1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Project web page support
(Message 81045)
Posted 16 Jan 2017 by ![]() Post: Do you ever notice that non of the cross-project stats links work. It's been a few years since you could use them. It's getting harder to support something that doesn't give the number cruncher something back for the effort we give. It would be so nice to not have to go to other boinc sites to find out how I am doing compared to other projects. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Web Site Updates
(Message 71141)
Posted 25 Aug 2011 by ![]() Post: Over the last 5 years have have bought computers for nothing else than to crunch data here. I believe it is a good cause. For the last couple years I don't feel the staff is getting very involved here. For example the newest item present when you look into Top predictions in the Statistics section is FOUR years old. Now that Rosetta has a following of crunchers they can just set back. I may be wrong and am now and then but this is my personal option of how I see it. |
3)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
WiFi and Cellphone radiation effects
(Message 71140)
Posted 25 Aug 2011 by ![]() Post: Oh isn't this nice. More junk science. We all better stop using our key-less entry device for your cars and other remote control devices. WiFi junk and cell phones use a fraction of a watt. A old CB radio put out about 5 watts. My Ham Radio can do up to 1000 watts but I find can normally communicate with just a few watts. They better shut down all the TV and Radio stations. Radio stations can go up to 50,000 watts and TV station will go into the hundreds of thousands of watts. If you can receive the radio station or TV station then you are getting more RF energy from them than you will from your cell or WiFi. Besides that, the effects that they are blaming on Cell and Wifi is caused by the Tea Party, everyone knows that. |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
which cpu´s are you using for rosetta?
(Message 70801)
Posted 29 Jul 2011 by ![]() Post: i7 920 at 2.4 Q6600 quad core |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Minirosetta v1.32 bug thread
(Message 54986)
Posted 7 Aug 2008 by ![]() Post: Please post bugs/issues with minirosetta v1.32 here. Had the first one I got fail. ERROR: Cannot find file 'minirosetta_databasechemical/residue_type_sets/centroid/CSD_ATOM_TYPE_SET fa_standard' ERROR:: Exit from: ....srccorechemicalresidue_io.cc line: 132 called boinc_finish It is WU ID 165103113 |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Memory Usage in Beta 5.80
(Message 46367)
Posted 16 Sep 2007 by ![]() Post: There is a recurring problem however in connection with multi-core systems and these "high memory requirement" WUs, which would probably need some co-operation between RAH and the folks at BOINC to resolve by modifying the scheduler logic and/or introducing more WU flags regarding expectable memory use. I have experienced the same condition you described above on my single core Win OS machines. To solve this problem I have installed a memory management tool and set it to scrub the memory every 15 minutes. The scrub option frees up unused memory and returns it to the main memory pool so the Win OS can use it. I don't have to run this tool on the Linux box since that OS doesn't leak memory like the Win type OS does. The utility I use is called Memturbo, (I have no interest or anything else to do with the company or product, I just use it.) I don't know if it will work with a dual or quad core machine. The bottom line is that I have not had this problem or any WU failures since I done this over 24 hours ago. For example on my Intel based P4 2.8Ghz machine I have about 486 Meg of usable RAM. It would drop to 5 Meg of RAM free in about 30 minutes. With the memory being scrubbed every 15 minutes the free RAM figure now sets at over 100 Meg. That worked, no more "waiting or memory" messages. Good luck, hope this helps.
|
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CAPRI14?
(Message 46327)
Posted 16 Sep 2007 by ![]() Post: I am quite curious as to the relative success rate of the Capri14 WUs versus WUs of all other types. David I believe you are having a bad run of luck on the WUs. I also have had several fail but overall better than 95% have finished with valid results. Like a few others I have had to make adjustments to memory allocations on my old machines but the CAPRI14 project will soon be over and we can get back to the same old boring number crunching. I also don't like the "client error" result either it does give me a since of loss. Cheers Jim |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CAPRI14?
(Message 46250)
Posted 15 Sep 2007 by ![]() Post: This is puzzling -- those jobs arent taking long. We'll look into it. In the meanwhile, can your or other post links to the appropriate results that were killed? I have now done several CAPRI14 WUs with 5.80: Only one has a problem: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=95775480 with this result: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=105522388 I don't have a clue as to why it failed to Validate. It seems to have run the full length of time I have set for processing. Thanks, Jim |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CAPRI14?
