Posts by Speedy

21) Message boards : Number crunching : Uploading error (Message 69034) Posted 8 Jan 2011 by Speedy Post: From front page. Jan 7, 2010 Well, our luck ran out. The SAN controller that has been causing so much trouble in the last few months finally tipped over in a rather distructive fashion, corrupting the binary tree on which the filesystem is based. We're trying to rebuild the thing but the sheer number of files in the filesystem (> 10M files) makes this process very, very slow. We're bringing the project up from a recent backup (12/09/10) but the backup wasn't a perfect replica of the environment, so we're having to scramble to get all the parts working together again. We only need a few more weeks and then our new, next generation SAN will be ready to be put into place... I just thought the old one would last a few more week. I apologize for the hassle and appreciate your patience as we get things online again... KEL 01/07/11
22) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta 2.17 (Message 68634) Posted 16 Nov 2010 by Speedy Post: Both of the following tasks completed successfully. My runtime pref is 3 hours. 379301586 took 5.89 hours credit 158.14/184.97 & 379301549 took 5.64 hours credit 151.65/184.97. Both are from batch 1FPW_R2. Ran on stock I7 980X with HT on. I'm just passing info on nothing more nothing less. Edits= getting links to work correctly
23) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta 2.14 (Message 67711) Posted 11 Sep 2010 by Speedy Post: P.P.L Your core client (Boinc Manager) is a little out dated, try updating your core client to the recommended version This may help
24) Message boards : Number crunching : SERVER PROBLEMS - 2. (Message 67405) Posted 27 Aug 2010 by Speedy Post: As of 27 Aug 2010 22:04:51 UTC All servers are running. Ready to send 3,280 In progress 258,996
25) Message boards : Number crunching : Redundant projects? (Message 67323) Posted 25 Aug 2010 by Speedy Post: I'm hearing you. Each project focuses on a different type of Protein science. What Poem dose
26) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta 2.14 (Message 67137) Posted 8 Aug 2010 by Speedy Post: Task 357811058 <core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ( left out lines in middle ) Initialization complete. Setting WU description ... Unpacking zip data: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/minirosetta_database_rev36507.zip Unpacking WU data ... Unpacking data: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/yfsong_lrm_jorj_combined_torsion_it06_run01_A.zip Unpacking data: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/lr13_2iiy.fix.out.zip Setting database description ... Setting up checkpointing ... Setting up graphics native ... ERROR: Unable to open weights. Neither ./dslf_weights.wts nor dslf_weights.wts nor minirosetta_databasescoring/weights/dslf_weights.wts exist ERROR:: Exit from: ....srccorescoringScoreFunctionFactory.cc line: 178 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> Validate state Invalid Ran for 7 seconds.
27) Message boards : Number crunching : Large amount of failed WUs. (Message 67117) Posted 6 Aug 2010 by Speedy Post: 357381146 357381134 & 357381125 all tasks start with lrm_jorj_combined_tlrm_jorj_combined_torsion. All tasks end with Compute error. I'm thinking lrm_jorj_combined_tlrm_jorj_combined_torsion is a bad bad batch of tasks.
28) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta 2.14 (Message 67060) Posted 1 Aug 2010 by Speedy Post: result id 356014820 errored out after 28 minutes defult runtime is 10 hours Error output ERROR: rsd_type_list.size() ERROR:: Exit from: ....srccorefragmentFrame.cc line: 62 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]>
29) Message boards : Number crunching : How Are Task/Work units Are Named (Message 67013) Posted 25 Jul 2010 by Speedy Post: Interesting information thanks. In ab task names there is IGNORE_THE_REST. Why is this in task names? Should we manually press update on our clients to return completed CASP9 tasks or let boinc do it's own thing?
30) Message boards : Number crunching : How Are Task/Work units Are Named (Message 66998) Posted 25 Jul 2010 by Speedy Post: Thanks transient. I wonder how many target there are for CASP9?
31) Message boards : Number crunching : How Are Task/Work units Are Named (Message 66996) Posted 25 Jul 2010 by Speedy Post: At present I have 37 ab tasks in line. In ab_07_20_T0618_d003_68_172_d003__SAVE_ALL_OUT.IGNORE_THE_REST_09_15_21680_260_0 can someone explain what the 07_20 & 09_15 & T0618 means? Another example of numbers is ab_07_19_T0616_d000_h002__SAVE_ALL_OUT.IGNORE_THE_REST_04_05_21665_130_1 07_19 & T0616. Would I be correct in saying 07_20 is a date? Can a Mod please rename this thread to How Are Task/Work units Named? Thanks
32) Message boards : Number crunching : Hyper Threading or not? (Message 66952) Posted 19 Jul 2010 by Speedy Post: 1 thing I've noted on my I7 980X is that with ht on ab_07_02 & 07_16 tasks when I open graphics the steps tick over very slowly. When ht is off the steps rool over very fast.
33) Message boards : Number crunching : Results and Scores (Message 66835) Posted 10 Jul 2010 by Speedy Post: Each workunit is actually only a small part of a bigger unit that was split into smaller ones so our pc's can handle it in an efficient manner. Is it possible to include something in each work unit graphics to show us what part from the original structure we are working on? I hope this makes senses
34) Message boards : Number crunching : Cannot Number Crunch ! (Message 65641) Posted 26 Mar 2010 by Speedy Post: Are you crunching for Rosie 100% of do u have another projects tasks nearing there deadline? Have you made sure you have allowed work if yes try reseting the project db status As of 26 Mar 2010 23:15:01 UTC Ready to send 33,252 In progress 459,404
35) Message boards : Number crunching : SERVER PROBLEMS - 2. (Message 64613) Posted 28 Dec 2009 by Speedy Post: As of 28 Dec 2009 20:56:33 UTC Ready to send__726 As of 28 Dec 2009 21:20:14 UTC Ready to send ___1,098 & Heidi1 Thanks for info Rosie is in the same time zone as Seti so it makes it nice and easy to work out what the time is in Rosie server land.
36) Message boards : Number crunching : SERVER PROBLEMS - 2. (Message 64587) Posted 24 Dec 2009 by Speedy Post: That could be a strong possibility. At the moment it's either Thursday 12:04 sm or Thursday 3:04 am in Washington I'm not sure what part of Washington Rosie is located in. It will be like it for a few more hours to come that's assuming the team is working on Xmas eve, otherwise it will be like it for a few days. Merry Christmas and happy New Year
37) Message boards : Number crunching : SERVER PROBLEMS - 2. (Message 64585) Posted 24 Dec 2009 by Speedy Post: From front page The project was shut down temporarily to make modifications to the SAN filesystem. -KEL/DOVA Might be part of the problem. I have 1,104.50 credits pending. This is the 1st time I've had this much pending on Rosie.
38) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta 2.03 (Message 64532) Posted 16 Dec 2009 by Speedy Post: No, but 129 decoys is a good thing - isn't it ? Absolutely. Reason I asked was because I thought there was a 100 decoy limit for tasks that had a high model count. I think it was limited because there were upload problems for tasks that had over 100 decoys.
39) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta 2.03 (Message 64527) Posted 15 Dec 2009 by Speedy Post: Is the stack overflow issue the reason why mix_score13_env_rlbd_1hz6__IGNORE_THE_RESTlr8_DECOY_16523_77_09 made 129 decoys from 129 attempts?
40) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.98 (Message 64444) Posted 12 Dec 2009 by Speedy Post: Thanks I cant remember the last time I had a 5.98 task. I will look out for a 5.98 task.

Previous 20 · Next 20