|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 71749)
Posted 5 Dec 2011 by Leland Kornhaus
Post: Thank you for the explanation. > Normally the servers are able to keep up with the validation. However, there > was a crash this week so there is a big post-crash backlog to handle. I do > not know if the crash was a server crash or a networking hardware failure, > but the results are the same either way. This project apparently has very > little margin left and probably needs to upgrade its servers.[/quote] |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 71747)
Posted 4 Dec 2011 by Leland Kornhaus
Post: Two more work units continuing to run with elapsed time and time to go increasing simultaneously. This has been going on too long - it doesn't seem as if Rosetta can manage their system - I quit! there are many more systems that run without problems! I've got the same issue. First, I had a lot of 3 hour tasks that would take 7+ hours of processor time: Here's a nice example that was granted less than 1/6th the claimed credit: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=465189829 ... but at least it was granted credit! Since December 1st I believe I have 179 work units with about 20,600 in claimed credits that are still pending. If the work units aren’t even acknowledged, are they being used? I’d hate this much electricity & processing to be wasted on random work that isn’t valued. |
©2026 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org