(Message 46107)
Posted 13 Sep 2007 by ![]() Post: This is puzzling -- those jobs arent taking long. We'll look into it. In the meanwhile, can your or other post links to the appropriate results that were killed? WU: 95285894 WU: 94876951 WU: 94840468 All 3 are CAPRI14 units and ended by the watchdog timer. My runtime is set for 4 hours (14400 seconds). cheers . . . jhf |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.78
(Message 46044)
Posted 12 Sep 2007 by ![]() Post: I'm the second person to get this WU: 94462214 It seems to be missing a file: PROF2.pdb ; will not finish the download just a error message, "file not found". |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Graphics under Ubuntu Linux 7.04 Fasty Fawn
(Message 43168)
Posted 4 Jul 2007 by ![]() Post: Not support.. Okey, but I not understand this messege: The message that Graphics are disabled due to configuration is telling us that the graphics is disabled for Linux systems. The reason is that the code for graphics has not yet been done for Linux. The Questions and Answers section explains that they are working on the code. They are finding that the coding for graphics is fairly large and the resources needed does not allow it to work with systems that have only 256Mbyte of memory. More detail can be found here: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=1878 I hope this helps answer the question for you. |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Graphics under Ubuntu Linux 7.04 Fasty Fawn
(Message 43105)
Posted 3 Jul 2007 by ![]() Post: My understanding is that the Rosetta client does NOT support graphics on Linux operating systems. I could be wrong of course. Jim |
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Credits/CPU Second
(Message 41285)
Posted 22 May 2007 by ![]() Post: Are you talking about a statistic that is in your host's details page? Or are you talking about the chart on this website: http://boinc.netsoft-online.com/e107_plugins/boinc/get_cpcs.php? I use WIN98, 2000, XP and Linux for Rosetta and I don't find a host.gz file on any of them. In what directory are you finding the file? It would be nice to look up credit per cpu sec instead of doing it manually. |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.54
(Message 38102)
Posted 21 Mar 2007 by ![]() Post: Please especially give us some feedback on the graphics -- are you able to display them properly? The Graphics works just fine on 4 machines. The time to completion does count UP until the "model" changes from 1 to 2. It also stayed at 1% until the text indicated it had reached model 2. Then the percentage changed to 18% done. No big deal at all, I don't normally use the graphics anyway, looks like it is working well. No processing errors of any kind. Windows XP, Win 2000, Linux machines. Jim |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.43
(Message 35236)
Posted 21 Jan 2007 by ![]() Post: Has anyone else been having problems opening the BOINC manager from the task bar? I've had this problem at random times for at least the past 4 development releases of BOINC up to the current 5.8.3. Task manager shows both Rosetta threads taking 50/50 CPU share per normal. The only way I can open BOINC manager is if I kill the process and then restart. Anyone else seeing this? Should I consider this strictly a BOINC problem not Rosetta? I agree that this is a BOINC problem and not Rosetta problem. I learned early on to open the manager from the task bar by RIGHT clicking the icon then selecting the "Open BOINC manager" option. If I double click the left button to open it then the odds are that I will have to reboot or kill all the boinc tasks to get the manager to run again. This is on Windows machines. On my linux boxs I have learned to minimize the manager and never "close" the manager or I get a simular problem. Jim |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
How much has your RAC Dropped Since 12/6/06
(Message 33809)
Posted 31 Dec 2006 by ![]() Post: I tend to agree that the RAC has been dropping this month. I have two machines that run Rosetta and nothing else. The first is a Inel based laptop with a 1.70Ghz CPU. The first few days of Dec it had a RAC of 110, the RAC has declined slowly everyday and is at 99 today. It has not show any recovery around the 20th as some have noticed on their machines. I haven't made a single change to this machine. The other machine that only runs Rosetta is a AMD 3400+based CPU BUT I didn't start it until the 12 th of Dec. It is showing an increase everyday but I think this is normal at this point. The other machines run several other projects in addition to Rosetta and they do show the RAC decreasing around the first of Dec and increasing around the 20 of Dec. The other projects are SETI and WGC on both Windows and Linux platforms. I'm not sure what all the results on my machines are telling me. I haven't concluded there is a common factor at his point. Anyway thats my 2 cents worth. |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.43
(Message 33040)
Posted 21 Dec 2006 by ![]() Post: RebelRex It appears I wasn't clear in describing the problem. We are talking the same problem with "unfinished" WU and switching task/projects. Upgrading my Linux DID solve the "unfinished" WU problem for me. It's now been over 24 hours of crunching with no problems.
|
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.43
(Message 32982)
Posted 20 Dec 2006 by ![]() Post: Chu Concerning the problem with Linux machines not processing after switching tasks/projects. I upgraded my Linspire Linux (Debian 3.0 [2.6.10]) to Freespire Linux (2.6.14) At this point the system has completed 3 WUs without any problems. I am also running SETI and WCG (Genome Comparsion) on that machine. So it appears at this point (to me) that if a user has this problem they need to upgrade or change to a different Linux OS. I will post IF this problem reappears. Jim |
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.43
(Message 32948)
Posted 20 Dec 2006 by ![]() Post: Chu No this problem has been happening on my Linux machines since around the 13th or 15th of November. At first I figured it was just my machines. I run two different "flavors" of Linux, Linspire and Mandriva. It has happened on both OS's but mainly on the Linspire machine. I have tried: 1- Turning OFF the "leave in memory" option when switching to another project. Didn't help 2- Extended the processing time from the default 60 min to a longer period. Didn't help 3- Reboot the computer. That works 4- Suspend and Resume task. Didn't help 5- Tonight I installed a newer version of Linux on machine 1. (Will watch and see what happens over night.) Machine 1: 1.3Ghz AMD processor (Linspire-Linux) 377 meg of ram (has only finished about 1/2 dozen Rosetta WUs in the last month) Machine 2: 475 Mhz AMD K6 processor (Mandriva 2007 - Linux) 256 meg of RAM (doesn't process once in a while, but when it doesn't it is after switching projects/tasks) As the other folks have noticed the project says it is RUNNING but CPU time, To Completion time, Progress percentage never changes. (The first time it was "hung" 5 days before I noticed it. Boinc 5.4.9 Rosetta 5.4.x on seems to be a problem Good luck, Jim |
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.43
(Message 32827)
Posted 17 Dec 2006 by ![]() Post: I moved daniels' post here, as he's got Linux problems with 5.43 as well as having seen them on 5.41. I am seeing the same thing on both of my Linux machines. I can make the WU finish by shutting down the computer and restarting it. I tried to suspend the project and let WCG run for a while then resume the Rosetta WU but that didn't work. The Rosetta projects get to about 58.71% done then just set there for hours doing nothing. I did see this before "once" that I remember with 5.41 but 5.43 has become a brick wall. Both machines have 256 meg of RAM. One has Linspire Linux and the other has Mandriva 2007. http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=51996472 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=51738512 Jim |
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org