1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 79410)
Posted 13 Jan 2016 by Steve Post: Hi All, Hi B.E. This looks very similar to my experience (see my recent posts and replies). May I ask: do you suspend/hibernate your laptop or do you shut down and then reboot? My experience has been that some Rosetta tasks go 'waiting to run' or run with no remaining estimate on my system if I don't reboot for several days and they then don't complete for many hours; other Rosetta tasks complete with no issue. If you are using suspend/hibernate (or just shutting the lid on the laptop) try rebooting it occasionally and see if that helps. Best wishes Steve |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 79409)
Posted 13 Jan 2016 by Steve Post: A few things to consider: Well, a week or so on after those option changes and things are much better although not entirely clean - I have 3 tasks that were deadlined 10th Jan, and sat 'waiting to run' for several days while BOINC chose to start running other tasks rather than resume these waiting tasks [I still wonder if this is correct behaviour]. Task Manager typically shows 75% memory in use (9GB out of 12GB) so there's no longer any memory shortage and I have unchecked all the Suspend options in BOINC except CPU above 70% (which it pretty much never is). I'm going to reboot now as this PC has been up since before Christmas, so I'll see if that causes any cleanup. *edit* After a reboot BOINC has started running my two oldest 'waiting' tasks (even though we are past the deadline of 10th Jan). It seems as though a reboot every couple of days is probably the answer. cheers Steve |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 79361)
Posted 5 Jan 2016 by Steve Post: A few things to consider: Thanks Snags - useful input. I have used local settings and the option window confirms that it's using those (it has a button to use prefs from the web but I haven't clicked that) PC is a quad core with 12GB RAM, but it's running several large java-based services so memory typically runs around 80-90% used but with very little swapping. However as I'm not using the largest of those services most days I've now stopped that (releasing around 4GB) and will only run it when I need to access it. Rosetta tasks are usually under 200MB each in task manager so that should now mean there's plenty of memory available. Making previously suggested changes seems to have improved things somewhat (only one overdue task waiting this morning) so I'll see if the latest change does any better. Best, Steve |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 79348)
Posted 2 Jan 2016 by Steve Post: I'm finding that although some tasks complete OK, many more go "waiting to run" and seem to stay that way. I've aborted those that are clearly long past their deadline date but the others just sit there with varying % done and elapsed times. Is this normal? I'd have expected long-past-deadline tasks to be dropped and cleaned up by BOINC (but maybe that takes longer than a week?)Or is there something weird about my PC? Thanks for the suggestion, I've not got "suspend when comouter is in use" checked but I did have "suspend GPU ... when in use" checked so I've cleared that and also allowed tasks to stay in memory when suspended so I'll see if that helps. I've also removed the dormant Malaria Control project (which I deactivated because it hogged the system) so BOINC only has one project to work on. Will see how that goes. Thanks for your response Steve |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 79347)
Posted 2 Jan 2016 by Steve Post: Hi, Understood. I should have said "seem to stay stuck on Waiting to Run with only a small percentage of work completed". I have only Rosetta running (I did run MalariaControl for a while but found it swamped BOINC such that no other tasks would start, so I set it to run no new tasks and now only Rosetta is getting work to do) This PC runs very little other work - it's my retired desktop machine, now acting as a baby fileserver and occasional test machine in my home office, hence I decided in November to run some BOINC work on it. It is set to run BOINC tasks 24 hours a day and I left it running over Xmas and New Year and today found about a dozen unfinished Waiting to Run tasks that were past their deadlines which I've now aborted. What I'm puzzled about is that BOINC is starting new tasks when older ones still are Waiting to Run, but I'm going to try some compute preference changes as suggested in another reply and see if that works better. Thanks for the response Steve |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 79314)
Posted 27 Dec 2015 by Steve Post: Hi, I'm finding that although some tasks complete OK, many more go "waiting to run" and seem to stay that way. I've aborted those that are clearly long past their deadline date but the others just sit there with varying % done and elapsed times. Is this normal? I'd have expected long-past-deadline tasks to be dropped and cleaned up by BOINC (but maybe that takes longer than a week?)Or is there something weird about my PC? Any advice would be welcome. Thanks in advance. Steve |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 79244)
Posted 18 Dec 2015 by Steve Post: Thanks for all the responses, nice to know this thread is monitored :-) OK, I'll be more patient and let them run - maybe reboot the PC every couple of days, which will restart BOINC manager and client. Season's best wishes Steve |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 79236)
Posted 17 Dec 2015 by Steve Post: Hi, I'm experiencing the following: Most Rosetta tasks complete in around 6 to 8 hours on my PC - but frequently I find one or two tasks stop showing an estimated remaining time [just --- in the column]and then they continue to run indefinitely. I let one run for over 36 hours, still not completed, and 'stuck' on about 4% done, but the % varies (never more than 20% though). I accept that estimating is inexact - more of a guess sometimes? - but I've taken to aborting these apparent zombie tasks that are just eating CPU and seemingly not producing results after 12 hours or so. Am I being too pessimistic? should I just let these run and run in the hope they will someday finish? or are these bad tasks? If you need more details please let me know. Thanks Steve |
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org