have received have stalled at about 5 percent and ive had to abort. Are we any closer to fixing this issue because it seems to be getting worse. Ill give you some info on my current one though: protein: t385, cpu time at last checkpoint 33:20, cpu time: 34:24, elapsed time 14:21:01. |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Jobs lock up and never finish
(Message 65204)
Posted 4 Feb 2010 by Admin Post: Yes, this has been a common problem for some. I would check the Rosetta 2.05 topic. Ive been having alot of trouble with these type work units as of late. |
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65198)
Posted 4 Feb 2010 by Admin Post: Strange seems to be fine now, you can disregard earlier post. |
|
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65195)
Posted 4 Feb 2010 by Admin Post: Just took a look at my graphics and saw this, is it normal? Ive been watching it for awhile now and it seems to be stuck on the model 2 step 0. Any ideas on what i should do?
|
|
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65148)
Posted 30 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: Unhandled Exception Error - cl1.1ail.1ail.IGNORE_THE_REST.c.6.3.pdb.pdb.JOB_17227_4_0 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=313910991 WU froze at 61% complete. I found it and had to abort it after 10 hours of run time. - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Breakpoint Encountered (0x80000003) at address 0x75E31AF3 Debug info in link as usual |
|
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65132)
Posted 27 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: Unhandled Exception Error - cl1.1ail.1ail.IGNORE_THE_REST.c.4.22.pdb.pdb.JOB_17227_9_1 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=313773510 - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x006D2D46 read attempt to address 0x00000000 Debug Info in link.. failed at 21 seconds |
|
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65124)
Posted 27 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: Compute error occurred - Exit status -1073741819 (0xc0000005). Debug info is far too advanced for me to get any info from, so a team member will need to look at it. Occurred with cl1.2cmx.2cmx.IGNORE_THE_REST.c.0.25.pdb.pdb.JOB_17322_1_1. Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x006D2D46 read attempt to address 0x00000000 Link: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=313485467. Wingman also received compute error with same WU. |
|
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65111)
Posted 25 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: Mod, I checked it last night, and it went though fine this morning but the values were defiantly very high either 7.6mill or 760k, the protein wasn't even in the window so I know it was a high value. Doesn't seem to be occurring with any other such WU right now, but ill keep an eye out. |
|
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65104)
Posted 25 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: Just thought Id add to the post above mine. I can also confirm energy levels for t311 (same WU) have been sky high some values like 76053423 and RMSD running around 700. Thought it was strange so Id let you guys know. |
|
13)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
tyrsim_3gbn
(Message 65073)
Posted 23 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: Ive been getting quite a few of these lately, and each has a high model count. Im curious to know what you guys are looking at with these workunits. Could someone explain? Thanks. |
|
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65069)
Posted 22 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: Compute Error relaxopt_grow.1bk2.1bk2.IGNORE_THE_REST.S_00066_0000013_0_0000_noncon_00066.pdb.JOB_16957_8 ERROR: LoopRebuild::ERROR Loop definition out of boundary ERROR:: Exit from: ....srcprotocolsloopsLoops.cc line: 595 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out called boinc_finish |
|
15)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Facebook experiment please read and share ideas
(Message 65057)
Posted 22 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: We need more volunteers and facebook can defiantly be a big help especially when it comes to exposure. I know facebook currently has a rosetta group, but it doesnt seem to be doing much. Im sure many users are on facebook. Lets all think of a few good ideas, we can restructure them to work with facebook best, execute, and hopefully see some great success. If we plan this right this might be the big break rosetta needs to rally into the big leagues. Whos with me? Ideas? |
|
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 65025)
Posted 17 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: Validate Error on Win7, successfully completed by a wingman on win xp http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=311128874 name: 8gbnnotyr_3gbn_1iuk_9Jan2010_16915_131_0 |
|
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 64988)
Posted 15 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: I was reading the 2.03 thread and saw something about the checkpoint issue, which i saw with myself just now thats why I thought I would point it out. Your saying everything is fine even though the model says its starting from 1 again correct? Thanks for the help! |
|
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 64986)
Posted 15 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: Just had to shut down boinc, which i did properly to run a few programs quickly. Seems both Wu's the computer was working on started from model 0 when the client restarted. Both units were between 10-15 models done for being around 20% complete which they are currently (20% complete and now working on model 1). Did the units really just start over from 0 and erase all the previous work? Is this another issue we are tracking? Just trying to be helpful! |
|
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 64985)
Posted 15 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: While The boinc_filtered WU went through fine, i have another that has stalled: opttest2.2d4f..... just thought id give an update, it froze at 18.046%. Other than that 2.05 seems stable although sometimes the graphics crash when i try to look at them. |
|
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.05
(Message 64975)
Posted 14 Jan 2010 by Admin Post: Although I didnt grab a screenshot the task details of the work unit show "application version 2.05" You can check it out at http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=310562856. I wish i could give you guys more information, anything else i can do to help you guys solve this issue? All other work so far has gone through fine, but upon further investigation the common factor is windows 7. I have a boinc_filtered loopbuild_threading running now at 33% which gave me problems on 2.03, so i will see how it goes on 2.05 and give an update. |
©2026 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org