Posts by FZB
|
1)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Feedback, .. bandwidth usage :-(
(Message 8726)
Posted 10 Jan 2006 by  FZB
Post:
not sure if it is a out of the box feature but you might get in contact with the einstein@home guys, they have a system where you dl a larger datafile for which you get assigned multiple wu's that all work with that datafile |
|
2)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Happy New Year!
(Message 8241)
Posted 3 Jan 2006 by FZB
Post: happy new year to everyone! |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
client for AMD64 X2 ??
(Message 6069)
Posted 13 Dec 2005 by FZB
Post: this is what my amd reports for cpu type... "AuthenticAMD <LineBreak here> AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+" <> indicates formating... |
|
4)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Merry Christmas to all....
(Message 5278)
Posted 6 Dec 2005 by FZB
Post: isn't christmas some days to go yet? don't tell me i missed it again... ;) |
|
5)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Suggestions and Questions
(Message 4777)
Posted 30 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: the already combined part has no specific mechanism i know off that would prevent it from folding, so it should start right away. well, guess i was wrong here... ("chaperones") |
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New Reccommended Version...
(Message 4751)
Posted 30 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: sure thing beta testing and such is a nice concept (working as a software developer myself), but if you compare FaD and Boinc, please keep in mind (you still consider it wrong) that while FaD made changes for their project client, tested them and released them, boinc does features the seti folks never uses and other parties rely on, and if they run into a bug there, trying to fix them fast isn't the worst approach to keep the community happy. (e.g. trickles used in climatepredict). so boinc would need to set up multiple betas/testprojects, which naturally would not reflect others people complex project apps. its not like they don't test the code at all, just that they miss the manpower for extensive testing. i agree on the others that stated stay with you version as long as it works and your project does not require something newer unless you enjoy upgrading/a specific new feature (say e.g. when the statistics where introduced). IMO there is no "right" way to software development, what works for one project can be difficult to do for another. |
|
7)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Suggestions and Questions
(Message 4750)
Posted 30 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: if you mean "in the same order" like for a a given mRNA, yes, it always translate in the same protein (given there is no error during the synthesis and a bit of simplified). as the protein grows, it starts to fold, though it takes some time until it reaches its final form (there can attach different enzyms to the protein and modifiy it). the growth happens like this: a mRNA is build in the cell nucleos, that is transfered outside the nucleos to a ribosome that encapsulate it (ribosume being different sub parts). begining from a start codon (3 DNA elements like e.g. guanine), tRNAs with matching anticodon (again 3 DNA elements, have to match --> bind with the codon) bind to the mRNS/ribosome. those tRNAs carry the amino acids that are then attached to the growing protein/start amino acid. the already combined part has no specific mechanism i know off that would prevent it from folding, so it should start right away. |
|
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Unrecoverable error
(Message 4666)
Posted 29 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: As Process Explorer shows in that image, I have paused in ram the following assortment: 3 rosetta WU's, 2 predictor WU's, one Einstein, I'm not sure who the Sixtrack belongs to (WCG?) and 7 seti at homes. sixtrack belongs to LHC@home if you run that, sixtrack is also used in some benchmarks. |
|
9)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Graphics
(Message 4301)
Posted 25 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: 4.80 graphical runs great here so far and looks nice, too (vista / gfx7800 gtx) |
|
10)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
No WU download anymore ?
(Message 4238)
Posted 25 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: there was a serie of wu's that had a bad checksum due to some changes earlier this week, you propably saw some of those. the new ones are ok again, so you should not be too worried |
|
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
WU will not upload
(Message 4224)
Posted 25 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: if it is still status running I would give it some more time, predictor e.g. had wu's that would run to 102.x % and then complete. |
|
12)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Screensaver?
(Message 4223)
Posted 25 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: i think vester wanted to point out the part that screensavers nowaday are more decorative than protective. most monitors go into power safe mode after some time regardless of the screensafer and even if not, burn-ins are unlikely with a somewhat modern monitor (example given in the wiki is the windows start button that is all the time in the place if you work on the maschine without being burnd in) |
|
13)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
FYI New boinc version
(Message 4199)
Posted 24 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: auto update for the actual boinc manager was considered but not implemented due to security concerns from admins. many get uncomfortable when they install software that autoupdates |
|
14)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Nice results
(Message 4120)
Posted 24 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: DB said in some other thread that its on his list and there should be updated top predictions in 1-2 weeks |
|
15)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Can someone post a WU graphics screenshot?
(Message 4021)
Posted 23 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: http://www.staff.washington.edu/~jschon/example1.png from http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=252 [edit] ah, too late ;) |
|
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Client Error
(Message 3988)
Posted 22 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: the newest boinc manager should no longer remove the app (rosetta) from memory for benchmarking. so depending on what client you are using this behaviour is normal. (crash by removing from memory = known; 5.1.7 should not remove app while benchmarking, if it doesn, i think that would be a bug) |
|
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
is the queue running dry ?
(Message 3871)
Posted 22 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: That didn't happen this time. The connection never failed. It's just the project had no work. The first time it happened it immediately delayed for 24 hours. I manually updated several times over the next few hours and each time it delayed 24 hours. The fact that the delay time was in the scheduler reply file indicated it came from the scheduler, so I figured it was something that could be set by the project. oh, i see. (after rereading your original post again I could have concluded that you are not affected by the behaviour I described, my bad) |
|
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
is the queue running dry ?
(Message 3863)
Posted 22 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: the delay will increase with every failed connection request. i am not sure if the project can set a min value but normaly you will back off for a minute and when it fails again for 2 mins and so on... (would have to check code for exact time intervalls or how much random amount is in there, too). you can manually connect to the project though (not sure how to do this though with command line boinc) |
|
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Have Graphics Arrived?
(Message 3862)
Posted 22 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: yippie! got 3 graphical wu'S in a row :) |
|
20)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Website suggestions and comments
(Message 3808)
Posted 21 Nov 2005 by FZB
Post: for point 3 you could ask the lattice boinc admins (http://lattice.umiacs.umd.edu/boinc_public/), they have it in their boinc forums: (# unread messages) -- edit -- added linebreak for better reading |
Next 20
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org