1)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Lowest Energy Structure
(Message 30811)
Posted 8 Nov 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: Are only the results with the lowest energy structure kept? |
2)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Personal Milestones
(Message 30514)
Posted 2 Nov 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: Just broke the 1000cr mark... next up, 5000. :D |
3)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Personal Milestones
(Message 30415)
Posted 1 Nov 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: I should hit 500 credits by tomorrow morning. :) |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Rosetta 5.34 ---> 5.36
(Message 30406)
Posted 1 Nov 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: Does it automatically update? Mine was 5.34, but I just checked the results on my last completed project, and it says I'm using 5.36..... |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Rosetta 5.34 ---> 5.36
(Message 30403)
Posted 1 Nov 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: They just switched to 5.36. There's still 5.34 wus being issued apparently. It's kind of like a bubble gum vending machine, just because you poured in a bunch of new blue ones the other colors are still at the bottom being dispensed. Has the problem with viewing the graphics been fixed yet? |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU Time not accurate?
(Message 30348)
Posted 31 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: Rebooted, now it's working right. |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report problems with Rosetta version 5.34
(Message 30347)
Posted 31 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: Rebooting worked. You're the man, Conan! |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report problems with Rosetta version 5.34
(Message 30346)
Posted 31 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: > All I know Soren is that once I turned off the graphics my machine has been working fine. With them on the computer goes slow, locks up and does very little work, needing a reboot half the time. I'll try a quick reboot. |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU Time not accurate?
(Message 30345)
Posted 31 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: Hi Soren, Yes, it's set like that. |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report problems with Rosetta version 5.34
(Message 30342)
Posted 31 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: OK, now it has slowed to a crawl again. No idea why, nothing has changed except I had an error (due to graphics, I think) and I had to get a new project. Any idea what is doing this? |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU Time not accurate?
(Message 30341)
Posted 31 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: *sigh* OK, it has slowed to a crawl AGAIN. No idea why. It's still set on Run Always, with 100% of CPU. |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU Time not accurate?
(Message 30340)
Posted 31 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: Just looked up my error on Google... it looks like other people have had this problem when the graphics are showing. I never turn them on but for some reason BOINC was set for my screensaver. I've turned it off, hopefully that will fix my problem. |
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU Time not accurate?
(Message 30339)
Posted 31 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: I had it on "Run based on preferences". It should have been running all the time based on the settings I put in general preferences, but it didn't seem to do that. I just got this error: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=44626610 Gotta see if I can figure out what it is...
|
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU Time not accurate?
(Message 30337)
Posted 31 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post:
hehehe... I think you're right. No, actually it was because I didn't have the "Always Run" option turned on. |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report problems with Rosetta version 5.34
(Message 30336)
Posted 31 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: Ahhh, run always did the trick. Thank you very much for the welcome, and the help! :) I'm having a problem with R@H as well. My problem is that I set the program up to use 100% of the CPU (which, according to SPeedfan, it is doing), and I leave the program to do its work on a job that it says should take 4 hours CPU time. However, after about 30 minutes of working at full load, it says that it has only completed 1 minute 30 seconds worth of CPU Time. What's up with that? I have ZoneAlarm and AVG Antivirus working on my computer at the same time, is it a conflict with one of these programs? |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU Time not accurate?
(Message 30332)
Posted 31 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: Soren, did you install Boinc while under the Administrator windows login and then is that where you're operating the manager now? How did you install boinc? Single user, Shared, or Service? Yes, it was installed under the Administrator login (it's the only login I have). I installed it as a single user install. Another weird thing I noticed is that my CPU temperature isn't hitting what it should be hitting under full load. With Prime95, I hit around 51C under full load, but with BOINC, I only seem to be hitting the mid 40's... |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU Time not accurate?
(Message 30329)
Posted 31 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: OK, I switched AVG Antivirus and ZoneAlarm off, and it seems to have picked up speed. It's still not running at full speed, though. It is taking 40 seconds to complete 10 seconds of CPU time. Grr... what is going on here. |
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU Time not accurate?
(Message 30325)
Posted 30 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?userid=38837 I'm seeing the CPU Time number from Boinc itself. After 30 minutes real time of running, it was at around 1 minute 30 seconds of CPU Time. I haven't checked the Windows Task Manager yet, but when I hit start on Boinc Speedfan was registering 0% CPU usage, and after I started it the CPU usage went to 100%. |
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report problems with Rosetta version 5.34
(Message 30323)
Posted 30 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: I'm having a problem with R@H as well. My problem is that I set the program up to use 100% of the CPU (which, according to SPeedfan, it is doing), and I leave the program to do its work on a job that it says should take 4 hours CPU time. However, after about 30 minutes of working at full load, it says that it has only completed 1 minute 30 seconds worth of CPU Time. What's up with that? I have ZoneAlarm and AVG Antivirus working on my computer at the same time, is it a conflict with one of these programs? |
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU Time not accurate?
(Message 30319)
Posted 30 Oct 2006 by Soren Hedberg Post: Looks like most of your results are showing the same file access error on your stderr out: That error was fixed by rebooting my computer. Once I did that, it started working. The problem now is that, for example, after it was processing at 100% load (according to Speedfan) for about 30 minutes, the CPU Time listed by the R@H program was like, 1 minute 30 seconds. |
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org